lofyerandfactory-droid[bot] <138933559+factory-droid[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
71db82393a
Co-authored-by: factory-droid[bot] <138933559+factory-droid[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
4820 lines
238 KiB
HTML
4820 lines
238 KiB
HTML
<!DOCTYPE html>
|
||
<html lang="zh-CN">
|
||
<head>
|
||
<meta charset="UTF-8">
|
||
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
|
||
<title>上实剑桥课程实施监测数据分析报告</title>
|
||
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/echarts@5/dist/echarts.min.js"></script>
|
||
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/echarts-gl@2/dist/echarts-gl.min.js"></script>
|
||
<style>
|
||
:root {
|
||
--primary: #1a56db;
|
||
--primary-light: #e8effc;
|
||
--success: #059669;
|
||
--success-light: #d1fae5;
|
||
--warning: #d97706;
|
||
--warning-light: #fef3c7;
|
||
--danger: #dc2626;
|
||
--danger-light: #fee2e2;
|
||
--gray-50: #f9fafb;
|
||
--gray-100: #f3f4f6;
|
||
--gray-200: #e5e7eb;
|
||
--gray-300: #d1d5db;
|
||
--gray-500: #6b7280;
|
||
--gray-700: #374151;
|
||
--gray-900: #111827;
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
* { margin: 0; padding: 0; box-sizing: border-box; }
|
||
|
||
body {
|
||
font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", "PingFang SC", "Hiragino Sans GB",
|
||
"Microsoft YaHei", "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;
|
||
color: var(--gray-900);
|
||
background: var(--gray-50);
|
||
line-height: 1.8;
|
||
font-size: 15px;
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
.report-container {
|
||
max-width: 1100px;
|
||
margin: 0 auto;
|
||
background: white;
|
||
box-shadow: 0 1px 3px rgba(0,0,0,0.1);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/* 封面 */
|
||
.cover {
|
||
text-align: center;
|
||
padding: 80px 60px;
|
||
background: linear-gradient(135deg, #1e3a5f 0%, #2563eb 100%);
|
||
color: white;
|
||
}
|
||
.cover h1 { font-size: 32px; margin-bottom: 16px; font-weight: 700; }
|
||
.cover .subtitle { font-size: 18px; opacity: 0.9; margin-bottom: 40px; }
|
||
.cover .school-name { font-size: 42px; font-weight: 700; margin: 30px 0; letter-spacing: 4px; }
|
||
.cover .date { font-size: 16px; opacity: 0.7; margin-top: 40px; }
|
||
|
||
/* 正文 */
|
||
.section { padding: 40px 60px; page-break-before: auto; }
|
||
.section h1 {
|
||
font-size: 26px; color: var(--primary); margin-bottom: 24px;
|
||
padding-bottom: 12px; border-bottom: 3px solid var(--primary);
|
||
}
|
||
.section h2 { font-size: 22px; color: var(--gray-900); margin: 28px 0 16px; }
|
||
.section h3 { font-size: 18px; color: var(--gray-700); margin: 20px 0 12px; }
|
||
.section p { margin: 10px 0; text-indent: 2em; text-align: justify; }
|
||
|
||
/* 得分卡片 */
|
||
.score-cards {
|
||
display: grid; grid-template-columns: repeat(auto-fit, minmax(200px, 1fr));
|
||
gap: 16px; margin: 20px 0;
|
||
}
|
||
.score-card {
|
||
background: var(--gray-50); border-radius: 12px; padding: 20px;
|
||
text-align: center; border: 1px solid var(--gray-200);
|
||
transition: transform 0.2s, box-shadow 0.2s;
|
||
}
|
||
.score-card:hover { transform: translateY(-2px); box-shadow: 0 4px 12px rgba(0,0,0,0.08); }
|
||
.score-card .label { font-size: 13px; color: var(--gray-500); margin-bottom: 8px; }
|
||
.score-card .value { font-size: 32px; font-weight: 700; color: var(--primary); }
|
||
.score-card .diff { font-size: 13px; margin-top: 4px; }
|
||
.score-card .diff.positive { color: var(--success); }
|
||
.score-card .diff.negative { color: var(--danger); }
|
||
|
||
/* 图表容器 */
|
||
.chart-box {
|
||
width: 100%; margin: 20px 0; background: white;
|
||
border: 1px solid var(--gray-200); border-radius: 8px; padding: 16px;
|
||
}
|
||
.chart-box .chart { width: 100%; height: 400px; }
|
||
.chart-box .chart-title {
|
||
font-size: 14px; color: var(--gray-500); text-align: center;
|
||
margin-top: 8px; font-weight: 500;
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/* 双图并排 */
|
||
.chart-row {
|
||
display: grid; grid-template-columns: 1fr 1fr; gap: 20px; margin: 20px 0;
|
||
}
|
||
.chart-row .chart-box { margin: 0; }
|
||
.chart-row .chart-box .chart { height: 350px; }
|
||
|
||
/* 三图并排 */
|
||
.chart-row-3 {
|
||
display: grid; grid-template-columns: 1fr 1fr 1fr; gap: 16px; margin: 20px 0;
|
||
}
|
||
.chart-row-3 .chart-box { margin: 0; }
|
||
.chart-row-3 .chart-box .chart { height: 300px; }
|
||
|
||
/* ====== 金字塔水平指示器 ====== */
|
||
.pyramid-container {
|
||
display: flex; flex-direction: column; align-items: center;
|
||
margin: 16px 0; padding: 20px;
|
||
}
|
||
.pyramid-row {
|
||
position: relative;
|
||
display: flex; align-items: center; justify-content: center;
|
||
margin: 3px 0;
|
||
width: 100%;
|
||
}
|
||
.pyramid-block {
|
||
height: 38px; display: flex; align-items: center; justify-content: center;
|
||
font-weight: 700; font-size: 13px; color: white;
|
||
border-radius: 4px; transition: all 0.3s;
|
||
letter-spacing: 1px;
|
||
}
|
||
.pyramid-block.lv4 { width: 140px; background: linear-gradient(135deg, #059669, #10b981); }
|
||
.pyramid-block.lv3 { width: 200px; background: linear-gradient(135deg, #2563eb, #3b82f6); }
|
||
.pyramid-block.lv2 { width: 260px; background: linear-gradient(135deg, #d97706, #f59e0b); }
|
||
.pyramid-block.lv1 { width: 320px; background: linear-gradient(135deg, #dc2626, #ef4444); }
|
||
.pyramid-block.active {
|
||
box-shadow: 0 0 0 3px white, 0 0 0 6px var(--primary);
|
||
transform: scale(1.05); z-index: 2;
|
||
}
|
||
.pyramid-block.dimmed { opacity: 0.35; }
|
||
/* 标注用绝对定位，不影响色块居中 */
|
||
.pyramid-label {
|
||
position: absolute;
|
||
left: calc(50% + 175px); /* 最宽块320/2=160，再留15px间距 */
|
||
font-size: 13px; font-weight: 700;
|
||
color: var(--primary); white-space: nowrap;
|
||
animation: arrowPulse 1.5s infinite;
|
||
}
|
||
.pyramid-label .arrow { margin-right: 4px; }
|
||
@keyframes arrowPulse {
|
||
0%, 100% { opacity: 1; transform: translateX(0); }
|
||
50% { opacity: 0.6; transform: translateX(4px); }
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/* 水平指示器（行内） */
|
||
.level-indicator {
|
||
display: inline-flex; align-items: center; gap: 6px;
|
||
padding: 4px 14px; border-radius: 20px; font-size: 14px; font-weight: 600;
|
||
}
|
||
.level-indicator.level-4 { background: #d1fae5; color: #065f46; }
|
||
.level-indicator.level-3 { background: #dbeafe; color: #1e40af; }
|
||
.level-indicator.level-2 { background: #fef3c7; color: #92400e; }
|
||
.level-indicator.level-1 { background: #fee2e2; color: #991b1b; }
|
||
|
||
/* 水平对比表 */
|
||
.level-table { width: 100%; border-collapse: collapse; margin: 16px 0; font-size: 14px; }
|
||
.level-table th {
|
||
background: var(--primary); color: white; padding: 10px 14px;
|
||
text-align: center; font-weight: 600;
|
||
}
|
||
.level-table td { padding: 10px 14px; text-align: center; border: 1px solid var(--gray-200); font-weight: 600; }
|
||
.level-table .lv4 { background: #d1fae5; color: #065f46; }
|
||
.level-table .lv3 { background: #dbeafe; color: #1e40af; }
|
||
.level-table .lv2 { background: #fef3c7; color: #92400e; }
|
||
.level-table .lv1 { background: #fee2e2; color: #991b1b; }
|
||
|
||
/* 表格 */
|
||
.data-table { width: 100%; border-collapse: collapse; margin: 16px 0; font-size: 14px; }
|
||
.data-table th {
|
||
background: var(--primary); color: white; padding: 10px 14px;
|
||
text-align: center; font-weight: 600;
|
||
}
|
||
.data-table td { padding: 10px 14px; text-align: center; border-bottom: 1px solid var(--gray-200); }
|
||
.data-table tr:nth-child(even) { background: var(--gray-50); }
|
||
.data-table tr:hover { background: var(--primary-light); }
|
||
|
||
/* LLM分析区域 */
|
||
.llm-analysis {
|
||
background: var(--gray-50); border-left: 4px solid var(--primary);
|
||
padding: 20px 24px; margin: 16px 0; border-radius: 0 8px 8px 0;
|
||
}
|
||
.llm-analysis p { text-indent: 2em; margin: 8px 0; }
|
||
.llm-analysis h3 { color: var(--primary); margin: 12px 0 8px; }
|
||
.llm-analysis h4 { color: var(--gray-700); margin: 10px 0 6px; }
|
||
.llm-analysis ul { margin: 8px 0 8px 2em; }
|
||
.llm-analysis li { margin: 4px 0; }
|
||
.llm-analysis strong { color: var(--primary); }
|
||
|
||
/* 图表解读说明（轻量版，紧贴图表下方） */
|
||
.chart-caption {
|
||
background: linear-gradient(135deg, #f0f4ff 0%, #f8fafc 100%);
|
||
border: 1px solid var(--gray-200);
|
||
border-top: none;
|
||
padding: 12px 18px;
|
||
margin: -4px 0 20px 0;
|
||
border-radius: 0 0 8px 8px;
|
||
font-size: 13.5px;
|
||
color: var(--gray-700);
|
||
line-height: 1.7;
|
||
}
|
||
.chart-caption::before {
|
||
content: '▎';
|
||
color: var(--primary);
|
||
font-weight: 700;
|
||
margin-right: 6px;
|
||
}
|
||
.chart-caption p {
|
||
display: inline;
|
||
margin: 0;
|
||
text-indent: 0;
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/* 分隔线 */
|
||
.section-divider {
|
||
border: none; border-top: 2px dashed var(--gray-200);
|
||
margin: 30px 0;
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/* 类型标签 */
|
||
.type-badge {
|
||
display: inline-flex; align-items: center; gap: 6px;
|
||
padding: 6px 16px; border-radius: 20px; font-size: 14px; font-weight: 600;
|
||
}
|
||
.type-badge.good {
|
||
background: linear-gradient(135deg, #d1fae5, #a7f3d0);
|
||
color: #065f46; border: 1px solid #6ee7b7;
|
||
}
|
||
.type-badge.weak {
|
||
background: linear-gradient(135deg, #fef3c7, #fde68a);
|
||
color: #92400e; border: 1px solid #fcd34d;
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/* ====== 右侧目录导航（极简现代风） ====== */
|
||
.toc-nav {
|
||
position: fixed;
|
||
top: 50%; right: 20px;
|
||
transform: translateY(-50%);
|
||
width: 180px;
|
||
max-height: 75vh;
|
||
overflow-y: auto;
|
||
background: rgba(255,255,255,0.85);
|
||
backdrop-filter: blur(12px);
|
||
-webkit-backdrop-filter: blur(12px);
|
||
border-radius: 12px;
|
||
padding: 14px 0;
|
||
z-index: 1000;
|
||
opacity: 0.45;
|
||
transition: opacity 0.3s, box-shadow 0.3s;
|
||
}
|
||
.toc-nav:hover {
|
||
opacity: 1;
|
||
box-shadow: 0 8px 32px rgba(0,0,0,0.08);
|
||
}
|
||
.toc-nav::-webkit-scrollbar { width: 0; }
|
||
|
||
/* 左侧细线轨道 */
|
||
.toc-track {
|
||
position: relative;
|
||
padding-left: 2px;
|
||
}
|
||
.toc-track::before {
|
||
content: '';
|
||
position: absolute; left: 14px; top: 0; bottom: 0;
|
||
width: 1.5px;
|
||
background: var(--gray-200);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
.toc-item {
|
||
display: block;
|
||
position: relative;
|
||
padding: 4px 14px 4px 28px;
|
||
color: var(--gray-500);
|
||
text-decoration: none;
|
||
font-size: 12px;
|
||
line-height: 1.6;
|
||
transition: color 0.2s;
|
||
cursor: pointer;
|
||
}
|
||
/* 轨道上的圆点 */
|
||
.toc-item::before {
|
||
content: '';
|
||
position: absolute; left: 11px; top: 50%;
|
||
width: 5px; height: 5px;
|
||
border-radius: 50%;
|
||
background: var(--gray-300);
|
||
transform: translateY(-50%);
|
||
transition: all 0.25s;
|
||
}
|
||
.toc-item:hover { color: var(--gray-900); }
|
||
.toc-item:hover::before { background: var(--gray-500); }
|
||
|
||
.toc-item.active {
|
||
color: var(--gray-900);
|
||
font-weight: 600;
|
||
}
|
||
.toc-item.active::before {
|
||
background: var(--primary);
|
||
width: 7px; height: 7px;
|
||
box-shadow: 0 0 0 3px rgba(26,86,219,0.15);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
.toc-item.level-1 {
|
||
font-size: 12px; font-weight: 500;
|
||
padding-top: 6px; padding-bottom: 2px;
|
||
color: var(--gray-700);
|
||
}
|
||
.toc-item.level-2 {
|
||
font-size: 11px; font-weight: 400;
|
||
padding-left: 36px;
|
||
color: var(--gray-400);
|
||
max-height: 0; overflow: hidden;
|
||
padding-top: 0; padding-bottom: 0;
|
||
transition: max-height 0.3s ease, padding 0.3s ease, opacity 0.3s;
|
||
opacity: 0;
|
||
}
|
||
.toc-item.level-2.visible {
|
||
max-height: 30px;
|
||
padding-top: 3px; padding-bottom: 3px;
|
||
opacity: 1;
|
||
}
|
||
.toc-item.level-2::before { left: 19px; width: 4px; height: 4px; }
|
||
.toc-item.level-2.active::before { width: 6px; height: 6px; }
|
||
|
||
/* 折叠按钮（如果有chat-fab则上移避让） */
|
||
.toc-toggle {
|
||
position: fixed;
|
||
bottom: 24px; right: 80px;
|
||
width: 40px; height: 40px;
|
||
background: rgba(255,255,255,0.9);
|
||
backdrop-filter: blur(8px);
|
||
color: var(--gray-700);
|
||
border: 1px solid var(--gray-200);
|
||
border-radius: 10px;
|
||
cursor: pointer; z-index: 1001;
|
||
font-size: 18px;
|
||
display: none;
|
||
align-items: center; justify-content: center;
|
||
box-shadow: 0 2px 12px rgba(0,0,0,0.06);
|
||
transition: background 0.2s, box-shadow 0.2s;
|
||
}
|
||
.toc-toggle:hover {
|
||
background: white;
|
||
box-shadow: 0 4px 16px rgba(0,0,0,0.1);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/* 打印样式 */
|
||
@media print {
|
||
body { background: white; }
|
||
.report-container { box-shadow: none; max-width: none; }
|
||
.section { page-break-inside: avoid; }
|
||
.chart-box { page-break-inside: avoid; }
|
||
.chart-row { grid-template-columns: 1fr 1fr; }
|
||
.toc-nav, .toc-toggle { display: none !important; }
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
@media (max-width: 1400px) {
|
||
.toc-nav { width: 160px; right: 12px; }
|
||
}
|
||
@media (max-width: 1280px) {
|
||
.toc-nav { display: none; }
|
||
.toc-toggle { display: flex; }
|
||
.toc-nav.show {
|
||
display: block; right: 12px; bottom: 72px; top: auto;
|
||
transform: none; max-height: 65vh;
|
||
opacity: 1; box-shadow: 0 8px 32px rgba(0,0,0,0.1);
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
@media (max-width: 768px) {
|
||
.chart-row { grid-template-columns: 1fr; }
|
||
.chart-row-3 { grid-template-columns: 1fr; }
|
||
.section { padding: 20px 24px; }
|
||
.cover { padding: 40px 24px; }
|
||
.cover .school-name { font-size: 28px; }
|
||
.toc-nav { display: none; }
|
||
.toc-toggle { display: flex; }
|
||
.toc-nav.show { display: block; width: 170px; }
|
||
}
|
||
</style>
|
||
</head>
|
||
<body>
|
||
|
||
<nav class="toc-nav" id="toc-nav"><div class="toc-track" id="toc-track"></div></nav>
|
||
<button class="toc-toggle" id="toc-toggle" onclick="document.getElementById('toc-nav').classList.toggle('show')">☰</button>
|
||
|
||
<div class="report-container">
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="cover">
|
||
<h1>课程实施监测数据分析报告</h1>
|
||
<div class="subtitle">基于学校领导力视角的七维度分析</div>
|
||
<div class="school-name">上实剑桥</div>
|
||
<div class="subtitle">杨浦区 · 民办高中</div>
|
||
<div class="date">2026年03月18日</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="section" id="part1">
|
||
<h1>第一部分 测评背景与实施</h1>
|
||
|
||
<h2>一、测评背景</h2>
|
||
|
||
<p>为深入贯彻《教育部关于做好普通高中新课程新教材实施工作的指导意见》（教基〔2018〕15号）、《关于新时代推进普通高中育人方式改革的指导意见》（国办发〔2019〕29号）及《基础教育课程教学改革深化行动方案》（教材厅函〔2023〕3号）等一系列国家教育政策导向，积极响应《教育部办公厅关于开展课程实施与教材使用监测工作的通知》（教材厅函〔2023〕5号）的具体要求，上海市教委积极行动，发布了针对性的政策文件，进一步强化国家课程方案的实施转化，并提出建立健全课程实施的监测与反馈机制，以循证决策为引领，持续优化与改进课程规划与实施路径。</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>学校领导力是学校发展的核心驱动力。实施管理的素养导向立意与决策质量直接影响学校课程教学的整体表现与成效。课程实施管理的重点在于学校课程管理规划与施策，以及这些决策在教学活动中的切实落地。鉴于此，我们从学校领导力视角出发，确保课程领导力、教学变革力、学生发展指导力、教师发展支持力、教育质量评估力、教育条件保障力和数字化赋能力七大维度相互协同，共同作用于学校课程实施的全局。</p>
|
||
|
||
<h2>二、测评框架</h2>
|
||
|
||
<p>本报告从学校领导力视角出发，对课程实施监测指标数据进行系统性的分析与指标再建构，构建了学校课程实施的七维度指标体系（见表1-1）。</p>
|
||
|
||
<table class="data-table">
|
||
<caption style="text-align:center; font-weight:600; margin-bottom:10px; color:var(--gray-700);">表1-1 指标体系表</caption>
|
||
<thead>
|
||
<tr><th style="width:120px;">二级维度</th><th style="width:150px;">三级维度</th><th>指标解读</th></tr>
|
||
</thead>
|
||
<tbody>
|
||
<tr>
|
||
<td rowspan="3"><strong>课程领导力</strong></td>
|
||
<td>国家标准遵循</td>
|
||
<td rowspan="3" style="text-align:left;">1.确保开齐开足国家课程；2.考察学校课程设置的合理性与多样性，包括学科类课程、校本课程、综合实践活动与劳动课程各类课程的课程安排与学生实践；3.关注核心素养导向课程的规范化建设情况</td>
|
||
</tr>
|
||
<tr><td>课程结构建设</td></tr>
|
||
<tr><td>课程规范落实</td></tr>
|
||
<tr>
|
||
<td rowspan="2"><strong>教学变革力</strong></td>
|
||
<td>教学方式变革</td>
|
||
<td rowspan="2" style="text-align:left;">1.课中教学方式革新，倡导深度学习，重视个性化教育；2.课后作业设计、管理科学高效</td>
|
||
</tr>
|
||
<tr><td>作业设计与管理变革</td></tr>
|
||
<tr>
|
||
<td rowspan="2"><strong>学生发展指导力</strong></td>
|
||
<td>学科发展的个性化辅导</td>
|
||
<td rowspan="2" style="text-align:left;">1.根据学生的特点和需要，教师进行选课指导、个性化辅导等；2.学校提供个性化的生涯指导服务，建立完善的生涯发展支持体系；3.关注学生综合素质发展</td>
|
||
</tr>
|
||
<tr><td>学生生涯发展指导</td></tr>
|
||
<tr>
|
||
<td rowspan="3"><strong>教师发展支持力</strong></td>
|
||
<td>培训支持</td>
|
||
<td rowspan="3" style="text-align:left;">1.给教师提供入职培训、在职培训以及外出学习机会；2.学校定期组织教研活动，建立教学资源库；3.给教师提供参与科研项目和研究活动的支持</td>
|
||
</tr>
|
||
<tr><td>教研支持</td></tr>
|
||
<tr><td>项目支持</td></tr>
|
||
<tr>
|
||
<td rowspan="4"><strong>教育质量评估力</strong></td>
|
||
<td>科学评价观</td>
|
||
<td rowspan="4" style="text-align:left;">1.面向学生核心素养与综合素质发展，确立科学评价观；2.关注学业质量，对标课程标准科学评价学生表现；3.关注综合素质多方面评价；4.关注学生实践活动表现</td>
|
||
</tr>
|
||
<tr><td>学业质量评估</td></tr>
|
||
<tr><td>综合素质评估</td></tr>
|
||
<tr><td>实践活动评估</td></tr>
|
||
<tr>
|
||
<td rowspan="3"><strong>教育条件保障力</strong></td>
|
||
<td>区域推进</td>
|
||
<td rowspan="3" style="text-align:left;">1.了解学校所在区域教育局对高中教育教学工作的推动情况；2.评估学校信息技术环境、教学设备、场馆设施的支持情况；3.关注学校如何统筹师资配置、校内资源、社区资源等</td>
|
||
</tr>
|
||
<tr><td>环境支持</td></tr>
|
||
<tr><td>资源支持</td></tr>
|
||
<tr>
|
||
<td rowspan="3"><strong>数字化赋能力</strong></td>
|
||
<td>教学方式创新</td>
|
||
<td rowspan="3" style="text-align:left;">1.关注数智化资源支持与赋能课程、教学、评价的情况；2.了解学校校内外的数智化资源、信息化平台与信息系统建设情况</td>
|
||
</tr>
|
||
<tr><td>评价精准化与个性化</td></tr>
|
||
<tr><td>课程迭代优化</td></tr>
|
||
</tbody>
|
||
</table>
|
||
|
||
<h2>三、测评实施</h2>
|
||
|
||
<h3>（一）测评对象</h3>
|
||
<p>本次监测面向杨浦区普通高中学校，共有15所高中学校参与本次监测。每所参与监测的高中学校，均抽取了行政管理部门的学校管理者代表（包括校长、副校长、部门主任等）、各学科教研组组长参加问卷调查。</p>
|
||
|
||
<h3>（二）测评方法</h3>
|
||
<p>基于上海市教师教育学院（上海市教委教研室）开展的中小学课程实施监测的研究框架，采用问卷调查方式采集学校课程实施信息，涵盖学校基础信息、课程实施情况和学科课程实施情况三个维度的数据。</p>
|
||
|
||
<h3>（三）数据分析</h3>
|
||
<p>数据分析流程如下：</p>
|
||
<p><strong>第一，指标体系重构。</strong>基于学校领导力视角的七维度重构维度、指标及具体题目的映射关系，形成多级指标体系。</p>
|
||
<p><strong>第二，PCA（主成分分析）合成。</strong>对问卷中的各个题目进行标准化处理，利用主成分分析方法，将多个相关变量合成为主成分，提取各三级维度得分。</p>
|
||
<p><strong>第三，标准化得分统一量纲。</strong>对PCA合成后的主成分进行标准化处理，将数据统一到均值50、标准差10的正态分布上。68.27%的样本处于[40分, 60分]区间，84.45%处于[30分, 70分]，如某所学校得分为60分，意味着其表现超过了约84%的学校。</p>
|
||
<p><strong>第四，对三级维度划分水平。</strong>依据维度内涵和学校表现分布，从题目层面确定水平划分的分界点分数，对各学校划分水平1~4（见表1-2）。</p>
|
||
<p><strong>第五，聚类分析。</strong>基于标准化得分，对学校进行聚类分析，将具有相似特征的学校归为一类，识别出各维度下不同类型的学校群体。</p>
|
||
|
||
<h3>（四）三级维度水平划分</h3>
|
||
<table class="data-table" style="font-size:13px;">
|
||
<caption style="text-align:center; font-weight:600; margin-bottom:10px; color:var(--gray-700);">表1-2 三级维度水平划分表</caption>
|
||
<thead>
|
||
<tr><th>三级维度</th><th>水平4</th><th>水平3</th><th>水平2</th><th>水平1</th></tr>
|
||
</thead>
|
||
<tbody>
|
||
|
||
<tr>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left;"><strong>国家标准遵循</strong></td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">所有科目必修课程开齐开足，选必和选修满足要求</td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">考试类科目必修开齐，选必和选修满足要求</td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">必修未能开齐开足，选必和选修有一个满足要求</td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">必修未能开齐开足，选必和选修均不满足要求</td>
|
||
</tr>
|
||
|
||
<tr>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left;"><strong>课程结构建设</strong></td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">学科类必修课程离差总和在30%以内，总体三类课程在150%以下，校本课程和综合实践较好</td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">总体三类课程离差总和在250%以下，校本课程和综合实践高于平均水平</td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">总体三类课程离差总和在300%以下，校本课程和综合实践较差</td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">总体三类课程的离差和很高，校本课程和综合实践在末尾25%</td>
|
||
</tr>
|
||
|
||
<tr>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left;"><strong>课程规范落实</strong></td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">都有建设规范文本和档案记录</td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">都有建设规范文本，但过程性档案记录已经全部建成，部分有尚未使用</td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">部分有建设规范文本，档案大部分已经建成但未使用</td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">基本没有建设规范文本，档案尚未建成</td>
|
||
</tr>
|
||
|
||
<tr>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left;"><strong>教学方式变革</strong></td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">所有老师有共识和研究，并能够系统设计、有效实施，至少有3种常态化落实形式</td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">大部分老师有共识和研究，并能够落实教材中的相关要求，至少有2种常态化落实形式</td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">个别老师有研究，并能够偶尔引导学生开展学习，至少有1种常态化落实形式</td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">基本没有教学方法等相关研究，基本不组织相关学习，没有或仅有1种落实形式</td>
|
||
</tr>
|
||
|
||
<tr>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left;"><strong>作业设计与管理变革</strong></td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">在每类创新性作业中至少掌握3种类型，作业时长有统一控制管理，定期批改评价，有多元化属性标注</td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">在每类创新性作业中至少掌握2种类型，偶有时长控制管理，面批为主，有至少两种属性标注</td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">至少掌握1种类型或擅长某1-2种创新作业，学生自己控制时长，很少反馈，有属性标注</td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">擅长某种创新作业，学生自己控制时长，几乎不反馈，无属性标注</td>
|
||
</tr>
|
||
|
||
<tr>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left;"><strong>学科发展的个性化辅导</strong></td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">各学科平均辅导时长每周2小时以上，教师根据学情确定内容，采取个别辅导方式</td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">各学科平均辅导时长每周1-2小时，教师根据学情确定内容，主要个别分散辅导</td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">各学科平均辅导时长每周1小时以内，学生提出需求后教师辅导，分组统一或分散辅导</td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">辅导时长每周1小时以内或不辅导，学生提出需求后教师辅导，班级统一辅导</td>
|
||
</tr>
|
||
|
||
<tr>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left;"><strong>学生生涯发展指导</strong></td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">专设生涯指导课程，三年覆盖90%+学生，本校+外聘教师队伍，校内外资源足够支持</td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">外请讲座实施，三年覆盖70-90%学生，外聘教师队伍，校内外资源有一些支持</td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">与社会考察/志愿服务结合实施，三年覆盖50-70%学生，外聘教师，几乎无资源支持</td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">与社会考察/志愿服务结合实施，三年覆盖50%以下，未形成稳定队伍，几乎无资源支持</td>
|
||
</tr>
|
||
|
||
<tr>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left;"><strong>培训支持</strong></td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">各学科教师平均外出培训人数≥2.5人</td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">各学科教师平均外出培训人数≥1.5人</td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">各学科教师平均外出培训人数≥1人</td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">各学科教师几乎不进行外出培训</td>
|
||
</tr>
|
||
|
||
<tr>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left;"><strong>教研支持</strong></td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">教研的数量和质量均较高</td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">有教研活动，质量较好</td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">有教研活动但质量一般</td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">活动数量和质量均较低</td>
|
||
</tr>
|
||
|
||
<tr>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left;"><strong>项目支持</strong></td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">各学科均有负责的校级以上项目至少一个</td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">有部分学科负责校级以上项目至少一个</td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">各学科没有负责的校级以上项目，部分学科有校级项目至少一个</td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">各学科校级及校级以上的项目均没有</td>
|
||
</tr>
|
||
|
||
<tr>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left;"><strong>科学评价观</strong></td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">在所有方面均能至少关注两项素养发展</td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">至少有三个方面关注两项素养发展</td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">能较多关注学生发展</td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">较少关注学生发展</td>
|
||
</tr>
|
||
|
||
<tr>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left;"><strong>学业质量评估</strong></td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">校本化评价工具已研制并使用，学期考试质量分析并标注属性较为全面</td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">校本化评价工具已研制并使用，学期考试质量分析不做硬性要求</td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">至少已研制一项校本化评价工具，学期考试质量分析不做硬性要求</td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">未能重视学业质量评估，校本化评价工具均欠缺</td>
|
||
</tr>
|
||
|
||
<tr>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left;"><strong>综合素质评估</strong></td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">校本化综合素质评价体系均有建设和使用，有平台支持且评价结果表达科学</td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">校本化综合素质评价体系均有建设和使用，支持平台和评价结果使用有待提高</td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">校本化综合素质评价方案建成，但具体评价工具有待开发</td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">未能重视校本化综合素质评价，方案、工具和结果使用等均欠缺</td>
|
||
</tr>
|
||
|
||
<tr>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left;"><strong>实践活动评估</strong></td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">研究性学习、社会考察和学科实践活动的校本化评价工具已研制并使用</td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">学科实践活动的校本化评价工具已研制并使用，研究性学习/社会考察至少一项已研制但尚未使用</td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">学科实践活动的校本化评价工具已研制</td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">研究性学习、社会考察和学科实践活动的校本化评价工具均尚未研制和使用</td>
|
||
</tr>
|
||
|
||
<tr>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left;"><strong>区域推进</strong></td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">召开会议平均一个月2次及以上，区域管理文件数量和措施均为最大值</td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">召开会议平均一个月1次及以上，区域管理文件3个以上，措施达3项</td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">召开会议、文件和措施至少有一项建设较好</td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">召开会议、文件和措施三项均建设较差</td>
|
||
</tr>
|
||
|
||
<tr>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left;"><strong>环境支持</strong></td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">信息化支持和硬件支持均处于较高水平</td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">信息化支持和硬件在平均水平附近</td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">信息化支持和硬件支持至少有一项建设较好</td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">信息化支持和硬件支持均建设较差</td>
|
||
</tr>
|
||
|
||
<tr>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left;"><strong>资源支持</strong></td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">校内外资源和师资水平均处于较高水平</td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">校内外资源至少有一项供给较好，师资水平较好</td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">校内外资源至少有一项仅略低于平均水平，师资水平略低于平均水平</td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">校内外资源和师资水平三项均建设较差</td>
|
||
</tr>
|
||
|
||
<tr>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left;"><strong>教学方式创新</strong></td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">信息技术与教学融合程度高，教师能常态化使用信息技术</td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">信息技术与教学融合程度较高，教师能使用信息技术</td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">信息技术与教学融合程度一般，学校有信息化平台建设</td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">信息技术与教学融合程度较差，教师基本不使用信息技术</td>
|
||
</tr>
|
||
|
||
<tr>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left;"><strong>评价精准化与个性化</strong></td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">有自建信息技术平台支持学科诊断与综合素质评价</td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">借助第三方平台支持学科诊断与综合素质评价</td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">有信息技术平台支持学业评价</td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">没有信息技术平台支持评价</td>
|
||
</tr>
|
||
|
||
<tr>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left;"><strong>课程迭代优化</strong></td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">学校对促进教学数字化转型有专项研修计划并开展相关活动，业务绝大部分使用信息化系统</td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">学校尚未制定专项研修计划，业务绝大部分使用信息化系统</td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">学校较少开展数字化转型活动，少数业务使用信息化系统</td>
|
||
<td style="text-align:left; font-size:12px;">学校几乎不开展数字化转型活动，尚未建成信息化管理系统</td>
|
||
</tr>
|
||
|
||
</tbody>
|
||
</table>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="section" id="part2">
|
||
<h1>第二部分 学校课程实施总体表现</h1>
|
||
|
||
<h2>一、学校课程实施总体状况</h2>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 得分卡片 -->
|
||
<div class="score-cards">
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">总体得分</div>
|
||
<div class="value">45.0</div>
|
||
<div class="diff negative">
|
||
-6.8 vs 区均值(51.8)
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">区内排名</div>
|
||
<div class="value">15/15</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">同类学校均值</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:24px">44.8</div>
|
||
<div class="diff positive">
|
||
+0.2 vs 同类
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">课程实施类型</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:16px">
|
||
<span class="type-badge weak">
|
||
待提升
|
||
</span>
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- A. 学校画像卡 + 优势-短板象限图 -->
|
||
<div class="chart-row">
|
||
<div class="chart-box">
|
||
<div id="profile-card-chart" class="chart" style="height:420px"></div>
|
||
<div class="chart-title">图2-0a 学校课程实施画像总览</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="chart-box">
|
||
<div id="quadrant-chart" class="chart" style="height:420px"></div>
|
||
<div class="chart-title">图2-0b 三级维度优势-短板象限分析</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="chart-caption">
|
||
<p>贵校课程实施总体得分为45.0分，处于"课程实施待提升类"，整体表现低于区均值且短板突出。优势集中于学生生涯发展指导（+9.8）与区域推进（+9.3）两项维度，但资源支持（-15.8）、学科发展的个性化辅导（-17.4）、作业设计与管理变革（-16.0）等多达15项三级维度显著低于区均值，亟需系统性改进。</p>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 得分对比横向条形图 + 七维度雷达图 -->
|
||
<div class="chart-row">
|
||
<div class="chart-box">
|
||
<div id="score-compare-chart" class="chart"></div>
|
||
<div class="chart-title">图2-1 课程实施七维度得分对比</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="chart-box">
|
||
<div id="radar-chart" class="chart"></div>
|
||
<div class="chart-title">图2-2 课程实施七维度雷达图</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="chart-caption">
|
||
<p>贵校课程实施七维度整体得分均低于区均值（51.8分），各维度得分介于42.0至50.0分之间。其中课程领导力（50.0分）表现相对最优，与区均值差距最小（-3.8分）；教育质量评估力（42.0分）得分最低，较区均值低11.0分，教学变革力（42.1分）与数字化赋能力（42.5分）亦处于较低水平，是贵校课程实施工作中有待重点改进的方向。</p>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 聚类类型分布 + 两类学校折线对比 -->
|
||
<div class="chart-row">
|
||
<div class="chart-box">
|
||
<div id="cluster-type-dist-chart" class="chart"></div>
|
||
<div class="chart-title">图2-3 学校课程实施总体类型分布</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="chart-box">
|
||
<div id="cluster-line-chart" class="chart"></div>
|
||
<div class="chart-title">图2-4 两类学校课程实施特征对比</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="chart-caption">
|
||
<p>贵校整体归属"课程实施待提升类"，在区内15所学校中排名第15位，各维度均有较大提升空间。相对而言，课程领导力（50.0分）、学生发展指导力（48.0分）及教育条件保障力（47.7分）是贵校得分较高的维度，可作为后续课程建设的重点支撑与突破口。</p>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 聚类类型对比雷达图 + 区内学校排名条形图 -->
|
||
<div class="chart-row">
|
||
<div class="chart-box">
|
||
<div id="cluster-radar-chart" class="chart"></div>
|
||
<div class="chart-title">图2-5 学校课程实施类型特征对比（雷达图）</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="chart-box">
|
||
<div id="school-ranking-chart" class="chart"></div>
|
||
<div class="chart-title">图2-6 区内各校总体得分排名</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="chart-caption">
|
||
<p>贵校总体得分45.0分，位列区内第15名（共15所学校），整体表现有待提升。从各维度来看，课程领导力相对突出，得分50.0分（区内第13名）；教育质量评估力为当前最薄弱环节，得分42.0分，区内排名末位，是未来重点改进的优先方向。</p>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 维度间相关性热力图 -->
|
||
<div class="chart-box">
|
||
<div id="correlation-chart" class="chart" style="height:450px"></div>
|
||
<div class="chart-title">图2-7 课程实施维度间相关性分析</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="chart-caption">
|
||
<p>各维度间呈现显著正相关关系，其中课程领导力与教育质量评估力的相关系数最高（r=0.77），课程领导力与教师发展支持力次之（r=0.75），教学变革力与教育质量评估力亦保持较强关联（r=0.66）。这表明贵校若能着力提升课程领导力，有望同步带动教育质量评估与教师发展支持等维度的协同改善，实现整体课程实施水平的联动提升。</p>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- LLM综合分析 -->
|
||
<div class="llm-analysis">
|
||
<p>
|
||
贵校本次课程实施评估总体得分为44.99分，低于杨浦区均值51.78分，差距为6.79分，在区内15所同类参评学校中位列第15名。与同类学校均值44.75分相比，贵校高出0.24分，处于同类学校的基本持平水平。根据综合评估结果，贵校被归入<strong>课程实施待提升类</strong>，整体课程实施水平尚有较大的提升空间。
|
||
</p>
|
||
<p>
|
||
从七个维度的得分分布来看，贵校在课程领导力、学生发展指导力和教育条件保障力三个维度上表现相对较好，得分分别为49.96分、47.99分和47.70分，其中课程领导力和学生发展指导力均高于同类学校均值。教学变革力和教育质量评估力两个维度表现相对较弱，得分分别为42.15分和42.00分，均低于区均值及同类学校均值，且区内排名均在第14名至第15名之间。教师发展支持力得分为42.61分，数字化赋能力得分为42.53分，两者在区内均排名第14至15名，与区均值的差距分别为8.18分和9.16分，同样处于偏低水平。
|
||
</p>
|
||
<p>
|
||
综合各维度得分来看，贵校呈现出"领导层面相对稳健、教学实践与评估层面明显偏弱"的结构性特征。课程领导力得分相对较高，反映出贵校在课程规划与顶层设计方面具有一定基础；学生发展指导力和教育条件保障力的相对较好表现，说明贵校在学生服务和基础条件方面维持了基本保障。然而，教育质量评估力、数字化赋能力、教师发展支持力以及教学变革力四个维度得分均集中在42分至43分区间，且与区均值差距均超过7分，表明贵校在课程实施的动态推进、教学方式创新及数字化转型等方面存在较为明显的短板，领导规划与教学执行之间尚未形成有效的联动与转化，这是制约贵校整体课程实施水平进一步提升的关键结构性问题。
|
||
</p>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<h2>二、分维度状况</h2>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 维度得分对比表 -->
|
||
<table class="data-table">
|
||
<thead>
|
||
<tr>
|
||
<th>维度</th>
|
||
<th>上实剑桥</th>
|
||
<th>区均值</th>
|
||
<th>同类学校均值</th>
|
||
<th>差异(vs区)</th>
|
||
<th>区内排名</th>
|
||
</tr>
|
||
</thead>
|
||
<tbody>
|
||
|
||
<tr>
|
||
<td><strong>课程领导力</strong></td>
|
||
<td>49.96</td>
|
||
<td>53.80</td>
|
||
<td>42.44</td>
|
||
<td style="color: red">
|
||
-3.84
|
||
</td>
|
||
<td>13/15</td>
|
||
</tr>
|
||
|
||
<tr>
|
||
<td><strong>教学变革力</strong></td>
|
||
<td>42.15</td>
|
||
<td>49.34</td>
|
||
<td>48.20</td>
|
||
<td style="color: red">
|
||
-7.19
|
||
</td>
|
||
<td>14/15</td>
|
||
</tr>
|
||
|
||
<tr>
|
||
<td><strong>学生发展指导力</strong></td>
|
||
<td>47.99</td>
|
||
<td>51.79</td>
|
||
<td>43.91</td>
|
||
<td style="color: red">
|
||
-3.80
|
||
</td>
|
||
<td>12/15</td>
|
||
</tr>
|
||
|
||
<tr>
|
||
<td><strong>教师发展支持力</strong></td>
|
||
<td>42.61</td>
|
||
<td>50.79</td>
|
||
<td>42.14</td>
|
||
<td style="color: red">
|
||
-8.18
|
||
</td>
|
||
<td>15/15</td>
|
||
</tr>
|
||
|
||
<tr>
|
||
<td><strong>教育质量评估力</strong></td>
|
||
<td>42.00</td>
|
||
<td>53.03</td>
|
||
<td>44.81</td>
|
||
<td style="color: red">
|
||
-11.03
|
||
</td>
|
||
<td>15/15</td>
|
||
</tr>
|
||
|
||
<tr>
|
||
<td><strong>教育条件保障力</strong></td>
|
||
<td>47.70</td>
|
||
<td>51.99</td>
|
||
<td>45.71</td>
|
||
<td style="color: red">
|
||
-4.29
|
||
</td>
|
||
<td>11/15</td>
|
||
</tr>
|
||
|
||
<tr>
|
||
<td><strong>数字化赋能力</strong></td>
|
||
<td>42.53</td>
|
||
<td>51.69</td>
|
||
<td>46.06</td>
|
||
<td style="color: red">
|
||
-9.16
|
||
</td>
|
||
<td>14/15</td>
|
||
</tr>
|
||
|
||
</tbody>
|
||
</table>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="section" id="part3">
|
||
<h1>第三部分 课程领导力表现</h1>
|
||
|
||
<h2>一、整体表现</h2>
|
||
|
||
<div class="score-cards">
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">课程领导力得分</div>
|
||
<div class="value">50.0</div>
|
||
<div class="diff negative">
|
||
-3.8 vs 区均值
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">同类学校均值</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:24px">42.4</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">区内排名</div>
|
||
<div class="value">13/15</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">维度类型</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:14px">
|
||
<span class="type-badge good">
|
||
较好
|
||
</span>
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<!-- 维度独立得分柱状图 + 子维度雷达/柱状图 -->
|
||
<div class="chart-row">
|
||
<div class="chart-box">
|
||
<div id="dim-score-part3" class="chart"></div>
|
||
<div class="chart-title">图3-1 课程领导力得分情况</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="chart-box">
|
||
<div id="sub-radar-part3" class="chart"></div>
|
||
<div class="chart-title">图3-2 课程领导力各子维度得分情况</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="chart-caption">
|
||
<p>贵校课程领导力总体得分为50.0分，低于区均值53.8分，差距为3.8分。从各子维度来看，国家标准遵循（54.3分）表现相对突出，课程规范落实（51.7分）居中，课程结构建设（44.0分）得分最低，三项子维度间最高与最低分差达10.3分，说明贵校在课程结构建设方面存在较为明显的短板，有待重点关注与提升。</p>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 子维度柱状图 + 水平分布堆叠图 -->
|
||
<div class="chart-row">
|
||
<div class="chart-box">
|
||
<div id="chart-part3" class="chart"></div>
|
||
<div class="chart-title">图3-3 课程领导力各子维度对比详情</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="chart-box">
|
||
<div id="level-part3" class="chart"></div>
|
||
<div class="chart-title">图3-4 课程领导力各子维度水平分布</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="chart-caption">
|
||
<p>贵校课程领导力各子维度发展不均衡：国家标准遵循达到水平3且高于区均值，表现相对较好；课程结构建设仅处于水平1，课程规范落实虽达水平3，但二者均低于区均值，尤其是课程结构建设有较大提升空间，是当前需重点关注和改进的薄弱环节。</p>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 聚类散点图（2D或3D） -->
|
||
<div class="chart-box">
|
||
<div id="scatter-part3" class="chart" style="height:450px"></div>
|
||
<div class="chart-title">图3-5 课程领导力聚类分析散点图</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="chart-caption">
|
||
<p>聚类分析结果显示，贵校课程领导力得分为50.0分，在区内15所学校中排名第13位，整体归属"较好"聚类类型。散点图中贵校的位置表明，尽管其聚类水平评定尚可，但在区内横向比较中仍处于相对靠后的位置，与领先学校存在一定差距，该维度有进一步提升的空间。</p>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 维度整体LLM分析 -->
|
||
<div class="llm-analysis">
|
||
<p>课程领导力聚焦学校在落实国家课程、构建核心素养导向校本课程体系方面的综合能力，涵盖国家标准遵循、课程结构建设与课程规范落实三个子维度。贵校本维度得分为49.96分，低于杨浦区均值53.80分约3.84分，但明显高于同类学校均值42.44分，在区内15所学校中位列第13名，聚类评定为"较好"水平，整体表现处于区内中下游，与同类学校相比具有一定相对优势。</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>从三个子维度的得分分布来看，贵校呈现出"两端稍高、中间偏弱"的结构特征。其中，国家标准遵循得分最高，为54.26分（水平3）；课程规范落实次之，得分51.67分（水平3）；课程结构建设得分最低，仅为43.96分（水平1），与其他两个子维度存在明显落差，是当前课程领导力整体提升的主要制约因素。三个子维度在区内排名亦呈现分化，课程规范落实相对居中（第9名），而国家标准遵循与课程结构建设均排在第14名，处于区内较后位置。</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>横向比较来看，区内排名靠前的学校在本维度上优势较为突出。同济一附（61.42分）、交大附中（61.30分）、复旦附中（58.46分）分列前三，得分均显著高于贵校；上财附中（56.85分）、控江中学（56.10分）亦处于区均值以上。贵校49.96分的表现仅略高于民星中学（48.90分）与同济中学（42.90分），在区内15所学校中处于末尾梯队，与中游学校如市东中学（52.69分）、复旦实验（51.70分）之间尚有一定差距，整体竞争压力较大。</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>针对贵校当前课程领导力的薄弱环节，有以下两点建议：其一，重点聚焦课程结构建设，该子维度得分仅43.96分且处于水平1，是三项子维度中短板最为突出的，建议贵校结合自身民办高中的办学灵活性优势，系统梳理现有课程体系，加强必修、选修及特色课程的结构化设计，提升课程多样性与层次性；其二，在保持国家标准遵循和课程规范落实相对稳定的基础上，着力将课程结构建设的水平向上突破，以带动整体维度得分向区均值靠拢，逐步缩小与中游学校的差距。</p>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 水平对比表 -->
|
||
<h3>课程领导力各子维度水平对比（表3-1）</h3>
|
||
<table class="level-table">
|
||
<thead>
|
||
<tr>
|
||
<th>子维度</th>
|
||
<th>上实剑桥</th>
|
||
<th>得分</th>
|
||
<th>区均值</th>
|
||
<th>排名</th>
|
||
</tr>
|
||
</thead>
|
||
<tbody>
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
<tr>
|
||
<td>国家标准遵循</td>
|
||
<td class="lv3">水平3</td>
|
||
<td>54.3</td>
|
||
<td>53.7</td>
|
||
<td>14/15</td>
|
||
</tr>
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
<tr>
|
||
<td>课程结构建设</td>
|
||
<td class="lv1">水平1</td>
|
||
<td>44.0</td>
|
||
<td>55.3</td>
|
||
<td>14/15</td>
|
||
</tr>
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
<tr>
|
||
<td>课程规范落实</td>
|
||
<td class="lv3">水平3</td>
|
||
<td>51.7</td>
|
||
<td>52.4</td>
|
||
<td>9/15</td>
|
||
</tr>
|
||
|
||
|
||
</tbody>
|
||
</table>
|
||
|
||
<hr class="section-divider">
|
||
|
||
<!-- 各三级维度详细分析 -->
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
<h2 id="sub-part3-1">二、国家标准遵循</h2>
|
||
|
||
<div class="score-cards" style="grid-template-columns: repeat(4, 1fr);">
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">得分</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:24px">54.3</div>
|
||
<div class="diff positive">
|
||
+0.6 vs 区均值
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">区均值</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:24px">53.7</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">水平等级</div>
|
||
<div class="level-indicator level-3">水平3</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">排名</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:24px">14/15</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- C. 温度计条形图 -->
|
||
<div class="chart-box" style="padding:10px 16px;">
|
||
<div id="thermo-part3-1" class="chart" style="height:80px"></div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 金字塔水平指示器（含各水平学校数量） -->
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-container">
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv4 dimmed">
|
||
水平四 · 0所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv3 active">
|
||
水平三 · 14所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<span class="pyramid-label"><span class="arrow">◀</span>上实剑桥</span>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv2 dimmed">
|
||
水平二 · 1所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv1 dimmed">
|
||
水平一 · 0所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<p style="text-indent:0; margin:10px 0; color: var(--gray-500); font-size:14px;">
|
||
<strong>水平3含义：</strong>考试类科目必修开齐，选必和选修满足要求
|
||
</p>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 三级维度LLM分析 -->
|
||
|
||
<div class="llm-analysis">
|
||
<p>贵校在国家标准遵循维度的得分为54.26分，略高于杨浦区均值53.68分（差异+0.58分），处于<strong>水平3</strong>。该水平意味着贵校已实现考试类科目必修课程的开齐开设，选择性必修与选修课程亦满足相关要求，总体上达到了国家课程方案的基本规范，体现了贵校在课程合规性方面的基础保障能力。</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>从杨浦区整体分布来看，区内15所学校中，达到水平3的学校共14所（占比93.3%），水平2学校1所（占比6.7%），尚无学校达到水平4，亦无学校处于水平1。贵校与区内绝大多数学校（包括复旦附中、交大附中、控江中学等13所学校）同处水平3，且得分同为54.26分，在区内14所同级学校中并列第1，仅同济中学（45.61分）处于水平2，明显低于其余学校。由此可见，贵校国家标准遵循情况处于区内主流水准，但距离最高水平（水平4）仍有提升空间。</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>值得关注的是，目前区内尚无学校达到水平4，意味着所有学科必修课程"开齐开足"这一更高标准在全区范围内均有待突破。建议贵校在现有基础上，系统梳理非考试类科目（如艺术、体育与健康、综合实践活动等）的必修课程开设情况，补全尚存缺口，着力向水平4迈进。作为民办高中，贵校课程安排具备一定灵活性，可借助这一优势，在保障国家课程完整落地的同时，率先探索全科目开齐开足的实践路径，形成示范效应。</p>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<hr class="section-divider">
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
<h2 id="sub-part3-2">三、课程结构建设</h2>
|
||
|
||
<div class="score-cards" style="grid-template-columns: repeat(4, 1fr);">
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">得分</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:24px">44.0</div>
|
||
<div class="diff negative">
|
||
-11.3 vs 区均值
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">区均值</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:24px">55.3</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">水平等级</div>
|
||
<div class="level-indicator level-1">水平1</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">排名</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:24px">14/15</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- C. 温度计条形图 -->
|
||
<div class="chart-box" style="padding:10px 16px;">
|
||
<div id="thermo-part3-2" class="chart" style="height:80px"></div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 金字塔水平指示器（含各水平学校数量） -->
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-container">
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv4 dimmed">
|
||
水平四 · 7所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv3 dimmed">
|
||
水平三 · 2所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv2 dimmed">
|
||
水平二 · 3所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv1 active">
|
||
水平一 · 3所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<span class="pyramid-label"><span class="arrow">◀</span>上实剑桥</span>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<p style="text-indent:0; margin:10px 0; color: var(--gray-500); font-size:14px;">
|
||
<strong>水平1含义：</strong>总体三类课程的离差和很高，校本课程和综合实践在末尾25%
|
||
</p>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 三级维度LLM分析 -->
|
||
|
||
<div class="llm-analysis">
|
||
<p>在课程结构建设维度，贵校得分为43.96分，低于杨浦区均值55.31分，差距达11.35分，位列区内第14名（共15所学校），处于<strong>水平1</strong>。该水平意味着贵校三类课程的整体离差总和较高，课程设置在各学科之间的比例失衡较为明显，且校本课程与综合实践课程的开设情况处于区内末尾25%，课程结构的科学性与丰富性有待系统性提升。</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>从区内整体分布来看，处于水平4（最优）的学校有7所，占比46.7%；水平3有2所，占比13.3%；水平2有3所，占比20.0%；与贵校同处水平1的学校共3所，占比20.0%。换言之，区内有80%的学校在课程结构建设方面优于贵校。具体而言，同济一附（69.35分）、交大附中（68.99分）、上财附中与控江中学（均为66.85分）等处于区内前列，与贵校差距超过20分；即便是同处中段的中原中学（52.18分）、体院附中（51.47分），也明显领先于贵校。</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>针对贵校当前所处的水平1，建议从以下两个方向着力改善：一是<strong>优化必修课程结构</strong>，系统梳理各学科课时安排，对照国家课程标准逐步缩小离差，使学科比例趋于均衡合理；二是<strong>加快校本课程与综合实践课程建设</strong>，充分发挥民办学校办学灵活的体制优势，有计划地增设具有学校特色的校本课程模块，扩大综合实践课程的覆盖面与深度，以此提升三类课程的整体丰富性，为向水平2乃至更高层级迈进奠定基础。</p>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<hr class="section-divider">
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
<h2 id="sub-part3-3">四、课程规范落实</h2>
|
||
|
||
<div class="score-cards" style="grid-template-columns: repeat(4, 1fr);">
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">得分</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:24px">51.7</div>
|
||
<div class="diff negative">
|
||
-0.7 vs 区均值
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">区均值</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:24px">52.4</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">水平等级</div>
|
||
<div class="level-indicator level-3">水平3</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">排名</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:24px">9/15</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- C. 温度计条形图 -->
|
||
<div class="chart-box" style="padding:10px 16px;">
|
||
<div id="thermo-part3-3" class="chart" style="height:80px"></div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 金字塔水平指示器（含各水平学校数量） -->
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-container">
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv4 dimmed">
|
||
水平四 · 3所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv3 active">
|
||
水平三 · 6所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<span class="pyramid-label"><span class="arrow">◀</span>上实剑桥</span>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv2 dimmed">
|
||
水平二 · 3所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv1 dimmed">
|
||
水平一 · 3所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<p style="text-indent:0; margin:10px 0; color: var(--gray-500); font-size:14px;">
|
||
<strong>水平3含义：</strong>都有建设规范文本，但过程性档案记录已经全部建成，部分有尚未使用
|
||
</p>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 三级维度LLM分析 -->
|
||
|
||
<div class="llm-analysis">
|
||
<p>在课程规范落实方面，贵校得分为51.67分，与杨浦区均值52.41分相差0.73分，处于水平3。该水平的具体表现为：贵校已具备较为完整的课程建设规范文本，过程性档案记录也已全部建成，但部分档案尚停留于"建而未用"的状态，未能有效发挥档案在课程管理与持续改进中的实质性作用。</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>从区内整体分布来看，达到水平3及以上的学校共9所，占全区的60.0%，其中水平4学校3所（占20.0%），贵校与体院附中同处水平3梯队。区内排名靠前的交大附中、同济一附、杨浦高级均以60.64分位居水平4，复旦附中、中原中学、复旦实验等校亦高于贵校，表明贵校在档案的实际应用深度上仍有一定提升空间，在区内15所学校中居第9位，整体处于中游水平。</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>建议贵校重点突破"档案使用"这一关键瓶颈。一方面，可建立档案定期调阅与反馈机制，将过程性档案纳入教研活动、课程评估和教师专业发展的常态流程，使档案真正成为课程决策的依据而非存档材料；另一方面，作为民办高中，贵校可充分利用机制灵活的优势，探索数字化档案管理平台，提高档案调取与应用的便捷性，推动课程规范管理从"有据可查"向"以据优化"迈进，力争向水平4稳步跃升。</p>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="section" id="part4">
|
||
<h1>第四部分 教学变革力表现</h1>
|
||
|
||
<h2>一、整体表现</h2>
|
||
|
||
<div class="score-cards">
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">教学变革力得分</div>
|
||
<div class="value">42.1</div>
|
||
<div class="diff negative">
|
||
-7.2 vs 区均值
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">同类学校均值</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:24px">48.2</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">区内排名</div>
|
||
<div class="value">14/15</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">维度类型</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:14px">
|
||
<span class="type-badge weak">
|
||
待提升
|
||
</span>
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<!-- 维度独立得分柱状图 + 子维度雷达/柱状图 -->
|
||
<div class="chart-row">
|
||
<div class="chart-box">
|
||
<div id="dim-score-part4" class="chart"></div>
|
||
<div class="chart-title">图4-1 教学变革力得分情况</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="chart-box">
|
||
<div id="sub-radar-part4" class="chart"></div>
|
||
<div class="chart-title">图4-2 教学变革力各子维度得分情况</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="chart-caption">
|
||
<p>贵校教学变革力总体得分为42.1分，低于区均值49.3分，差距达7.2分。从各子维度来看，教学方式变革得分相对较高（50.8分），而作业设计与管理变革得分仅为33.5分，两项子维度间分差达17.3分，表明贵校在作业设计与管理变革方面存在明显短板，是未来提升教学变革力的重点发力方向。</p>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 子维度柱状图 + 水平分布堆叠图 -->
|
||
<div class="chart-row">
|
||
<div class="chart-box">
|
||
<div id="chart-part4" class="chart"></div>
|
||
<div class="chart-title">图4-3 教学变革力各子维度对比详情</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="chart-box">
|
||
<div id="level-part4" class="chart"></div>
|
||
<div class="chart-title">图4-4 教学变革力各子维度水平分布</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="chart-caption">
|
||
<p>贵校教学变革力各子维度发展呈现明显分化：教学方式变革达到水平3，高于区均值，表现相对突出；而作业设计与管理变革仅处于水平1，低于区均值，是当前教学变革力提升的主要短板，亟需重点关注与改进。</p>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 聚类散点图（2D或3D） -->
|
||
<div class="chart-box">
|
||
<div id="scatter-part4" class="chart" style="height:450px"></div>
|
||
<div class="chart-title">图4-5 教学变革力聚类分析散点图</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="chart-caption">
|
||
<p>聚类分析结果显示，贵校教学变革力得分为42.1分，在区内15所学校中排名第14，归属"待提升"类型，整体处于区内较低水平。散点图中贵校所处位置直观反映出其与区内领先学校之间存在明显差距，教学变革能力有较大的提升空间。</p>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 维度整体LLM分析 -->
|
||
<div class="llm-analysis">
|
||
<p>教学变革力反映学校由知识本位向素养本位转型的整体能力，涵盖教学方式变革与作业设计及管理变革两个核心层面。贵校在该维度的得分为42.15分，低于杨浦区均值49.34分（差距7.19分），亦低于同类学校均值48.20分，整体处于待提升聚类，尚有较大的改进空间。</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>从两个子维度的得分分布来看，贵校呈现出较为明显的内部落差。教学方式变革得分为50.78分，达到水平3，区内排名第10位，表现相对稳定，处于中等水平；作业设计与管理变革得分仅为33.52分，位于水平1，区内排名末位（第15名），是拉低整体维度得分的主要因素。两个子维度之间的分差达17.26分，显示出贵校在教学变革层面发展不均衡的特征，教学方式的探索已有一定积累，但作业层面的系统性变革仍处于起步阶段。</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>从区内横向比较来看，贵校42.15分的得分在15所学校中排名第14位，仅高于市东中学（29.56分）。排名靠前的学校中，同济一附（59.15分）、体院附中（58.18分）、交大附中（57.93分）均超过57分，与贵校差距超过15分；即便是区内中游学校，如控江中学（48.39分）、复旦实验（47.51分）、上理少云（46.49分），得分也均高于贵校。民星中学（45.20分）与贵校得分接近，二者同处区内后段梯队。整体来看，贵校在该维度的区内竞争中处于明显劣势位置。</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>结合数据表现，建议贵校将作业设计与管理变革作为近期重点突破方向。一方面，可系统梳理现有作业布置的结构与总量，建立分层、减负、增效的作业设计机制，推动从题量驱动向质量导向转变；另一方面，可借鉴区内在该子维度表现较好的学校经验，逐步探索跨学科作业、项目式作业等多元形式，以作业设计的变革带动学生学习方式的整体转型。作为民办高中，贵校在课程与教学管理上具备一定灵活性，这为推进相关改革提供了有利条件。</p>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 水平对比表 -->
|
||
<h3>教学变革力各子维度水平对比（表4-1）</h3>
|
||
<table class="level-table">
|
||
<thead>
|
||
<tr>
|
||
<th>子维度</th>
|
||
<th>上实剑桥</th>
|
||
<th>得分</th>
|
||
<th>区均值</th>
|
||
<th>排名</th>
|
||
</tr>
|
||
</thead>
|
||
<tbody>
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
<tr>
|
||
<td>教学方式变革</td>
|
||
<td class="lv3">水平3</td>
|
||
<td>50.8</td>
|
||
<td>49.2</td>
|
||
<td>10/15</td>
|
||
</tr>
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
<tr>
|
||
<td>作业设计与管理变革</td>
|
||
<td class="lv1">水平1</td>
|
||
<td>33.5</td>
|
||
<td>49.5</td>
|
||
<td>15/15</td>
|
||
</tr>
|
||
|
||
|
||
</tbody>
|
||
</table>
|
||
|
||
<hr class="section-divider">
|
||
|
||
<!-- 各三级维度详细分析 -->
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
<h2 id="sub-part4-1">二、教学方式变革</h2>
|
||
|
||
<div class="score-cards" style="grid-template-columns: repeat(4, 1fr);">
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">得分</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:24px">50.8</div>
|
||
<div class="diff positive">
|
||
+1.6 vs 区均值
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">区均值</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:24px">49.2</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">水平等级</div>
|
||
<div class="level-indicator level-3">水平3</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">排名</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:24px">10/15</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- C. 温度计条形图 -->
|
||
<div class="chart-box" style="padding:10px 16px;">
|
||
<div id="thermo-part4-1" class="chart" style="height:80px"></div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 金字塔水平指示器（含各水平学校数量） -->
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-container">
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv4 dimmed">
|
||
水平四 · 4所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv3 active">
|
||
水平三 · 8所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<span class="pyramid-label"><span class="arrow">◀</span>上实剑桥</span>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv2 dimmed">
|
||
水平二 · 2所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv1 dimmed">
|
||
水平一 · 1所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<p style="text-indent:0; margin:10px 0; color: var(--gray-500); font-size:14px;">
|
||
<strong>水平3含义：</strong>大部分老师有共识和研究，并能够落实教材中的相关要求，至少有2种常态化落实形式
|
||
</p>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 三级维度LLM分析 -->
|
||
|
||
<div class="llm-analysis">
|
||
<p>在教学方式变革维度，贵校得分为<strong>50.78分</strong>，高于杨浦区均值49.19分（<strong>+1.59分</strong>），处于<strong>水平3</strong>。该水平意味着贵校大部分教师已就主动学习、探究合作等教学理念形成共识并开展研究，能够落实教材中的相关要求，且具备至少2种常态化落实形式，具备一定的教学变革基础。</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>从区内整体分布来看，杨浦区15所学校中处于水平3及以上的学校共计<strong>12所</strong>，占比达<strong>80%</strong>，其中水平4学校4所（占26.7%）。贵校在区内排名第<strong>10位</strong>，得分与复旦附中（50.99分）、上财附中（51.27分）较为接近，但与区内领先学校如杨浦高级（56.92分）、交大附中（54.36分）相比仍存在一定差距，提升空间较为明显。</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>贵校作为民办高中，在办学机制上具备较强灵活性，建议以此为优势着力推动教学方式向水平4迈进。具体而言，可在现有常态化形式基础上，进一步拓展第三种及以上的落实路径，例如系统推进跨学科项目化学习，将信息技术工具嵌入日常课堂设计；同时建立全员参与的教研机制，促进教师从"个人探索"转向"团队共识"，实现教学变革的整体性、系统性提升，推动更多教师从"大部分"走向"全体"的共识覆盖。</p>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<hr class="section-divider">
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
<h2 id="sub-part4-2">三、作业设计与管理变革</h2>
|
||
|
||
<div class="score-cards" style="grid-template-columns: repeat(4, 1fr);">
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">得分</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:24px">33.5</div>
|
||
<div class="diff negative">
|
||
-16.0 vs 区均值
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">区均值</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:24px">49.5</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">水平等级</div>
|
||
<div class="level-indicator level-1">水平1</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">排名</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:24px">15/15</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- C. 温度计条形图 -->
|
||
<div class="chart-box" style="padding:10px 16px;">
|
||
<div id="thermo-part4-2" class="chart" style="height:80px"></div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 金字塔水平指示器（含各水平学校数量） -->
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-container">
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv4 dimmed">
|
||
水平四 · 5所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv3 dimmed">
|
||
水平三 · 1所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv2 dimmed">
|
||
水平二 · 3所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv1 active">
|
||
水平一 · 6所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<span class="pyramid-label"><span class="arrow">◀</span>上实剑桥</span>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<p style="text-indent:0; margin:10px 0; color: var(--gray-500); font-size:14px;">
|
||
<strong>水平1含义：</strong>擅长某种创新作业，学生自己控制时长，几乎不反馈，无属性标注
|
||
</p>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 三级维度LLM分析 -->
|
||
|
||
<div class="llm-analysis">
|
||
<p>贵校在作业设计与管理变革维度的得分为<strong>33.52分</strong>，低于杨浦区均值49.50分，差距达15.98分，整体处于<strong>水平1</strong>。该水平的具体表现为：贵校虽在某种创新性作业类型上具备一定积累，但作业时长主要由学生自行掌控，缺乏校级层面的统一管理机制；批改反馈频次极低，几乎未形成常态化反馈闭环；在作业属性标注方面也尚属空白，系统化程度有待大幅提升。</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>从区内整体分布来看，处于水平1的学校共6所，占比40.0%，贵校位列其中，且以<strong>33.52分排名区内第15位（末位）</strong>，是全区得分最低的学校。目前，达到水平2及以上的学校合计占比60.0%，达到水平4的学校有5所（占33.3%），包括同济一附（66.49分）、体院附中（63.43分）、交大附中（61.51分）等，与贵校差距悬殊，提升空间十分显著。</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>针对贵校当前水平，建议从以下路径逐步推进：<strong>第一步</strong>，在已有创新作业类型的基础上，向水平2迈进，补充至少1-2种创新作业形式，同步引入基础性作业属性标注（如难度、学科素养指向等）；<strong>第二步</strong>，建立学段或年级层面的作业时长管控机制，并将批改反馈纳入教研常规，从"几乎不反馈"向"定期评价"转变。作为民办高中，贵校在机制灵活性上具备先天优势，可优先在某一年级或学科组试点，形成可推广的作业管理范式，逐步向水平3乃至水平4靠拢。</p>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="section" id="part5">
|
||
<h1>第五部分 学生发展指导力表现</h1>
|
||
|
||
<h2>一、整体表现</h2>
|
||
|
||
<div class="score-cards">
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">学生发展指导力得分</div>
|
||
<div class="value">48.0</div>
|
||
<div class="diff negative">
|
||
-3.8 vs 区均值
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">同类学校均值</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:24px">43.9</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">区内排名</div>
|
||
<div class="value">12/15</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">维度类型</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:14px">
|
||
<span class="type-badge good">
|
||
较好
|
||
</span>
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<!-- 维度独立得分柱状图 + 子维度雷达/柱状图 -->
|
||
<div class="chart-row">
|
||
<div class="chart-box">
|
||
<div id="dim-score-part5" class="chart"></div>
|
||
<div class="chart-title">图5-1 学生发展指导力得分情况</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="chart-box">
|
||
<div id="sub-radar-part5" class="chart"></div>
|
||
<div class="chart-title">图5-2 学生发展指导力各子维度得分情况</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="chart-caption">
|
||
<p>贵校学生发展指导力总体得分为48.0分，低于区均值51.8分，差距3.8分。两项子维度表现分化明显：学生生涯发展指导得分61.2分，处于相对较高水平；而学科发展的个性化辅导仅得34.8分，两者相差26.3分，后者是拉低整体得分的关键短板，亟需重点关注与改进。</p>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 子维度柱状图 + 水平分布堆叠图 -->
|
||
<div class="chart-row">
|
||
<div class="chart-box">
|
||
<div id="chart-part5" class="chart"></div>
|
||
<div class="chart-title">图5-3 学生发展指导力各子维度对比详情</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="chart-box">
|
||
<div id="level-part5" class="chart"></div>
|
||
<div class="chart-title">图5-4 学生发展指导力各子维度水平分布</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="chart-caption">
|
||
<p>贵校教师在学生发展指导力各子维度上呈现明显分化：学生生涯发展指导表现突出，达到水平4且高于区均值；而学科发展的个性化辅导相对薄弱，仅处于水平1且低于区均值，两者差距显著，建议重点加强教师在学科个性化辅导方面的专业能力培养。</p>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 聚类散点图（2D或3D） -->
|
||
<div class="chart-box">
|
||
<div id="scatter-part5" class="chart" style="height:450px"></div>
|
||
<div class="chart-title">图5-5 学生发展指导力聚类分析散点图</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="chart-caption">
|
||
<p>散点图呈现了区内各校学生发展指导力的聚类分布情况，贵校在该维度得分为48.0分，区内排名第12位（共15所），整体处于"较好"聚类层级。尽管聚类水平相对积极，但排名位于区内中后段，表明贵校在学生发展指导力方面仍有较大的提升空间。</p>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 维度整体LLM分析 -->
|
||
<div class="llm-analysis">
|
||
<p>学生发展指导力聚焦于学校为学生提供全面、个性化发展支持的整体能力，涵盖学科学习的精准辅导与面向未来的生涯规划两大核心领域。贵校在该维度的得分为47.99分，低于杨浦区均值51.79分约3.80分，但高于同类学校均值43.91分约4.08分，在区内15所高中中位列第12名，聚类评定为"较好"水平，整体表现呈现出高于同类、低于全区的结构性特征。</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>从两个子维度的得分分布来看，贵校内部呈现出较为显著的分化态势。学生生涯发展指导得分为61.16分，达到水平4，区内排名第3名，是贵校在本维度中的突出优势所在；而学科发展的个性化辅导得分仅为34.82分，处于水平1，区内排名第15名，位居末位，是拉低整体维度得分的主要短板。两个子维度之间存在逾26分的差距，反映出贵校在学生发展指导工作上的结构性不均衡，优势与短板均较为突出。</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>横向与区内其他学校比较，贵校47.99分的总分低于排名前列的同济一附（60.36分）、上理少云（60.01分）、上理附中（56.10分）和复旦附中（55.89分），与中间段的上财附中（48.90分）、市东中学（48.67分）差距较小，略高于杨浦高级（47.16分）、交大附中（46.47分）和复旦实验（45.37分）。值得注意的是，贵校在生涯发展指导单项上以61.16分位居区内第3名，超越了绝大多数综合得分高于贵校的学校，体现出贵校在该领域具备相对突出的竞争力；而学科个性化辅导的区内末位表现，则是拉开与前列学校差距的核心因素。</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>基于以上数据，建议贵校将学科发展的个性化辅导作为近期重点改进方向。一方面，可借助民办学校机制灵活的优势，系统梳理现有学科辅导的覆盖范围与精准度，探索建立以学情诊断为基础的分层辅导机制，重点提升对学业困难学生和学有余力学生的差异化支持能力；另一方面，可尝试将贵校在生涯发展指导方面积累的经验与工作机制，与学科辅导工作形成联动，通过"学科能力—升学路径"的整合视角，增强学科辅导的目标导向性和实效性，从而带动整体维度得分的均衡提升。</p>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 水平对比表 -->
|
||
<h3>学生发展指导力各子维度水平对比（表5-1）</h3>
|
||
<table class="level-table">
|
||
<thead>
|
||
<tr>
|
||
<th>子维度</th>
|
||
<th>上实剑桥</th>
|
||
<th>得分</th>
|
||
<th>区均值</th>
|
||
<th>排名</th>
|
||
</tr>
|
||
</thead>
|
||
<tbody>
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
<tr>
|
||
<td>学科发展的个性化辅导</td>
|
||
<td class="lv1">水平1</td>
|
||
<td>34.8</td>
|
||
<td>52.2</td>
|
||
<td>15/15</td>
|
||
</tr>
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
<tr>
|
||
<td>学生生涯发展指导</td>
|
||
<td class="lv4">水平4</td>
|
||
<td>61.2</td>
|
||
<td>51.4</td>
|
||
<td>3/15</td>
|
||
</tr>
|
||
|
||
|
||
</tbody>
|
||
</table>
|
||
|
||
<hr class="section-divider">
|
||
|
||
<!-- 各三级维度详细分析 -->
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
<h2 id="sub-part5-1">二、学科发展的个性化辅导</h2>
|
||
|
||
<div class="score-cards" style="grid-template-columns: repeat(4, 1fr);">
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">得分</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:24px">34.8</div>
|
||
<div class="diff negative">
|
||
-17.4 vs 区均值
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">区均值</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:24px">52.2</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">水平等级</div>
|
||
<div class="level-indicator level-1">水平1</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">排名</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:24px">15/15</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- C. 温度计条形图 -->
|
||
<div class="chart-box" style="padding:10px 16px;">
|
||
<div id="thermo-part5-1" class="chart" style="height:80px"></div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 金字塔水平指示器（含各水平学校数量） -->
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-container">
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv4 dimmed">
|
||
水平四 · 1所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv3 dimmed">
|
||
水平三 · 9所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv2 dimmed">
|
||
水平二 · 3所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv1 active">
|
||
水平一 · 2所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<span class="pyramid-label"><span class="arrow">◀</span>上实剑桥</span>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<p style="text-indent:0; margin:10px 0; color: var(--gray-500); font-size:14px;">
|
||
<strong>水平1含义：</strong>辅导时长每周1小时以内或不辅导，学生提出需求后教师辅导，班级统一辅导
|
||
</p>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 三级维度LLM分析 -->
|
||
|
||
<div class="llm-analysis">
|
||
<p>在学科发展的个性化辅导维度，贵校得分为<strong>34.82分</strong>，低于杨浦区均值52.18分，差距达17.36分，处于<strong>水平1</strong>。该水平意味着贵校目前各学科辅导时长普遍在每周1小时以内乃至缺乏系统辅导安排，辅导的启动主要依赖学生主动提出需求，且辅导形式以班级统一辅导为主，尚未实现精准识别学情、因材施教的个性化辅导机制。</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>从区内分布来看，杨浦区15所学校中，处于水平3及以上的学校共计10所，占比高达<strong>66.7%</strong>；水平2学校3所，占比20%；仅有2所学校（含贵校）处于水平1，占比13.3%。贵校以34.82分位列区内<strong>第15名</strong>，与第14名交大附中（42.72分）相差约8分，与区内领先的上理少云（64.33分）、同济一附（59.56分）差距显著，整体处于明显落后的位置。</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>鉴于贵校目前处于水平1，建议重点从以下三个层面推进提升：<strong>首先</strong>，在辅导时长上建立制度保障，将各学科每周辅导时长逐步提升至1小时以上，形成常态化安排；<strong>其次</strong>，在辅导触发机制上，由被动响应转为主动干预，教师依据日常学情数据主动识别需辅导学生；<strong>第三</strong>，在辅导形式上逐步打破班级统一模式，探索小组分层辅导乃至一对一个别辅导，充分发挥民办学校机制灵活的优势，精准回应不同学生的学科发展需求。</p>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<hr class="section-divider">
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
<h2 id="sub-part5-2">三、学生生涯发展指导</h2>
|
||
|
||
<div class="score-cards" style="grid-template-columns: repeat(4, 1fr);">
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">得分</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:24px">61.2</div>
|
||
<div class="diff positive">
|
||
+9.8 vs 区均值
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">区均值</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:24px">51.4</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">水平等级</div>
|
||
<div class="level-indicator level-4">水平4</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">排名</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:24px">3/15</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- C. 温度计条形图 -->
|
||
<div class="chart-box" style="padding:10px 16px;">
|
||
<div id="thermo-part5-2" class="chart" style="height:80px"></div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 金字塔水平指示器（含各水平学校数量） -->
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-container">
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv4 active">
|
||
水平四 · 4所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<span class="pyramid-label"><span class="arrow">◀</span>上实剑桥</span>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv3 dimmed">
|
||
水平三 · 6所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv2 dimmed">
|
||
水平二 · 3所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv1 dimmed">
|
||
水平一 · 2所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<p style="text-indent:0; margin:10px 0; color: var(--gray-500); font-size:14px;">
|
||
<strong>水平4含义：</strong>专设生涯指导课程，三年覆盖90%+学生，本校+外聘教师队伍，校内外资源足够支持
|
||
</p>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 三级维度LLM分析 -->
|
||
|
||
<div class="llm-analysis">
|
||
<p>贵校在学生生涯发展指导维度得分为<strong>61.16分</strong>，高于杨浦区均值51.40分，领先幅度达<strong>+9.76分</strong>，处于<strong>水平4</strong>。该水平意味着贵校已专门开设生涯指导课程，三年累计覆盖率达90%以上，构建了本校教师与外聘教师相结合的复合型师资队伍，并能调动校内外充足资源为生涯教育提供有效支撑，整体实施体系较为完善。</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>从区内水平分布来看，全区15所学校中达到水平4的共<strong>4所（占26.7%）</strong>，贵校位列其中，区内排名第<strong>3位</strong>，与同济一附中、复旦附中并列得分。超过半数学校（水平1+水平2共5所，占33.3%）尚处于依托社会考察或志愿服务零散开展生涯教育的阶段，覆盖率和师资稳定性均明显不足；水平3的6所学校（占40.0%）虽已引入外请讲座，但系统化程度仍与贵校存在差距，贵校的综合实施水平在全区具有显著优势。</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>贵校已建立起相对成熟的生涯教育体系，建议在此基础上进一步<strong>深化课程内涵</strong>，将生涯探索与学生个性化升学规划有机结合，形成分年级、递进式的课程序列；同时可探索建立<strong>生涯导师制</strong>，推动外聘资源与校内辅导员协同配合，提升一对一或小组指导的覆盖质量；此外，建议系统整理贵校生涯教育实践案例，形成可复用的校本资源库，进一步巩固并彰显民办学校在办学灵活性方面的特色优势。</p>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="section" id="part6">
|
||
<h1>第六部分 教师发展支持力表现</h1>
|
||
|
||
<h2>一、整体表现</h2>
|
||
|
||
<div class="score-cards">
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">教师发展支持力得分</div>
|
||
<div class="value">42.6</div>
|
||
<div class="diff negative">
|
||
-8.2 vs 区均值
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">同类学校均值</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:24px">42.1</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">区内排名</div>
|
||
<div class="value">15/15</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">维度类型</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:14px">
|
||
<span class="type-badge weak">
|
||
待提升
|
||
</span>
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<!-- 维度独立得分柱状图 + 子维度雷达/柱状图 -->
|
||
<div class="chart-row">
|
||
<div class="chart-box">
|
||
<div id="dim-score-part6" class="chart"></div>
|
||
<div class="chart-title">图6-1 教师发展支持力得分情况</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="chart-box">
|
||
<div id="sub-radar-part6" class="chart"></div>
|
||
<div class="chart-title">图6-2 教师发展支持力各子维度得分情况</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="chart-caption">
|
||
<p>贵校教师发展支持力总体得分为42.6分，低于区均值50.8分，差距达8.2分，整体支持水平有待提升。从各子维度来看，培训支持（46.4分）、项目支持（42.4分）、教研支持（39.1分）均存在不同程度的不足，其中教研支持得分最低，与最高子维度培训支持相差7.3分，反映出贵校在教研层面的支持投入尤为薄弱，是当前改进的重点方向。</p>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 子维度柱状图 + 水平分布堆叠图 -->
|
||
<div class="chart-row">
|
||
<div class="chart-box">
|
||
<div id="chart-part6" class="chart"></div>
|
||
<div class="chart-title">图6-3 教师发展支持力各子维度对比详情</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="chart-box">
|
||
<div id="level-part6" class="chart"></div>
|
||
<div class="chart-title">图6-4 教师发展支持力各子维度水平分布</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="chart-caption">
|
||
<p>贵校教师发展支持力各子维度整体表现偏弱，培训支持、教研支持与项目支持三项均处于水平1，且全部低于区均值，无任何子维度达到或超过区域平均水平，反映出学校在教师专业发展的制度性支持方面存在较为明显的短板，亟需在培训资源配置、教研活动组织及专项发展项目推进等方面加以系统改善。</p>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 聚类散点图（2D或3D） -->
|
||
<div class="chart-box">
|
||
<div id="scatter-part6" class="chart" style="height:450px"></div>
|
||
<div class="chart-title">图6-5 教师发展支持力聚类分析散点图</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="chart-caption">
|
||
<p>散点图呈现了区内各校在教师发展支持力维度上的分布格局，贵校得分42.6分，区内排名第15位（末位），聚类类型被划定为"待提升"，在所有参评学校中处于较低水平，与区内领先学校存在明显差距，该维度是贵校当前最需重点关注与改进的领域之一。</p>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 维度整体LLM分析 -->
|
||
<div class="llm-analysis">
|
||
<p>教师发展支持力反映学校在教师专业成长方面的制度保障与资源投入水平，涵盖培训支持、教研支持与项目支持三个子维度。贵校在该维度的得分为42.61分，低于杨浦区均值50.79分，差距达8.18分；与同类学校均值（42.14分）相比基本持平，略高出0.47分，整体处于聚类"待提升"层级。</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>从各子维度得分分布来看，三项均处于水平1，整体偏低且较为均匀，未出现明显的强弱分化。其中培训支持得分相对最高（46.35分），在三个子维度中构成贵校的相对优势；教研支持得分最低（39.09分），与培训支持相差约7分，是当前整体支持力不足的主要拉低因素；项目支持居中（42.40分），三项合计反映出贵校在教师发展支持的各环节均存在较大提升空间。</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>从区内横向比较来看，贵校以42.61分位列杨浦区15所学校末位，与排名首位的交大附中（65.14分）相差逾22分，与第二位的复旦附中（63.48分）差距亦超过20分。即便与区内中段学校相比，贵校也存在一定距离，如同济中学（45.85分）、民星中学（45.54分）、复旦实验（45.32分）等得分均高于贵校。值得注意的是，排名相近的体院附中（43.18分）与贵校差距较小，显示贵校在该维度处于区内相对薄弱的位置。</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>针对当前数据表现，建议贵校优先聚焦以下两个方面加以改进：其一，着力补强教研支持短板，可依托民办学校的机制灵活性，建立校本教研常态化制度，如设置固定教研时间、引入校外专家联合开展课例研究，以提升教研活动的频次与质量；其二，加大项目支持力度，积极争取或设立教师发展专项项目，为教师提供参与课题研究、跨校交流及专项培养的机会，逐步完善多元发展路径，从而整体提升该维度的支持水平。</p>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 水平对比表 -->
|
||
<h3>教师发展支持力各子维度水平对比（表6-1）</h3>
|
||
<table class="level-table">
|
||
<thead>
|
||
<tr>
|
||
<th>子维度</th>
|
||
<th>上实剑桥</th>
|
||
<th>得分</th>
|
||
<th>区均值</th>
|
||
<th>排名</th>
|
||
</tr>
|
||
</thead>
|
||
<tbody>
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
<tr>
|
||
<td>培训支持</td>
|
||
<td class="lv1">水平1</td>
|
||
<td>46.4</td>
|
||
<td>55.4</td>
|
||
<td>11/15</td>
|
||
</tr>
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
<tr>
|
||
<td>教研支持</td>
|
||
<td class="lv1">水平1</td>
|
||
<td>39.1</td>
|
||
<td>46.5</td>
|
||
<td>14/15</td>
|
||
</tr>
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
<tr>
|
||
<td>项目支持</td>
|
||
<td class="lv1">水平1</td>
|
||
<td>42.4</td>
|
||
<td>50.4</td>
|
||
<td>15/15</td>
|
||
</tr>
|
||
|
||
|
||
</tbody>
|
||
</table>
|
||
|
||
<hr class="section-divider">
|
||
|
||
<!-- 各三级维度详细分析 -->
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
<h2 id="sub-part6-1">二、培训支持</h2>
|
||
|
||
<div class="score-cards" style="grid-template-columns: repeat(4, 1fr);">
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">得分</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:24px">46.4</div>
|
||
<div class="diff negative">
|
||
-9.1 vs 区均值
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">区均值</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:24px">55.4</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">水平等级</div>
|
||
<div class="level-indicator level-1">水平1</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">排名</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:24px">11/15</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- C. 温度计条形图 -->
|
||
<div class="chart-box" style="padding:10px 16px;">
|
||
<div id="thermo-part6-1" class="chart" style="height:80px"></div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 金字塔水平指示器（含各水平学校数量） -->
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-container">
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv4 dimmed">
|
||
水平四 · 8所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv3 dimmed">
|
||
水平三 · 1所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv2 dimmed">
|
||
水平二 · 0所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv1 active">
|
||
水平一 · 6所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<span class="pyramid-label"><span class="arrow">◀</span>上实剑桥</span>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<p style="text-indent:0; margin:10px 0; color: var(--gray-500); font-size:14px;">
|
||
<strong>水平1含义：</strong>各学科教师几乎不进行外出培训
|
||
</p>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 三级维度LLM分析 -->
|
||
|
||
<div class="llm-analysis">
|
||
<p>贵校培训支持维度得分为46.35分，低于杨浦区均值55.44分，差距达9.09分，在区内15所学校中位列第11名。依据评估标准，贵校处于<strong>水平1</strong>，意味着各学科教师几乎不进行外出培训，外出研修机会的供给整体处于较低水平，教师通过校外专业学习获得成长的渠道明显受限。</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>从区内水平分布来看，处于水平4的学校共8所，占区内总数的53.3%，处于水平3的学校1所，即超过六成的学校已为教师提供较为充足的外出培训机会。反观贵校所在的水平1，共有6所学校，占比40.0%，贵校在这一梯队中得分亦处于中游偏低位置。横向比较来看，复旦附中（80.17分）、交大附中（73.77分）、控江中学（67.38分）等学校均达到水平4，在外出培训资源投入上与贵校存在较大落差。</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>作为民办高中，贵校在办学机制上具有一定灵活性，可充分利用这一优势，有针对性地拓展教师外出培训渠道。建议从以下方面着手：一是将外出培训纳入年度教师发展规划，明确各学科最低外出研修人次指标，逐步向每人每年至少一次靠拢；二是优先安排骨干教师及青年教师参加市级、区级学科教研活动与专项培训，以点带面扩大辐射效果；三是积极争取与高校、教育机构的合作资源，降低培训成本的同时提升培训质量，推动贵校培训支持水平向水平2乃至水平3稳步提升。</p>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<hr class="section-divider">
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
<h2 id="sub-part6-2">三、教研支持</h2>
|
||
|
||
<div class="score-cards" style="grid-template-columns: repeat(4, 1fr);">
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">得分</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:24px">39.1</div>
|
||
<div class="diff negative">
|
||
-7.5 vs 区均值
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">区均值</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:24px">46.5</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">水平等级</div>
|
||
<div class="level-indicator level-1">水平1</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">排名</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:24px">14/15</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- C. 温度计条形图 -->
|
||
<div class="chart-box" style="padding:10px 16px;">
|
||
<div id="thermo-part6-2" class="chart" style="height:80px"></div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 金字塔水平指示器（含各水平学校数量） -->
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-container">
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv4 dimmed">
|
||
水平四 · 2所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv3 dimmed">
|
||
水平三 · 1所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv2 dimmed">
|
||
水平二 · 1所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv1 active">
|
||
水平一 · 11所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<span class="pyramid-label"><span class="arrow">◀</span>上实剑桥</span>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<p style="text-indent:0; margin:10px 0; color: var(--gray-500); font-size:14px;">
|
||
<strong>水平1含义：</strong>活动数量和质量均较低
|
||
</p>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 三级维度LLM分析 -->
|
||
|
||
<div class="llm-analysis">
|
||
<p>在教研支持维度，贵校得分为39.09分，低于杨浦区均值46.54分，差距达7.45分，在区内15所学校中位列第14名，处于<strong>水平1</strong>。该水平意味着贵校当前教研活动在数量和质量两个维度均处于较低状态，教研文化的深度与教研机制的有效性有待系统性提升。</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>从区内整体分布来看，73.3%的学校（共11所）同处水平1，说明教研支持在全区范围内普遍面临挑战。尽管如此，仍有26.7%的学校达到水平2及以上，其中交大附中（61.0分）、复旦附中（58.19分）、同济一附（52.81分）、控江中学（49.98分）等校得分明显领先。贵校得分在区内处于后段位，与区内领先学校差距较为显著，亟需关注。</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>针对贵校当前现状，建议从以下路径推进改善：首先，在<strong>数量层面</strong>建立常态化教研机制，明确教研活动的频次要求，确保各学科备课组定期开展集体教研；其次，在<strong>质量层面</strong>引导教研活动从形式化转向问题导向，围绕课堂教学真实困境设计研讨议题，形成"发现问题—研究对策—反馈改进"的闭环机制；此外，作为民办学校，贵校可充分发挥机制灵活优势，积极引入校外专家资源或与兄弟学校开展联合教研，逐步提升教研文化的实质深度，力争在中短期内迈入水平2以上层级。</p>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<hr class="section-divider">
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
<h2 id="sub-part6-3">四、项目支持</h2>
|
||
|
||
<div class="score-cards" style="grid-template-columns: repeat(4, 1fr);">
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">得分</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:24px">42.4</div>
|
||
<div class="diff negative">
|
||
-8.0 vs 区均值
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">区均值</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:24px">50.4</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">水平等级</div>
|
||
<div class="level-indicator level-1">水平1</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">排名</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:24px">15/15</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- C. 温度计条形图 -->
|
||
<div class="chart-box" style="padding:10px 16px;">
|
||
<div id="thermo-part6-3" class="chart" style="height:80px"></div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 金字塔水平指示器（含各水平学校数量） -->
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-container">
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv4 dimmed">
|
||
水平四 · 3所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv3 dimmed">
|
||
水平三 · 4所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv2 dimmed">
|
||
水平二 · 6所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv1 active">
|
||
水平一 · 2所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<span class="pyramid-label"><span class="arrow">◀</span>上实剑桥</span>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<p style="text-indent:0; margin:10px 0; color: var(--gray-500); font-size:14px;">
|
||
<strong>水平1含义：</strong>各学科校级及校级以上的项目均没有
|
||
</p>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 三级维度LLM分析 -->
|
||
|
||
<div class="llm-analysis">
|
||
<p>贵校在项目支持维度的得分为42.40分，低于杨浦区均值50.40分，差距达8.00分，在区内15所学校中位列第15名，处于水平1。水平1意味着贵校各学科目前均未设立校级及校级以上的课题项目，尚未形成以项目研究引领教师专业发展的机制。</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>从区内水平分布来看，处于水平2及以上的学校共13所，占比达86.7%，处于水平3及以上的学校占比为46.7%，仅有2所学校（占比13.3%）与贵校同处水平1。对标区内其他学校，交大附中（60.64分）、杨浦高级（59.00分）、中原中学（58.36分）等学校已实现各学科均有校级以上项目覆盖，即便是得分相近的控江中学（45.82分）和民星中学（46.39分），也已有部分学科建立了校级项目体系，贵校在该维度的差距较为明显。</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>建议贵校将课题项目建设作为近期教师发展的重要突破口。第一步，可优先遴选1至2个基础较强的学科，支持骨干教师申报区级或校级课题，以点带面形成示范效应；第二步，逐步建立校级课题立项与管理制度，为各学科参与项目研究提供制度保障与经费支持；第三步，依托民办学校机制灵活的优势，积极争取与高校、科研机构合作，拓展课题来源渠道，实现从"无项目"到"有覆盖"的跨越，为教师专业成长提供持续驱动力。</p>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="section" id="part7">
|
||
<h1>第七部分 教育质量评估力表现</h1>
|
||
|
||
<h2>一、整体表现</h2>
|
||
|
||
<div class="score-cards">
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">教育质量评估力得分</div>
|
||
<div class="value">42.0</div>
|
||
<div class="diff negative">
|
||
-11.0 vs 区均值
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">同类学校均值</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:24px">44.8</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">区内排名</div>
|
||
<div class="value">15/15</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">维度类型</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:14px">
|
||
<span class="type-badge weak">
|
||
待提升
|
||
</span>
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<!-- 维度独立得分柱状图 + 子维度雷达/柱状图 -->
|
||
<div class="chart-row">
|
||
<div class="chart-box">
|
||
<div id="dim-score-part7" class="chart"></div>
|
||
<div class="chart-title">图7-1 教育质量评估力得分情况</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="chart-box">
|
||
<div id="sub-radar-part7" class="chart"></div>
|
||
<div class="chart-title">图7-2 教育质量评估力各子维度得分情况</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="chart-caption">
|
||
<p>贵校教育质量评估力总体得分为42.0分，低于区均值53.0分，差距达11.0分，整体水平有待提升。各子维度中，学业质量评估得分最高（43.9分），科学评价观得分最低（39.6分），两者相差4.4分，表明贵校在评价理念与方法的科学性方面尤为薄弱，是后续重点改进的方向。</p>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 子维度柱状图 + 水平分布堆叠图 -->
|
||
<div class="chart-row">
|
||
<div class="chart-box">
|
||
<div id="chart-part7" class="chart"></div>
|
||
<div class="chart-title">图7-3 教育质量评估力各子维度对比详情</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="chart-box">
|
||
<div id="level-part7" class="chart"></div>
|
||
<div class="chart-title">图7-4 教育质量评估力各子维度水平分布</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="chart-caption">
|
||
<p>贵校教育质量评估力各子维度整体偏弱，科学评价观处于水平1，学业质量评估、综合素质评估及实践活动评估均处于水平2，且四项子维度均低于区均值，无任何子维度达到区均值及以上水平，表明贵校在教育评估理念与实践操作层面均存在较明显的提升空间。</p>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 聚类散点图（2D或3D） -->
|
||
<div class="chart-box">
|
||
<div id="scatter-part7" class="chart" style="height:450px"></div>
|
||
<div class="chart-title">图7-5 教育质量评估力聚类分析散点图</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="chart-caption">
|
||
<p>聚类分析结果显示，贵校教育质量评估力得分为42.0分，在区内15所学校中排名第15位，被归入"待提升"类型。散点图中贵校的位置表明，其在该维度上的表现与区内其他学校相比存在明显差距，是当前需要重点关注和改进的核心领域。</p>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 维度整体LLM分析 -->
|
||
<div class="llm-analysis">
|
||
<p>教育质量评估力反映学校建立科学评价体系、全面监测教育质量的综合能力，涵盖评价理念、学业监测、素质考查及实践评估等核心要素。贵校在本维度的得分为42.00分，低于杨浦区均值53.03分达11.03分，与同类学校均值44.81分相比亦存在2.81分的差距，整体处于"待提升"聚类层级，区内排名位列第15位（末位），表明贵校在教育质量评估体系的建设与落实方面仍面临较为突出的整体性挑战。</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>从各子维度得分分布来看，贵校四项子维度均集中在39至44分区间，整体差异相对有限，但内部仍存在一定分化。其中，学业质量评估得分最高（43.93分），实践活动评估次之（43.19分），综合素质评估居第三（41.29分），而科学评价观得分最低（39.58分），且为四项中唯一处于水平1的子维度，在区内排名第13位。这一分布特征表明，贵校在具体评估操作层面尚能维持基本水准，但在评价理念的现代化与科学化程度上相对薄弱，评价观的滞后可能制约着各项评估工作的整体质量与深度。</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>与区内其他学校横向比较，贵校在本维度的差距较为明显。区内头部学校如同济一附（61.13分）、控江中学（59.75分）、复旦附中（58.73分）得分均超过58分，与贵校相差逾16分；中间层级的学校如复旦实验（53.63分）、中原中学（51.89分）、杨浦高级（51.51分）亦普遍高出贵校9至12分。即便是与贵校相邻的民星中学（46.66分）和同济中学（45.96分），也分别高出贵校4.66分和3.96分。贵校在学业质量评估和综合素质评估两项的区内排名均为第15位，显示在这两个最具操作性的评估领域，贵校在全区范围内尚未形成有效的评价实践积累。</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>针对贵校当前评估能力的薄弱态势，建议从以下两个方向优先发力：一是着力提升科学评价观的建立与落实，可通过系统性教师培训、引入核心素养导向的评价框架等方式，推动评价理念从经验主导向数据支撑、多元综合的方向转变，为其他子维度的提升奠定理念基础；二是针对学业质量评估与综合素质评估区内排名末位的现状，建议借鉴区内相近类型学校（如民星中学、同济中学）的评估实践，梳理并完善本校评估工具与流程，尽快形成覆盖面更广、操作性更强的质量监测机制，推动各评估环节从制度层面落地生根。</p>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 水平对比表 -->
|
||
<h3>教育质量评估力各子维度水平对比（表7-1）</h3>
|
||
<table class="level-table">
|
||
<thead>
|
||
<tr>
|
||
<th>子维度</th>
|
||
<th>上实剑桥</th>
|
||
<th>得分</th>
|
||
<th>区均值</th>
|
||
<th>排名</th>
|
||
</tr>
|
||
</thead>
|
||
<tbody>
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
<tr>
|
||
<td>科学评价观</td>
|
||
<td class="lv1">水平1</td>
|
||
<td>39.6</td>
|
||
<td>48.9</td>
|
||
<td>13/15</td>
|
||
</tr>
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
<tr>
|
||
<td>学业质量评估</td>
|
||
<td class="lv2">水平2</td>
|
||
<td>43.9</td>
|
||
<td>55.9</td>
|
||
<td>15/15</td>
|
||
</tr>
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
<tr>
|
||
<td>综合素质评估</td>
|
||
<td class="lv2">水平2</td>
|
||
<td>41.3</td>
|
||
<td>53.7</td>
|
||
<td>15/15</td>
|
||
</tr>
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
<tr>
|
||
<td>实践活动评估</td>
|
||
<td class="lv2">水平2</td>
|
||
<td>43.2</td>
|
||
<td>53.6</td>
|
||
<td>13/15</td>
|
||
</tr>
|
||
|
||
|
||
</tbody>
|
||
</table>
|
||
|
||
<hr class="section-divider">
|
||
|
||
<!-- 各三级维度详细分析 -->
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
<h2 id="sub-part7-1">二、科学评价观</h2>
|
||
|
||
<div class="score-cards" style="grid-template-columns: repeat(4, 1fr);">
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">得分</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:24px">39.6</div>
|
||
<div class="diff negative">
|
||
-9.3 vs 区均值
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">区均值</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:24px">48.9</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">水平等级</div>
|
||
<div class="level-indicator level-1">水平1</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">排名</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:24px">13/15</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- C. 温度计条形图 -->
|
||
<div class="chart-box" style="padding:10px 16px;">
|
||
<div id="thermo-part7-1" class="chart" style="height:80px"></div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 金字塔水平指示器（含各水平学校数量） -->
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-container">
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv4 dimmed">
|
||
水平四 · 2所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv3 dimmed">
|
||
水平三 · 7所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv2 dimmed">
|
||
水平二 · 1所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv1 active">
|
||
水平一 · 5所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<span class="pyramid-label"><span class="arrow">◀</span>上实剑桥</span>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<p style="text-indent:0; margin:10px 0; color: var(--gray-500); font-size:14px;">
|
||
<strong>水平1含义：</strong>较少关注学生发展
|
||
</p>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 三级维度LLM分析 -->
|
||
|
||
<div class="llm-analysis">
|
||
<p>贵校在科学评价观维度的得分为<strong>39.58分</strong>，低于杨浦区均值48.93分，差距达<strong>9.35分</strong>，整体处于<strong>水平1</strong>。该水平意味着贵校在课程教学各方面对学生核心素养发展的关注程度相对有限，在素养评价的覆盖广度与深度上均有较大的提升空间。</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>从区内分布来看，杨浦区15所学校中，处于水平3及以上的学校共9所，占比达<strong>60%</strong>；而处于水平1的学校共5所，占比33.3%，贵校位列其中，区内排名第<strong>13位</strong>（共15所）。横向比较来看，贵校得分与同处水平1的民星中学（39.69分）相近，略低于同济中学（41.02分），与区内领先学校同济一附中（59.7分）、交大附中（57.69分）差距明显，整体处于区内偏后位置。</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>针对当前状况，建议贵校从以下路径着力提升：一是系统梳理现有评价体系，在作业设计、课堂观察、过程性评价等环节逐步嵌入核心素养指标，拓宽评价维度；二是结合民办学校的办学灵活性优势，积极探索多元评价方式，如项目式学习评价、学生成长档案袋等，推动评价从"知识达标"向"素养发展"转型；三是加强教师评价素养的专项培训，形成全员参与的评价改进机制，稳步向水平2乃至水平3迈进。</p>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<hr class="section-divider">
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
<h2 id="sub-part7-2">三、学业质量评估</h2>
|
||
|
||
<div class="score-cards" style="grid-template-columns: repeat(4, 1fr);">
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">得分</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:24px">43.9</div>
|
||
<div class="diff negative">
|
||
-11.9 vs 区均值
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">区均值</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:24px">55.9</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">水平等级</div>
|
||
<div class="level-indicator level-2">水平2</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">排名</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:24px">15/15</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- C. 温度计条形图 -->
|
||
<div class="chart-box" style="padding:10px 16px;">
|
||
<div id="thermo-part7-2" class="chart" style="height:80px"></div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 金字塔水平指示器（含各水平学校数量） -->
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-container">
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv4 dimmed">
|
||
水平四 · 10所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv3 dimmed">
|
||
水平三 · 4所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv2 active">
|
||
水平二 · 1所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<span class="pyramid-label"><span class="arrow">◀</span>上实剑桥</span>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv1 dimmed">
|
||
水平一 · 0所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<p style="text-indent:0; margin:10px 0; color: var(--gray-500); font-size:14px;">
|
||
<strong>水平2含义：</strong>至少已研制一项校本化评价工具，学期考试质量分析不做硬性要求
|
||
</p>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 三级维度LLM分析 -->
|
||
|
||
<div class="llm-analysis">
|
||
<p>在学业质量评估维度，贵校得分为43.93分，低于杨浦区均值55.88分，差距达11.95分，位列区内第15名，处于<strong>水平2</strong>。该水平意味着贵校至少已研制一项校本化评价工具，但在评价工具的实际使用推广及学期考试质量分析方面尚未形成系统性要求，整体评估体系仍处于初步建立阶段。</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>从区内水平分布来看，目前杨浦区内达到水平3及以上的学校合计占比高达93.4%（15所学校中有14所），其中水平4学校占66.7%（10所），水平3学校占26.7%（4所）。同济一附中（64.44分）、上理附中（64.21分）等头部学校已在校本化评价工具研制、使用及考试质量属性标注方面形成较为完善的体系；即便是区内得分相对靠后的民星中学（48.86分）也已达到水平3，贵校在该维度的建设整体落后于区内绝大多数学校。</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>鉴于贵校目前仅处于水平2，建议重点从以下路径推进提升：一是在现有校本化评价工具基础上，系统梳理学科评价需求，逐步扩大工具研制覆盖面，推动各学科均形成可操作的评价工具；二是将已研制工具落实到日常教学评价实践中，建立使用规范与反馈机制；三是着力建立学期考试质量分析制度，对试题的知识属性、能力层次进行系统标注，为教学改进提供数据支撑。作为民办高中，贵校在课程与评价设计上拥有较强的灵活性，具备快速推进评估体系建设的内在优势，建议将其转化为可见的制度成果。</p>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<hr class="section-divider">
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
<h2 id="sub-part7-3">四、综合素质评估</h2>
|
||
|
||
<div class="score-cards" style="grid-template-columns: repeat(4, 1fr);">
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">得分</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:24px">41.3</div>
|
||
<div class="diff negative">
|
||
-12.4 vs 区均值
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">区均值</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:24px">53.7</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">水平等级</div>
|
||
<div class="level-indicator level-2">水平2</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">排名</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:24px">15/15</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- C. 温度计条形图 -->
|
||
<div class="chart-box" style="padding:10px 16px;">
|
||
<div id="thermo-part7-3" class="chart" style="height:80px"></div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 金字塔水平指示器（含各水平学校数量） -->
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-container">
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv4 dimmed">
|
||
水平四 · 6所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv3 dimmed">
|
||
水平三 · 5所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv2 active">
|
||
水平二 · 4所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<span class="pyramid-label"><span class="arrow">◀</span>上实剑桥</span>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv1 dimmed">
|
||
水平一 · 0所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<p style="text-indent:0; margin:10px 0; color: var(--gray-500); font-size:14px;">
|
||
<strong>水平2含义：</strong>校本化综合素质评价方案建成，但具体评价工具有待开发
|
||
</p>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 三级维度LLM分析 -->
|
||
|
||
<div class="llm-analysis">
|
||
<p>在综合素质评估维度，贵校得分为41.29分，低于杨浦区均值53.66分，差距达12.37分，处于<strong>水平2</strong>。该水平意味着贵校已完成校本化综合素质评价方案的基础建设，但具体评价工具尚待系统开发，评价体系的落地实施与结果运用仍有较大提升空间。</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>从区内整体分布来看，杨浦区15所学校中，达到水平3及以上的学校共11所，占比73.3%，其中水平4学校6所（占40.0%）；与贵校同处水平2的学校共4所（含上理附中），占比26.7%，区内暂无学校处于水平1。具体而言，交大附中、复旦附中、控江中学等6所学校以59.85分位居首位，上理少云、同济中学等5所学校以53.66分处于中等水平，贵校与上理附中并列区内第14、15位，在全区处于较为靠后的位置，与头部学校差距显著。</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>鉴于贵校目前处于水平2，建议重点聚焦评价工具的开发与完善。一是在现有方案框架下，分维度研制可操作的量化与质性评价工具，形成完整的评价工具包；二是积极引入或自主建设综合素质评价数字化平台，实现学生成长记录的过程性留存与可视化呈现；三是推动评价结果的有效运用，将综合素质评价与学生发展指导、课程选择及家校沟通紧密结合。作为民办高中，贵校在机制创新和资源整合方面具备较强灵活性，可借助这一优势加快补齐短板，力争在中短期内实现水平跃升。</p>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<hr class="section-divider">
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
<h2 id="sub-part7-4">五、实践活动评估</h2>
|
||
|
||
<div class="score-cards" style="grid-template-columns: repeat(4, 1fr);">
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">得分</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:24px">43.2</div>
|
||
<div class="diff negative">
|
||
-10.4 vs 区均值
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">区均值</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:24px">53.6</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">水平等级</div>
|
||
<div class="level-indicator level-2">水平2</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">排名</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:24px">13/15</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- C. 温度计条形图 -->
|
||
<div class="chart-box" style="padding:10px 16px;">
|
||
<div id="thermo-part7-4" class="chart" style="height:80px"></div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 金字塔水平指示器（含各水平学校数量） -->
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-container">
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv4 dimmed">
|
||
水平四 · 11所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv3 dimmed">
|
||
水平三 · 1所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv2 active">
|
||
水平二 · 1所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<span class="pyramid-label"><span class="arrow">◀</span>上实剑桥</span>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv1 dimmed">
|
||
水平一 · 2所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<p style="text-indent:0; margin:10px 0; color: var(--gray-500); font-size:14px;">
|
||
<strong>水平2含义：</strong>学科实践活动的校本化评价工具已研制
|
||
</p>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 三级维度LLM分析 -->
|
||
|
||
<div class="llm-analysis">
|
||
<p>在实践活动评估维度，贵校得分为43.19分，低于杨浦区均值53.65分，差距达10.45分，位列区内第13名（共15所），处于<strong>水平2</strong>。水平2意味着贵校目前仅完成了学科实践活动校本化评价工具的研制工作，而研究性学习与社会考察两类活动的评价工具尚未进入研制或使用阶段，实践评估体系的覆盖面有待显著拓展。</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>从区内整体水平分布来看，已达水平4（研究性学习、社会考察及学科实践活动的评价工具均已研制并投入使用）的学校多达11所，占全区的73.3%；水平3及以上学校合计占比达80%。体院附中（65.51分）、上理附中与复旦附中（均63.03分）等校均已处于水平4，贵校与区内多数同类学校之间存在明显差距，在三类实践活动评估工具的系统化建设上尚有较大提升空间。</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>鉴于贵校当前处于水平2，建议重点推进以下提升路径：<strong>第一步</strong>，在已有学科实践活动评价工具的基础上，尽快启动研究性学习评价工具的研制，明确评估维度、标准与操作规范，并在课程中实际试用；<strong>第二步</strong>，同步推进社会考察评价工具的研制，结合民办高中灵活办学的优势，设计具有校本特色的考察任务与评价量规；<strong>第三步</strong>，待三类工具均进入使用阶段后，建立常态化反馈与迭代机制，逐步向水平4靠拢，形成完整的实践活动评估闭环。</p>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="section" id="part8">
|
||
<h1>第八部分 教育条件保障力表现</h1>
|
||
|
||
<h2>一、整体表现</h2>
|
||
|
||
<div class="score-cards">
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">教育条件保障力得分</div>
|
||
<div class="value">47.7</div>
|
||
<div class="diff negative">
|
||
-4.3 vs 区均值
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">同类学校均值</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:24px">45.7</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">区内排名</div>
|
||
<div class="value">11/15</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">维度类型</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:14px">
|
||
<span class="type-badge weak">
|
||
待提升
|
||
</span>
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<!-- 维度独立得分柱状图 + 子维度雷达/柱状图 -->
|
||
<div class="chart-row">
|
||
<div class="chart-box">
|
||
<div id="dim-score-part8" class="chart"></div>
|
||
<div class="chart-title">图8-1 教育条件保障力得分情况</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="chart-box">
|
||
<div id="sub-radar-part8" class="chart"></div>
|
||
<div class="chart-title">图8-2 教育条件保障力各子维度得分情况</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="chart-caption">
|
||
<p>贵校教育条件保障力总体得分为47.7分，低于区均值52.0分，差距达4.3分。从各子维度来看，区域推进（60.5分）、环境支持（45.1分）、资源支持（37.5分）呈现明显的梯度差异，最高与最低子维度分差达23.1分，表明贵校在资源支持方面存在较为突出的短板，是影响整体教育条件保障力的关键制约因素。</p>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 子维度柱状图 + 水平分布堆叠图 -->
|
||
<div class="chart-row">
|
||
<div class="chart-box">
|
||
<div id="chart-part8" class="chart"></div>
|
||
<div class="chart-title">图8-3 教育条件保障力各子维度对比详情</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="chart-box">
|
||
<div id="level-part8" class="chart"></div>
|
||
<div class="chart-title">图8-4 教育条件保障力各子维度水平分布</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="chart-caption">
|
||
<p>贵校教育条件保障力各子维度发展不均衡，区域推进达到水平4，高于区均值，表现突出；而环境支持（水平2）与资源支持（水平1）均低于区均值，尤其资源支持处于较低水平，是当前该维度的主要短板，亟需重点关注与改善。</p>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 聚类散点图（2D或3D） -->
|
||
<div class="chart-box">
|
||
<div id="scatter-part8" class="chart" style="height:450px"></div>
|
||
<div class="chart-title">图8-5 教育条件保障力聚类分析散点图</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="chart-caption">
|
||
<p>散点图呈现了区内各校教育条件保障力的分布格局，贵校在该维度得分为47.7分，区内排名第11位（共15所学校），聚类结果归属"待提升"类型，整体处于区内中下游水平，与领先学校相比在教育条件保障方面仍存在较明显差距，有待进一步加强。</p>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 维度整体LLM分析 -->
|
||
<div class="llm-analysis">
|
||
<p>教育条件保障力衡量学校在区域政策支持、硬件环境及资源配置等方面为课程实施提供保障的综合能力，涵盖区域推进、环境支持和资源支持三个子维度。贵校在该维度的得分为<strong>47.70分</strong>，低于杨浦区均值51.99分（差距-4.29分），但高于同类学校均值45.71分，区内排名第11位（共15所学校），整体处于<strong>待提升</strong>聚类层次。</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>从三个子维度的得分分布来看，贵校内部差异较为显著。区域推进得分最高，为<strong>60.54分</strong>（水平4，区内排名第5），反映出贵校在承接和落实区域政策层面具有一定优势；环境支持得分为<strong>45.09分</strong>（水平2，区内排名第14），明显低于区域推进水平；资源支持得分最低，仅为<strong>37.47分</strong>（水平1，区内排名第15），在全区处于末位，是制约整体教育条件保障力的最薄弱环节。三个子维度呈现出"政策承接较好、硬件环境偏弱、资源配置严重不足"的结构性失衡特征。</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>与区内其他学校横向比较，贵校整体得分处于中下游水平。得分较高的学校中，同济一附（62.11分）、控江中学（59.51分）、上财附中（59.41分）均明显领先；杨浦高级（58.81分）、交大附中（56.04分）也高出贵校逾8分。贵校与市东中学（47.47分）、同济中学（47.47分）得分相近，仅略高于中原中学（42.67分）和上理少云（39.96分）。值得关注的是，尽管贵校在资源支持子维度位列区内末位，但在区域推进子维度的表现（第5名）相对突出，说明贵校在政策层面的响应能力具备一定基础，条件保障的短板主要集中在实体资源与环境建设层面。</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>针对贵校当前最薄弱的两个子维度，建议重点从以下方面着力改进：其一，在<strong>资源支持</strong>方面，结合民办学校办学灵活的体制优势，积极拓展多元筹资渠道，优先补充教学所需的数字化工具、专业教室及课程资料等基础性资源配置，推动该子维度从水平1向更高层级提升；其二，在<strong>环境支持</strong>方面，可结合学校城区办学特点，系统梳理现有物理学习空间的功能布局，有计划地推进教学环境的改善与升级，以硬件条件的提质带动整体教育条件保障力的均衡发展。</p>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 水平对比表 -->
|
||
<h3>教育条件保障力各子维度水平对比（表8-1）</h3>
|
||
<table class="level-table">
|
||
<thead>
|
||
<tr>
|
||
<th>子维度</th>
|
||
<th>上实剑桥</th>
|
||
<th>得分</th>
|
||
<th>区均值</th>
|
||
<th>排名</th>
|
||
</tr>
|
||
</thead>
|
||
<tbody>
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
<tr>
|
||
<td>区域推进</td>
|
||
<td class="lv4">水平4</td>
|
||
<td>60.5</td>
|
||
<td>51.3</td>
|
||
<td>5/15</td>
|
||
</tr>
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
<tr>
|
||
<td>环境支持</td>
|
||
<td class="lv2">水平2</td>
|
||
<td>45.1</td>
|
||
<td>51.5</td>
|
||
<td>14/15</td>
|
||
</tr>
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
<tr>
|
||
<td>资源支持</td>
|
||
<td class="lv1">水平1</td>
|
||
<td>37.5</td>
|
||
<td>53.2</td>
|
||
<td>15/15</td>
|
||
</tr>
|
||
|
||
|
||
</tbody>
|
||
</table>
|
||
|
||
<hr class="section-divider">
|
||
|
||
<!-- 各三级维度详细分析 -->
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
<h2 id="sub-part8-1">二、区域推进</h2>
|
||
|
||
<div class="score-cards" style="grid-template-columns: repeat(4, 1fr);">
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">得分</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:24px">60.5</div>
|
||
<div class="diff positive">
|
||
+9.3 vs 区均值
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">区均值</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:24px">51.3</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">水平等级</div>
|
||
<div class="level-indicator level-4">水平4</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">排名</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:24px">5/15</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- C. 温度计条形图 -->
|
||
<div class="chart-box" style="padding:10px 16px;">
|
||
<div id="thermo-part8-1" class="chart" style="height:80px"></div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 金字塔水平指示器（含各水平学校数量） -->
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-container">
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv4 active">
|
||
水平四 · 5所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<span class="pyramid-label"><span class="arrow">◀</span>上实剑桥</span>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv3 dimmed">
|
||
水平三 · 1所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv2 dimmed">
|
||
水平二 · 7所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv1 dimmed">
|
||
水平一 · 2所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<p style="text-indent:0; margin:10px 0; color: var(--gray-500); font-size:14px;">
|
||
<strong>水平4含义：</strong>召开会议平均一个月2次及以上，区域管理文件数量和措施均为最大值
|
||
</p>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 三级维度LLM分析 -->
|
||
|
||
<div class="llm-analysis">
|
||
<p>在区域推进维度，贵校得分为60.54分，高于杨浦区均值51.26分9.28个百分点，达到<strong>水平4</strong>。水平4意味着区教育局召开课程教学相关会议的频率达到平均每月2次及以上，且区域管理文件数量与配套措施均处于最大值水平，体现出所在区对高中课程教学工作的高频度、强力度推进态势。</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>从区内整体分布来看，杨浦区15所学校中，处于水平4的学校共5所，占比33.3%；处于水平1和水平2的学校合计9所，占比达60%，说明区内大多数学校所获得的区域推进支持仍处于中低水平。贵校与上财附中、体院附中、同济一附、控江中学并列区内第一梯队，均以60.54分位列前5名，显著优于同济中学、复旦实验等处于水平2的学校（51.26分），更远超中原中学（37.33分）和上理少云（32.69分）等水平1学校，区域推进的外部支撑条件相对充裕。</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>贵校已处于区域推进的最优水平，区教育局的高频会议机制和完善的政策文件体系为课程教学提供了有力的外部保障，这一优势值得充分肯定。建议贵校在此基础上进一步深化转化成效：将区级会议精神和管理文件的要求有效内化为校本实施方案，结合民办学校的办学灵活性，将区域推进的政策资源转化为具体的课程创新举措与教学质量提升行动，实现从"被推进"到"主动作为"的跃升。</p>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<hr class="section-divider">
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
<h2 id="sub-part8-2">三、环境支持</h2>
|
||
|
||
<div class="score-cards" style="grid-template-columns: repeat(4, 1fr);">
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">得分</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:24px">45.1</div>
|
||
<div class="diff negative">
|
||
-6.4 vs 区均值
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">区均值</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:24px">51.5</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">水平等级</div>
|
||
<div class="level-indicator level-2">水平2</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">排名</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:24px">14/15</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- C. 温度计条形图 -->
|
||
<div class="chart-box" style="padding:10px 16px;">
|
||
<div id="thermo-part8-2" class="chart" style="height:80px"></div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 金字塔水平指示器（含各水平学校数量） -->
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-container">
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv4 dimmed">
|
||
水平四 · 5所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv3 dimmed">
|
||
水平三 · 1所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv2 active">
|
||
水平二 · 9所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<span class="pyramid-label"><span class="arrow">◀</span>上实剑桥</span>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv1 dimmed">
|
||
水平一 · 0所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<p style="text-indent:0; margin:10px 0; color: var(--gray-500); font-size:14px;">
|
||
<strong>水平2含义：</strong>信息化支持和硬件支持至少有一项建设较好
|
||
</p>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 三级维度LLM分析 -->
|
||
|
||
<div class="llm-analysis">
|
||
<p>贵校在环境支持维度的得分为45.09分，低于杨浦区均值51.47分，差距为6.38分，在区内15所学校中排名第14位，处于<strong>水平2</strong>。该水平的含义为：信息化支持和硬件支持至少有一项建设较好，但两者尚未实现同步均衡发展，整体环境支撑能力仍有较大提升空间。</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>从区内水平分布来看，目前达到水平3及以上的学校共6所，占全区的40.0%，其中水平4学校5所（上理附中、上财附中、交大附中、同济一附、杨浦高级），水平3学校1所（控江中学），这些学校在信息化环境与硬件设施建设方面均已形成较为完善的支撑体系。贵校与同处水平2的复旦附中、复旦实验、同济中学等7所学校得分相同（均为45.09分），说明在该梯队中并无明显分化，但与领先梯队相比仍存在约17分的显著差距。</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>针对贵校目前处于水平2的现状，建议从以下路径推进环境支持的系统性提升：一是<strong>补齐短板</strong>，优先诊断信息化支持与硬件支持中相对薄弱的一项，制定专项投入计划，实现两项指标的均衡达标；二是<strong>发挥民办优势</strong>，借助灵活的办学机制，加快推进智慧教室、多媒体设备等硬件更新迭代，提升课堂信息化应用环境；三是<strong>强化使用效能</strong>，在改善硬件条件的同时，注重教师信息化应用能力培训，确保设施投入转化为真实的教学支撑效果，逐步向水平3乃至水平4迈进。</p>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<hr class="section-divider">
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
<h2 id="sub-part8-3">四、资源支持</h2>
|
||
|
||
<div class="score-cards" style="grid-template-columns: repeat(4, 1fr);">
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">得分</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:24px">37.5</div>
|
||
<div class="diff negative">
|
||
-15.8 vs 区均值
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">区均值</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:24px">53.2</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">水平等级</div>
|
||
<div class="level-indicator level-1">水平1</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">排名</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:24px">15/15</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- C. 温度计条形图 -->
|
||
<div class="chart-box" style="padding:10px 16px;">
|
||
<div id="thermo-part8-3" class="chart" style="height:80px"></div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 金字塔水平指示器（含各水平学校数量） -->
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-container">
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv4 dimmed">
|
||
水平四 · 5所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv3 dimmed">
|
||
水平三 · 4所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv2 dimmed">
|
||
水平二 · 5所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv1 active">
|
||
水平一 · 1所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<span class="pyramid-label"><span class="arrow">◀</span>上实剑桥</span>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<p style="text-indent:0; margin:10px 0; color: var(--gray-500); font-size:14px;">
|
||
<strong>水平1含义：</strong>校内外资源和师资水平三项均建设较差
|
||
</p>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 三级维度LLM分析 -->
|
||
|
||
<div class="llm-analysis">
|
||
<p>贵校资源支持维度得分为37.47分，低于杨浦区均值53.24分，差距达15.76分，在区内15所学校中位列末位（第15名），处于<strong>水平1</strong>。水平1意味着贵校在校内资源配置、校外资源引入及师资水平三个方面均建设较差，整体资源支撑能力在区内处于明显薄弱位置。</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>从区内水平分布来看，处于水平2及以上的学校共14所，占比高达93.3%，而贵校是全区唯一处于水平1的学校。具体而言，控江中学（64.01分）、交大附中（63.29分）、同济一附（62.93分）等水平4学校在资源建设上遥遥领先；即便是同处相对薄弱区间的上理少云（42.10分）、中原中学（45.60分），其得分仍明显高于贵校。这表明贵校在资源支持方面的差距并非局部性偏弱，而是系统性不足，亟需整体提升。</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>针对贵校当前状况，建议从以下路径推进改善：一是盘活民办学校办学灵活性优势，积极拓展校外合作资源，如引入高校、企业及社会机构开展协同育人，补充校内资源短板；二是优化师资结构，通过有竞争力的薪酬机制和专业发展平台吸引及留住优质教师，并加强在职教师的培训与成长激励；三是有计划地推进校内硬件与课程资源建设，逐步向水平2标准靠拢，以校内外资源至少一项达到接近区均水平为近期目标，为贵校整体办学质量的提升夯实基础。</p>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="section" id="part9">
|
||
<h1>第九部分 数字化赋能力表现</h1>
|
||
|
||
<h2>一、整体表现</h2>
|
||
|
||
<div class="score-cards">
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">数字化赋能力得分</div>
|
||
<div class="value">42.5</div>
|
||
<div class="diff negative">
|
||
-9.2 vs 区均值
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">同类学校均值</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:24px">46.1</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">区内排名</div>
|
||
<div class="value">14/15</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">维度类型</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:14px">
|
||
<span class="type-badge weak">
|
||
待提升
|
||
</span>
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<!-- 维度独立得分柱状图 + 子维度雷达/柱状图 -->
|
||
<div class="chart-row">
|
||
<div class="chart-box">
|
||
<div id="dim-score-part9" class="chart"></div>
|
||
<div class="chart-title">图9-1 数字化赋能力得分情况</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="chart-box">
|
||
<div id="sub-radar-part9" class="chart"></div>
|
||
<div class="chart-title">图9-2 数字化赋能力各子维度得分情况</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="chart-caption">
|
||
<p>贵校数字化赋能力总体得分为42.5分，低于区均值51.7分，差距达9.2分，整体水平有待提升。三个子维度中，教学方式创新得分相对较高（47.6分），评价精准化与个性化次之（41.1分），课程迭代优化得分最低（38.9分），三者间最大分差为8.7分，表明贵校在数字化赋能的不同应用场景中发展尚不均衡，课程迭代优化能力亟需重点关注与加强。</p>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 子维度柱状图 + 水平分布堆叠图 -->
|
||
<div class="chart-row">
|
||
<div class="chart-box">
|
||
<div id="chart-part9" class="chart"></div>
|
||
<div class="chart-title">图9-3 数字化赋能力各子维度对比详情</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="chart-box">
|
||
<div id="level-part9" class="chart"></div>
|
||
<div class="chart-title">图9-4 数字化赋能力各子维度水平分布</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="chart-caption">
|
||
<p>贵校数字化赋能力三个子维度均低于区均值，整体表现有待提升。其中教学方式创新达到水平3，相对较好；评价精准化与个性化处于水平2；课程迭代优化仅为水平1，是三项中最为薄弱的环节，亟需重点关注与改进。</p>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 聚类散点图（2D或3D） -->
|
||
<div class="chart-box">
|
||
<div id="scatter-part9" class="chart" style="height:450px"></div>
|
||
<div class="chart-title">图9-5 数字化赋能力聚类分析散点图</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="chart-caption">
|
||
<p>散点图呈现了区内各校数字化赋能力的聚类分布情况。贵校在该维度得分为42.5分，区内排名第14/15，聚类类型被归为"待提升"，在区内整体处于较低水平，与多数学校相比仍存在明显差距，该领域有待重点关注与加强。</p>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 维度整体LLM分析 -->
|
||
<div class="llm-analysis">
|
||
<p>数字化赋能力反映学校运用数字技术推动教学创新、评价精准化与课程持续优化的整体能力，是衡量学校数字化转型深度与广度的重要维度。贵校在该维度的得分为42.53分，低于杨浦区均值51.69分（差距达9.16分），亦低于同类学校均值46.06分，整体处于"待提升"聚类，在区内15所学校中位列第14名，与区内平均水平存在较为明显的差距。</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>从三个子维度的得分分布来看，贵校各项得分均处于偏低区间，且彼此之间呈现出一定的梯度差异。其中，教学方式创新得分相对最高，为47.62分（水平3，区内排名第13），是贵校在本维度中表现最佳的领域；评价精准化与个性化得分为41.06分（水平2，区内排名第12），居中；课程迭代优化得分最低，仅38.90分（水平1，区内排名第15），不仅是三个子维度中的薄弱项，亦在全区垫底。整体来看，贵校数字化赋能力的短板较为集中，尤以课程数字化迭代能力的建设最为紧迫。</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>横向比较来看，区内头部学校与贵校之间存在较大差距。上理附中（61.35分）、复旦附中（60.92分）、同济一附与控江中学（均为57.31分）等校均处于较高水平，上财附中（55.42分）、民星中学（54.07分）亦显著高于区均值。即便与中段学校相比，贵校的差距也不容忽视：交大附中（48.30分）、复旦实验（47.95分）、体院附中（47.76分）等校的得分均高出贵校5分以上。区内仅同济中学（40.05分）得分低于贵校，说明贵校在数字化赋能力方面的整体竞争力亟待加强。</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>针对贵校当前的薄弱环节，建议重点从以下两个方向着手推进。其一，将课程迭代优化列为近期数字化建设的优先突破口，可借助学情数据平台逐步建立课程内容的动态调整机制，推动教研团队形成"数据反馈—课程修订"的常态化工作流程，以弥补当前在全区垫底的短板。其二，在评价精准化方面，建议引入或强化学生学习过程数据的采集与分析工具，逐步实现从结果性评价向过程性、个性化评价的转变，为教学决策提供更有力的数据支撑。作为民办高中，贵校在机制灵活性方面具备一定优势，可将上述举措纳入学校发展规划，分阶段落地推进。</p>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 水平对比表 -->
|
||
<h3>数字化赋能力各子维度水平对比（表9-1）</h3>
|
||
<table class="level-table">
|
||
<thead>
|
||
<tr>
|
||
<th>子维度</th>
|
||
<th>上实剑桥</th>
|
||
<th>得分</th>
|
||
<th>区均值</th>
|
||
<th>排名</th>
|
||
</tr>
|
||
</thead>
|
||
<tbody>
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
<tr>
|
||
<td>教学方式创新</td>
|
||
<td class="lv3">水平3</td>
|
||
<td>47.6</td>
|
||
<td>52.6</td>
|
||
<td>13/15</td>
|
||
</tr>
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
<tr>
|
||
<td>评价精准化与个性化</td>
|
||
<td class="lv2">水平2</td>
|
||
<td>41.1</td>
|
||
<td>48.6</td>
|
||
<td>12/15</td>
|
||
</tr>
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
<tr>
|
||
<td>课程迭代优化</td>
|
||
<td class="lv1">水平1</td>
|
||
<td>38.9</td>
|
||
<td>53.8</td>
|
||
<td>15/15</td>
|
||
</tr>
|
||
|
||
|
||
</tbody>
|
||
</table>
|
||
|
||
<hr class="section-divider">
|
||
|
||
<!-- 各三级维度详细分析 -->
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
<h2 id="sub-part9-1">二、教学方式创新</h2>
|
||
|
||
<div class="score-cards" style="grid-template-columns: repeat(4, 1fr);">
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">得分</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:24px">47.6</div>
|
||
<div class="diff negative">
|
||
-5.0 vs 区均值
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">区均值</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:24px">52.6</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">水平等级</div>
|
||
<div class="level-indicator level-3">水平3</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">排名</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:24px">13/15</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- C. 温度计条形图 -->
|
||
<div class="chart-box" style="padding:10px 16px;">
|
||
<div id="thermo-part9-1" class="chart" style="height:80px"></div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 金字塔水平指示器（含各水平学校数量） -->
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-container">
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv4 dimmed">
|
||
水平四 · 7所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv3 active">
|
||
水平三 · 6所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<span class="pyramid-label"><span class="arrow">◀</span>上实剑桥</span>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv2 dimmed">
|
||
水平二 · 1所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv1 dimmed">
|
||
水平一 · 1所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<p style="text-indent:0; margin:10px 0; color: var(--gray-500); font-size:14px;">
|
||
<strong>水平3含义：</strong>信息技术与教学融合程度较高，教师能使用信息技术
|
||
</p>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 三级维度LLM分析 -->
|
||
|
||
<div class="llm-analysis">
|
||
<p>在教学方式创新维度，贵校得分为47.62分，低于杨浦区均值52.59分，差距为4.97分，处于<strong>水平3</strong>。该水平意味着贵校信息技术与教学融合程度较高，教师已具备使用信息技术开展教学的能力，但尚未实现常态化、系统化应用，在融合深度与教师日常教学习惯的稳定性方面仍有提升空间。</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>从区内整体分布来看，杨浦区共有7所学校（占比46.7%）达到水平4，6所学校（占比40.0%）处于水平3，贵校与体院附中（48.29分）、复旦实验（48.87分）同处水平3区间，位列区内第13名，位次偏后。复旦附中（62.84分）、上理附中（60.15分）等头部学校已在信息技术常态化融合方面形成显著优势，与贵校差距达15分左右，差距较为明显。</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>作为民办高中，贵校在课程安排与教学模式上具有较强的灵活性，建议充分发挥这一体制优势，着力推动信息技术融合从"能用"向"常用、善用"跨越。具体而言，可从以下路径着手：一是建立教师信息化教学常态考核机制，将技术应用频次与质量纳入教研评价；二是遴选信息化教学标杆教师，通过"同课异构""公开课展示"等形式带动全员提升；三是结合贵校学生特点，引入适配的数字化学习平台，推动课前预习、课中互动与课后反馈的一体化应用，逐步向水平4迈进。</p>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<hr class="section-divider">
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
<h2 id="sub-part9-2">三、评价精准化与个性化</h2>
|
||
|
||
<div class="score-cards" style="grid-template-columns: repeat(4, 1fr);">
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">得分</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:24px">41.1</div>
|
||
<div class="diff negative">
|
||
-7.6 vs 区均值
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">区均值</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:24px">48.6</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">水平等级</div>
|
||
<div class="level-indicator level-2">水平2</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">排名</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:24px">12/15</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- C. 温度计条形图 -->
|
||
<div class="chart-box" style="padding:10px 16px;">
|
||
<div id="thermo-part9-2" class="chart" style="height:80px"></div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 金字塔水平指示器（含各水平学校数量） -->
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-container">
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv4 dimmed">
|
||
水平四 · 2所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv3 dimmed">
|
||
水平三 · 5所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv2 active">
|
||
水平二 · 5所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<span class="pyramid-label"><span class="arrow">◀</span>上实剑桥</span>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv1 dimmed">
|
||
水平一 · 3所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<p style="text-indent:0; margin:10px 0; color: var(--gray-500); font-size:14px;">
|
||
<strong>水平2含义：</strong>有信息技术平台支持学业评价
|
||
</p>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 三级维度LLM分析 -->
|
||
|
||
<div class="llm-analysis">
|
||
<p>在评价精准化与个性化维度，贵校得分为41.06分，低于杨浦区均值48.64分，差距达7.58分，处于<strong>水平2</strong>。该水平意味着贵校已具备信息技术平台以支持学业评价，能够借助数字化工具开展基本的学习成效记录与反馈，但在学科精准诊断与综合素质多元评价方面尚未形成系统性的技术支撑。</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>从区内水平分布来看，目前处于水平3及以上的学校共10所，占杨浦区高中总数的66.6%，即全区已有超过三分之二的学校能够借助第三方或自建平台实现学科诊断与综合素质评价的深度整合。贵校以41.06分位列区内第12名，得分高于同济中学（39.74分）、体院附中（35.96分）和复旦实验（35.96分），但与排名靠前的上理附中（64.85分）、复旦附中（60.89分）以及中等梯队的上理少云、控江中学等（52.95分）相比，仍有较为明显的差距。</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>建议贵校结合民办高中办学灵活的制度优势，有序推进评价数字化的能力跃升。近期可积极引入成熟的第三方学科诊断平台（如学情分析类工具），打通考试数据与课堂评价数据，实现由单一学业评价向学科精准诊断的升级，争取达到水平3；中长期可在此基础上探索建立涵盖综合素质的校本评价数字化体系，逐步形成贵校特色的学生成长档案，推动评价从"记录"走向"赋能"。</p>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<hr class="section-divider">
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
<h2 id="sub-part9-3">四、课程迭代优化</h2>
|
||
|
||
<div class="score-cards" style="grid-template-columns: repeat(4, 1fr);">
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">得分</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:24px">38.9</div>
|
||
<div class="diff negative">
|
||
-14.9 vs 区均值
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">区均值</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:24px">53.8</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">水平等级</div>
|
||
<div class="level-indicator level-1">水平1</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="score-card">
|
||
<div class="label">排名</div>
|
||
<div class="value" style="font-size:24px">15/15</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- C. 温度计条形图 -->
|
||
<div class="chart-box" style="padding:10px 16px;">
|
||
<div id="thermo-part9-3" class="chart" style="height:80px"></div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 金字塔水平指示器（含各水平学校数量） -->
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-container">
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv4 dimmed">
|
||
水平四 · 11所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv3 dimmed">
|
||
水平三 · 0所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv2 dimmed">
|
||
水平二 · 0所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="pyramid-row">
|
||
<div class="pyramid-block lv1 active">
|
||
水平一 · 4所
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<span class="pyramid-label"><span class="arrow">◀</span>上实剑桥</span>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<p style="text-indent:0; margin:10px 0; color: var(--gray-500); font-size:14px;">
|
||
<strong>水平1含义：</strong>学校几乎不开展数字化转型活动，尚未建成信息化管理系统
|
||
</p>
|
||
|
||
<!-- 三级维度LLM分析 -->
|
||
|
||
<div class="llm-analysis">
|
||
<p>在课程迭代优化维度，贵校得分为38.90分，低于杨浦区均值53.83分，差距达14.93分，位居区内第15名，处于水平1。水平1意味着学校几乎不开展数字化转型活动，尚未建成信息化管理系统，在教学业务的信息化支撑与数字化转型规划方面均处于起步阶段。</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>从区内水平分布来看，杨浦区共15所学校中，有11所（占73.3%）已达到水平4，另有4所（占26.7%）处于水平1，贵校即属于后者。与区内领先学校相比，上理少云、复旦附中、控江中学等11所学校均以59.03分位居水平4，已实现绝大部分业务信息化并制定专项数字化研修计划；市东中学以41.42分略高于贵校，亦同属较低水平梯队。整体而言，贵校与区内主流水平之间存在明显差距，提升空间较为突出。</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>结合贵校民办高中的办学特性，建议从以下路径推进提升：一是优先建立基础信息化管理系统，逐步将教学排课、作业管理、成绩分析等核心业务纳入系统支撑，实现业务流程的基本数字化；二是制定学校层面的数字化转型专项规划，明确阶段目标与责任分工，推动从"零散使用"向"系统推进"转变；三是依托民办学校机制灵活的优势，积极引入或开发适配自身课程特色的数字化工具，形成差异化的迭代优化路径，逐步向水平3乃至水平4迈进。</p>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="section" id="conclusion">
|
||
<h1>第十部分 总结与改进建议</h1>
|
||
|
||
<!-- D. 进步空间瀑布图 -->
|
||
|
||
<div class="chart-box">
|
||
<div id="waterfall-chart" class="chart" style="height:400px"></div>
|
||
<div class="chart-title">图10-1 进步空间分析：提升至水平3的潜在收益</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="chart-caption">
|
||
<p>贵校当前共有14个三级维度低于水平3，其中7个处于水平1（含课程结构建设得分44.0、作业设计与管理变革得分33.5、培训支持得分46.4等），另有7个处于水平2（含环境支持得分45.1、学业质量评估得分43.9等）；若将上述维度整体提升至水平3，预计将对贵校整体课程实施水平带来显著改善，其中作业设计与管理变革（33.5）、学科发展的个性化辅导（34.8）等得分较低的维度提升潜力最为突出。</p>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
<div class="llm-analysis">
|
||
<p>贵校在本次课程实施评估中总体得分为44.99分，区内排名第15位，属于课程实施待提升类学校。从各维度表现来看，贵校在课程领导力、学生发展指导力及教育条件保障力三个方面相对突出，尤其在学生生涯发展指导（61.16分）和区域推进（60.54分）两个三级维度上达到水平4，体现出贵校在关注学生个体发展与外部协作方面已形成一定特色与积累。然而，教学变革力与教育质量评估力两大维度明显低于区均值，多个三级维度仍处于水平1至2，是制约贵校整体课程实施水平提升的主要短板。</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>在教学变革与支持体系方面，贵校的作业设计与管理变革（33.52分）、学科发展的个性化辅导（34.82分）均处于水平1，亟需系统性推进。建议贵校组建跨学科作业统筹小组，制定校级作业总量与质量双控标准，逐步从"布置作业"转向"设计作业"，目标提升至水平3；在个性化辅导方面，可依托现有学生生涯指导经验，建立学生学科能力诊断档案，面向不同层次学生实施分层辅导方案。培训支持（46.35分）、教研支持（39.09分）与项目支持（42.40分）同处水平1，建议贵校将教师专业发展纳入年度工作计划，定期开展校本教研活动，引入或自主申报教学改进专项项目，以制度化机制推动上述维度向水平2至3跃升。课程结构建设（43.96分）与课程迭代优化（38.90分）均为水平1，建议参照课程方案定期开展课程审议，建立课程实施反馈与修订机制，形成"实施—评估—优化"的闭环管理流程。</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>在教育质量评估方面，贵校科学评价观（39.58分）、资源支持（37.47分）处于水平1，学业质量评估、综合素质评估、实践活动评估及评价精准化与个性化均处于水平2，整体评估体系有待重构。建议贵校首先加强管理层及教师对多元评价理念的系统学习，将过程性评价纳入日常教学考核；其次依托现有教育条件保障力的相对优势，补充评价工具与数据管理资源，逐步搭建覆盖学业、综合素质与实践活动的多维评估体系；同时引入评价精准化工具，提升对不同学生群体的个性化反馈能力，推动各评估维度向水平3迈进。</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>作为民办高中，贵校具备机制灵活、决策高效的天然优势。建议贵校充分利用这一特点，在补齐评估短板与教学变革的同时，进一步深化学生生涯发展指导等已有特色，探索形成与学校定位相匹配的课程实施路径。随着各薄弱维度的系统改善，贵校有望在区域内实现整体办学水平的跨越式提升。</p>
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
<script>
|
||
const COLORS = {
|
||
primary: '#2563eb',
|
||
primaryLight: '#93bbfd',
|
||
success: '#059669',
|
||
warning: '#d97706',
|
||
danger: '#dc2626',
|
||
gray: '#d1d5db',
|
||
grayDark: '#6b7280',
|
||
cluster_good: '#2563eb',
|
||
cluster_weak: '#f59e0b',
|
||
level1: '#ef4444',
|
||
level2: '#f59e0b',
|
||
level3: '#3b82f6',
|
||
level4: '#10b981',
|
||
};
|
||
</script>
|
||
|
||
<script>
|
||
// ===== 1. 得分对比横向条形图 =====
|
||
const scoreCompare = {"categories": ["\u8bfe\u7a0b\u9886\u5bfc\u529b", "\u6559\u5b66\u53d8\u9769\u529b", "\u5b66\u751f\u53d1\u5c55\u6307\u5bfc\u529b", "\u6559\u5e08\u53d1\u5c55\u652f\u6301\u529b", "\u6559\u80b2\u8d28\u91cf\u8bc4\u4f30\u529b", "\u6559\u80b2\u6761\u4ef6\u4fdd\u969c\u529b", "\u6570\u5b57\u5316\u8d4b\u80fd\u529b"], "district_avg": [53.8, 49.34, 51.79, 50.79, 53.03, 51.99, 51.69], "same_type_avg": [42.44, 48.2, 43.91, 42.14, 44.81, 45.71, 46.06], "school_name": "\u4e0a\u5b9e\u5251\u6865", "school_values": [49.96, 42.15, 47.99, 42.61, 42.0, 47.7, 42.53]};
|
||
(function() {
|
||
const chart = echarts.init(document.getElementById('score-compare-chart'));
|
||
const option = {
|
||
tooltip: { trigger: 'axis', axisPointer: { type: 'shadow' } },
|
||
legend: { data: [scoreCompare.school_name, '区均值', '同类学校均值'], bottom: 5, textStyle: { fontSize: 12 } },
|
||
grid: { left: '3%', right: '8%', bottom: '18%', top: '5%', containLabel: true },
|
||
xAxis: { type: 'value', min: 30, max: 80 },
|
||
yAxis: { type: 'category', data: scoreCompare.categories, axisLabel: { fontSize: 12 } },
|
||
series: [
|
||
{ name: scoreCompare.school_name, type: 'bar', data: scoreCompare.school_values,
|
||
itemStyle: { color: COLORS.primary }, barWidth: '22%',
|
||
label: { show: true, position: 'right', fontSize: 11 } },
|
||
{ name: '区均值', type: 'bar', data: scoreCompare.district_avg,
|
||
itemStyle: { color: COLORS.gray }, barWidth: '22%' },
|
||
{ name: '同类学校均值', type: 'bar', data: scoreCompare.same_type_avg,
|
||
itemStyle: { color: COLORS.warning }, barWidth: '22%' },
|
||
],
|
||
};
|
||
chart.setOption(option);
|
||
window.addEventListener('resize', () => chart.resize());
|
||
})();
|
||
|
||
// ===== 2. 七维度雷达图 =====
|
||
const radarData = {"dimensions": ["\u8bfe\u7a0b\u9886\u5bfc\u529b", "\u6559\u5b66\u53d8\u9769\u529b", "\u5b66\u751f\u53d1\u5c55\u6307\u5bfc\u529b", "\u6559\u5e08\u53d1\u5c55\u652f\u6301\u529b", "\u6559\u80b2\u8d28\u91cf\u8bc4\u4f30\u529b", "\u6559\u80b2\u6761\u4ef6\u4fdd\u969c\u529b", "\u6570\u5b57\u5316\u8d4b\u80fd\u529b"], "legend": ["\u4e0a\u5b9e\u5251\u6865", "\u533a\u5747\u503c"], "series": [{"name": "\u4e0a\u5b9e\u5251\u6865", "values": [49.96, 42.15, 47.99, 42.61, 42.0, 47.7, 42.53]}, {"name": "\u533a\u5747\u503c", "values": [53.8, 49.34, 51.79, 50.79, 53.03, 51.99, 51.69]}]};
|
||
(function() {
|
||
const chart = echarts.init(document.getElementById('radar-chart'));
|
||
const option = {
|
||
tooltip: {},
|
||
legend: { data: radarData.legend, bottom: 10 },
|
||
radar: {
|
||
indicator: radarData.dimensions.map(d => ({ name: d, max: 80 })),
|
||
shape: 'polygon', splitNumber: 4,
|
||
axisName: { color: '#333', fontSize: 12 }, radius: '65%',
|
||
},
|
||
series: [{
|
||
type: 'radar',
|
||
data: radarData.series.map((s, i) => ({
|
||
value: s.values, name: s.name,
|
||
areaStyle: { opacity: i === 0 ? 0.3 : 0.1 },
|
||
lineStyle: { width: i === 0 ? 3 : 1 },
|
||
})),
|
||
}],
|
||
};
|
||
chart.setOption(option);
|
||
window.addEventListener('resize', () => chart.resize());
|
||
})();
|
||
|
||
// ===== 3. 聚类类型分布饼图 =====
|
||
const clusterDist = {"good_count": 8, "good_schools": ["\u4e0a\u7406\u9644\u4e2d", "\u4e0a\u8d22\u9644\u4e2d", "\u4ea4\u5927\u9644\u4e2d", "\u4f53\u9662\u9644\u4e2d", "\u540c\u6d4e\u4e00\u9644", "\u590d\u65e6\u9644\u4e2d", "\u63a7\u6c5f\u4e2d\u5b66", "\u6768\u6d66\u9ad8\u7ea7"], "school_cluster": "\u5f85\u63d0\u5347", "school_name": "\u4e0a\u5b9e\u5251\u6865", "total": 15, "weak_count": 7, "weak_schools": ["\u4e0a\u5b9e\u5251\u6865", "\u4e0a\u7406\u5c11\u4e91", "\u4e2d\u539f\u4e2d\u5b66", "\u540c\u6d4e\u4e2d\u5b66", "\u590d\u65e6\u5b9e\u9a8c", "\u5e02\u4e1c\u4e2d\u5b66", "\u6c11\u661f\u4e2d\u5b66"]};
|
||
if (clusterDist.total) {
|
||
(function() {
|
||
const chart = echarts.init(document.getElementById('cluster-type-dist-chart'));
|
||
const option = {
|
||
tooltip: { trigger: 'item' },
|
||
legend: { bottom: 5, textStyle: { fontSize: 11 } },
|
||
series: [{
|
||
type: 'pie', radius: ['35%', '60%'], center: ['50%', '45%'],
|
||
avoidLabelOverlap: true,
|
||
itemStyle: { borderRadius: 8, borderColor: '#fff', borderWidth: 2 },
|
||
label: { show: true, formatter: '{b}\n{c}所 ({d}%)', fontSize: 12 },
|
||
emphasis: { label: { show: true, fontSize: 14, fontWeight: 'bold' } },
|
||
data: [
|
||
{ value: clusterDist.good_count, name: '课程实施较好类', itemStyle: { color: COLORS.primary } },
|
||
{ value: clusterDist.weak_count, name: '课程实施待提升类', itemStyle: { color: COLORS.warning } },
|
||
]
|
||
}],
|
||
graphic: [{
|
||
type: 'text', left: 'center', top: '40%',
|
||
style: {
|
||
text: clusterDist.school_name + '\n属于' + (clusterDist.school_cluster === '较好' ? '较好类' : '待提升类'),
|
||
textAlign: 'center', fill: COLORS.primary, fontSize: 12, fontWeight: 'bold',
|
||
}
|
||
}],
|
||
};
|
||
chart.setOption(option);
|
||
window.addEventListener('resize', () => chart.resize());
|
||
})();
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// ===== 4. 两类学校折线对比图 =====
|
||
const clusterLine = {"dimensions": ["\u8bfe\u7a0b\u9886\u5bfc\u529b", "\u6559\u5b66\u53d8\u9769\u529b", "\u5b66\u751f\u53d1\u5c55\u6307\u5bfc\u529b", "\u6559\u5e08\u53d1\u5c55\u652f\u6301\u529b", "\u6559\u80b2\u8d28\u91cf\u8bc4\u4f30\u529b", "\u6559\u80b2\u6761\u4ef6\u4fdd\u969c\u529b", "\u6570\u5b57\u5316\u8d4b\u80fd\u529b"], "good_count": 8, "good_values": [56.83, 54.56, 52.25, 55.08, 56.87, 56.96, 54.95], "weak_count": 7, "weak_values": [50.33, 43.38, 51.26, 45.89, 48.64, 46.3, 47.96]};
|
||
if (clusterLine.dimensions) {
|
||
(function() {
|
||
const chart = echarts.init(document.getElementById('cluster-line-chart'));
|
||
const option = {
|
||
tooltip: { trigger: 'axis' },
|
||
legend: {
|
||
data: ['课程实施较好类(' + clusterLine.good_count + '所)', '课程实施待提升类(' + clusterLine.weak_count + '所)'],
|
||
bottom: 5, textStyle: { fontSize: 11 }
|
||
},
|
||
grid: { left: '3%', right: '4%', bottom: '18%', top: '8%', containLabel: true },
|
||
xAxis: {
|
||
type: 'category', data: clusterLine.dimensions.map(d => d.replace('力', '')),
|
||
axisLabel: { fontSize: 11, rotate: 15 }, boundaryGap: false,
|
||
},
|
||
yAxis: { type: 'value', min: 40, max: 60 },
|
||
series: [
|
||
{
|
||
name: '课程实施较好类(' + clusterLine.good_count + '所)',
|
||
type: 'line', data: clusterLine.good_values,
|
||
lineStyle: { width: 3, color: COLORS.primary }, itemStyle: { color: COLORS.primary },
|
||
symbol: 'circle', symbolSize: 8,
|
||
label: { show: true, position: 'top', fontSize: 10, color: COLORS.primary, formatter: p => p.value.toFixed(2) },
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
name: '课程实施待提升类(' + clusterLine.weak_count + '所)',
|
||
type: 'line', data: clusterLine.weak_values,
|
||
lineStyle: { width: 3, color: COLORS.warning }, itemStyle: { color: COLORS.warning },
|
||
symbol: 'circle', symbolSize: 8,
|
||
label: { show: true, position: 'bottom', fontSize: 10, color: COLORS.warning, formatter: p => p.value.toFixed(2) },
|
||
},
|
||
],
|
||
};
|
||
chart.setOption(option);
|
||
window.addEventListener('resize', () => chart.resize());
|
||
})();
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// ===== 5. 聚类类型对比雷达图 =====
|
||
const clusterRadar = {"dimensions": ["\u8bfe\u7a0b\u9886\u5bfc\u529b", "\u6559\u5b66\u53d8\u9769\u529b", "\u5b66\u751f\u53d1\u5c55\u6307\u5bfc\u529b", "\u6559\u5e08\u53d1\u5c55\u652f\u6301\u529b", "\u6559\u80b2\u8d28\u91cf\u8bc4\u4f30\u529b", "\u6559\u80b2\u6761\u4ef6\u4fdd\u969c\u529b", "\u6570\u5b57\u5316\u8d4b\u80fd\u529b"], "good_count": 8, "legend": ["\u8bfe\u7a0b\u5b9e\u65bd\u8f83\u597d\u7c7b", "\u8bfe\u7a0b\u5b9e\u65bd\u5f85\u63d0\u5347\u7c7b", "\u4e0a\u5b9e\u5251\u6865"], "series": [{"name": "\u8bfe\u7a0b\u5b9e\u65bd\u8f83\u597d\u7c7b", "values": [56.83, 54.56, 52.25, 55.08, 56.87, 56.96, 54.95]}, {"name": "\u8bfe\u7a0b\u5b9e\u65bd\u5f85\u63d0\u5347\u7c7b", "values": [50.33, 43.38, 51.26, 45.89, 48.64, 46.3, 47.96]}, {"name": "\u4e0a\u5b9e\u5251\u6865", "values": [49.96, 42.15, 47.99, 42.61, 42.0, 47.7, 42.53]}], "weak_count": 7};
|
||
if (clusterRadar.dimensions) {
|
||
(function() {
|
||
const chart = echarts.init(document.getElementById('cluster-radar-chart'));
|
||
const colorMap = [COLORS.cluster_good, COLORS.cluster_weak, COLORS.danger];
|
||
const option = {
|
||
tooltip: {},
|
||
legend: {
|
||
data: clusterRadar.legend, bottom: 5, textStyle: { fontSize: 11 },
|
||
formatter: function(name) {
|
||
if (name === '课程实施较好类') return name + '(' + clusterRadar.good_count + '所)';
|
||
if (name === '课程实施待提升类') return name + '(' + clusterRadar.weak_count + '所)';
|
||
return name;
|
||
}
|
||
},
|
||
radar: {
|
||
indicator: clusterRadar.dimensions.map(d => ({ name: d, max: 80 })),
|
||
shape: 'polygon', splitNumber: 4,
|
||
axisName: { color: '#333', fontSize: 11 }, radius: '60%',
|
||
},
|
||
series: [{
|
||
type: 'radar',
|
||
data: clusterRadar.series.map((s, i) => ({
|
||
value: s.values, name: s.name,
|
||
areaStyle: { opacity: i === 2 ? 0.05 : 0.15 },
|
||
lineStyle: { width: i === 2 ? 3 : 2, type: i === 2 ? 'solid' : 'dashed', color: colorMap[i] },
|
||
itemStyle: { color: colorMap[i] },
|
||
symbol: i === 2 ? 'diamond' : 'circle', symbolSize: i === 2 ? 8 : 4,
|
||
})),
|
||
}],
|
||
};
|
||
chart.setOption(option);
|
||
window.addEventListener('resize', () => chart.resize());
|
||
})();
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// ===== 6. 区内学校排名条形图 =====
|
||
const rankingData = {"current_school": "\u4e0a\u5b9e\u5251\u6865", "dim_scores": {"\u5b66\u751f\u53d1\u5c55\u6307\u5bfc\u529b": [60.36, 55.89, 46.47, 56.1, 50.42, 48.9, 52.69, 47.16, 51.07, 60.01, 45.37, 51.18, 54.55, 48.67, 47.99], "\u6559\u5b66\u53d8\u9769\u529b": [59.15, 54.17, 57.93, 55.88, 48.39, 51.87, 58.18, 50.95, 46.44, 46.49, 47.51, 45.2, 46.29, 29.56, 42.15], "\u6559\u5e08\u53d1\u5c55\u652f\u6301\u529b": [56.37, 63.48, 65.14, 55.51, 54.39, 49.56, 43.18, 53.02, 53.01, 44.06, 45.32, 45.54, 45.85, 44.86, 42.61], "\u6559\u80b2\u6761\u4ef6\u4fdd\u969c\u529b": [62.11, 52.7, 56.04, 53.62, 59.51, 59.41, 53.49, 58.81, 42.67, 39.96, 50.62, 48.25, 47.47, 47.47, 47.7], "\u6559\u80b2\u8d28\u91cf\u8bc4\u4f30\u529b": [61.13, 58.73, 57.58, 56.16, 59.75, 51.64, 58.46, 51.51, 51.89, 49.92, 53.63, 46.66, 45.96, 50.42, 42.0], "\u6570\u5b57\u5316\u8d4b\u80fd\u529b": [57.31, 60.92, 48.3, 61.35, 57.31, 55.42, 47.76, 51.22, 53.34, 53.75, 47.95, 54.07, 40.05, 44.0, 42.53], "\u8bfe\u7a0b\u9886\u5bfc\u529b": [61.42, 58.46, 61.3, 53.53, 56.1, 56.85, 53.21, 53.79, 54.76, 51.44, 51.7, 48.9, 42.9, 52.69, 49.96]}, "dimensions": ["\u8bfe\u7a0b\u9886\u5bfc\u529b", "\u6559\u5b66\u53d8\u9769\u529b", "\u5b66\u751f\u53d1\u5c55\u6307\u5bfc\u529b", "\u6559\u5e08\u53d1\u5c55\u652f\u6301\u529b", "\u6559\u80b2\u8d28\u91cf\u8bc4\u4f30\u529b", "\u6559\u80b2\u6761\u4ef6\u4fdd\u969c\u529b", "\u6570\u5b57\u5316\u8d4b\u80fd\u529b"], "schools": ["\u540c\u6d4e\u4e00\u9644", "\u590d\u65e6\u9644\u4e2d", "\u4ea4\u5927\u9644\u4e2d", "\u4e0a\u7406\u9644\u4e2d", "\u63a7\u6c5f\u4e2d\u5b66", "\u4e0a\u8d22\u9644\u4e2d", "\u4f53\u9662\u9644\u4e2d", "\u6768\u6d66\u9ad8\u7ea7", "\u4e2d\u539f\u4e2d\u5b66", "\u4e0a\u7406\u5c11\u4e91", "\u590d\u65e6\u5b9e\u9a8c", "\u6c11\u661f\u4e2d\u5b66", "\u540c\u6d4e\u4e2d\u5b66", "\u5e02\u4e1c\u4e2d\u5b66", "\u4e0a\u5b9e\u5251\u6865"], "total_scores": [59.69, 57.76, 56.11, 56.02, 55.12, 53.38, 52.42, 52.35, 50.45, 49.38, 48.87, 48.54, 46.15, 45.38, 44.99]};
|
||
if (rankingData.schools) {
|
||
(function() {
|
||
const chart = echarts.init(document.getElementById('school-ranking-chart'));
|
||
const barColors = rankingData.schools.map(s => s === rankingData.current_school ? COLORS.primary : COLORS.gray);
|
||
const option = {
|
||
tooltip: { trigger: 'axis', axisPointer: { type: 'shadow' } },
|
||
grid: { left: '3%', right: '12%', bottom: '5%', top: '5%', containLabel: true },
|
||
xAxis: { type: 'value', min: 35, max: 65 },
|
||
yAxis: { type: 'category', data: rankingData.schools.slice().reverse(),
|
||
axisLabel: { fontSize: 12, fontWeight: function(v) { return v === rankingData.current_school ? 'bold' : 'normal'; } } },
|
||
series: [{
|
||
type: 'bar', barWidth: '50%',
|
||
data: rankingData.total_scores.slice().reverse().map((v, i) => ({
|
||
value: v, itemStyle: { color: barColors.slice().reverse()[i] },
|
||
})),
|
||
label: { show: true, position: 'right', fontSize: 12, fontWeight: 'bold', formatter: p => p.value.toFixed(1) },
|
||
}],
|
||
};
|
||
chart.setOption(option);
|
||
window.addEventListener('resize', () => chart.resize());
|
||
})();
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// ===== 7. 维度间相关性热力图 =====
|
||
const corrData = {"data": [[0, 0, 1.0], [0, 1, 0.531], [0, 2, 0.048], [0, 3, 0.751], [0, 4, 0.769], [0, 5, 0.6], [0, 6, 0.571], [1, 0, 0.531], [1, 1, 1.0], [1, 2, 0.307], [1, 3, 0.565], [1, 4, 0.657], [1, 5, 0.574], [1, 6, 0.495], [2, 0, 0.048], [2, 1, 0.307], [2, 2, 1.0], [2, 3, 0.089], [2, 4, 0.256], [2, 5, -0.117], [2, 6, 0.446], [3, 0, 0.751], [3, 1, 0.565], [3, 2, 0.089], [3, 3, 1.0], [3, 4, 0.65], [3, 5, 0.495], [3, 6, 0.558], [4, 0, 0.769], [4, 1, 0.657], [4, 2, 0.256], [4, 3, 0.65], [4, 4, 1.0], [4, 5, 0.61], [4, 6, 0.596], [5, 0, 0.6], [5, 1, 0.574], [5, 2, -0.117], [5, 3, 0.495], [5, 4, 0.61], [5, 5, 1.0], [5, 6, 0.355], [6, 0, 0.571], [6, 1, 0.495], [6, 2, 0.446], [6, 3, 0.558], [6, 4, 0.596], [6, 5, 0.355], [6, 6, 1.0]], "dimensions": ["\u8bfe\u7a0b\u9886\u5bfc\u529b", "\u6559\u5b66\u53d8\u9769\u529b", "\u5b66\u751f\u53d1\u5c55\u6307\u5bfc\u529b", "\u6559\u5e08\u53d1\u5c55\u652f\u6301\u529b", "\u6559\u80b2\u8d28\u91cf\u8bc4\u4f30\u529b", "\u6559\u80b2\u6761\u4ef6\u4fdd\u969c\u529b", "\u6570\u5b57\u5316\u8d4b\u80fd\u529b"], "short_names": ["\u8bfe\u7a0b\u9886\u5bfc", "\u6559\u5b66\u53d8\u9769", "\u5b66\u751f\u53d1\u5c55\u6307\u5bfc", "\u6559\u5e08\u53d1\u5c55\u652f\u6301", "\u8d28\u91cf\u8bc4\u4f30", "\u6761\u4ef6\u4fdd\u969c", "\u6570\u5b57\u5316\u8d4b\u80fd"]};
|
||
if (corrData.dimensions) {
|
||
(function() {
|
||
const chart = echarts.init(document.getElementById('correlation-chart'));
|
||
const names = corrData.short_names || corrData.dimensions;
|
||
const option = {
|
||
tooltip: { position: 'top', formatter: p => corrData.dimensions[p.value[0]] + ' × ' + corrData.dimensions[p.value[1]] + '<br/>相关系数: ' + p.value[2] },
|
||
grid: { left: '15%', right: '12%', bottom: '18%', top: '3%' },
|
||
xAxis: { type: 'category', data: names, axisLabel: { rotate: 30, fontSize: 11 }, splitArea: { show: true } },
|
||
yAxis: { type: 'category', data: names, axisLabel: { fontSize: 11 }, splitArea: { show: true } },
|
||
visualMap: { min: -1, max: 1, calculable: true, orient: 'vertical', right: 0, top: 'center',
|
||
inRange: { color: ['#fee2e2', '#fef3c7', '#f3f4f6', '#dbeafe', '#2563eb'] }, textStyle: { fontSize: 11 } },
|
||
series: [{
|
||
type: 'heatmap', data: corrData.data,
|
||
label: { show: true, fontSize: 11, formatter: p => p.value[2].toFixed(2) },
|
||
itemStyle: { borderWidth: 2, borderColor: '#fff' },
|
||
}],
|
||
};
|
||
chart.setOption(option);
|
||
window.addEventListener('resize', () => chart.resize());
|
||
})();
|
||
}
|
||
</script>
|
||
|
||
<script>
|
||
// ===== 8. 各维度独立得分柱状图 =====
|
||
const dimScoreBars = {"part3": {"dim_name": "\u8bfe\u7a0b\u9886\u5bfc\u529b", "district_avg": 53.8, "same_type_avg": 42.44, "school_name": "\u4e0a\u5b9e\u5251\u6865", "school_score": 49.96}, "part4": {"dim_name": "\u6559\u5b66\u53d8\u9769\u529b", "district_avg": 49.34, "same_type_avg": 48.2, "school_name": "\u4e0a\u5b9e\u5251\u6865", "school_score": 42.15}, "part5": {"dim_name": "\u5b66\u751f\u53d1\u5c55\u6307\u5bfc\u529b", "district_avg": 51.79, "same_type_avg": 43.91, "school_name": "\u4e0a\u5b9e\u5251\u6865", "school_score": 47.99}, "part6": {"dim_name": "\u6559\u5e08\u53d1\u5c55\u652f\u6301\u529b", "district_avg": 50.79, "same_type_avg": 42.14, "school_name": "\u4e0a\u5b9e\u5251\u6865", "school_score": 42.61}, "part7": {"dim_name": "\u6559\u80b2\u8d28\u91cf\u8bc4\u4f30\u529b", "district_avg": 53.03, "same_type_avg": 44.81, "school_name": "\u4e0a\u5b9e\u5251\u6865", "school_score": 42.0}, "part8": {"dim_name": "\u6559\u80b2\u6761\u4ef6\u4fdd\u969c\u529b", "district_avg": 51.99, "same_type_avg": 45.71, "school_name": "\u4e0a\u5b9e\u5251\u6865", "school_score": 47.7}, "part9": {"dim_name": "\u6570\u5b57\u5316\u8d4b\u80fd\u529b", "district_avg": 51.69, "same_type_avg": 46.06, "school_name": "\u4e0a\u5b9e\u5251\u6865", "school_score": 42.53}};
|
||
Object.keys(dimScoreBars).forEach(partId => {
|
||
const el = document.getElementById('dim-score-' + partId);
|
||
if (!el) return;
|
||
const chart = echarts.init(el);
|
||
const d = dimScoreBars[partId];
|
||
const option = {
|
||
tooltip: { trigger: 'axis', axisPointer: { type: 'shadow' } },
|
||
grid: { left: '8%', right: '8%', bottom: '12%', top: '8%', containLabel: true },
|
||
xAxis: { type: 'category', data: [d.school_name, '区均值', '同类学校'], axisLabel: { fontSize: 12 } },
|
||
yAxis: { type: 'value', min: 30, max: 80 },
|
||
series: [{
|
||
type: 'bar', barWidth: '40%',
|
||
data: [
|
||
{ value: d.school_score, itemStyle: { color: COLORS.primary } },
|
||
{ value: d.district_avg, itemStyle: { color: COLORS.gray } },
|
||
{ value: d.same_type_avg, itemStyle: { color: COLORS.warning } },
|
||
],
|
||
label: { show: true, position: 'top', fontSize: 13, fontWeight: 'bold', formatter: p => p.value.toFixed(2) },
|
||
markLine: { silent: true, data: [{ yAxis: 50, label: { formatter: '均值基线(50)', fontSize: 10 }, lineStyle: { color: '#ef4444', type: 'dashed' } }] },
|
||
}],
|
||
};
|
||
chart.setOption(option);
|
||
window.addEventListener('resize', () => chart.resize());
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
// ===== 9. 各维度子维度雷达图 =====
|
||
const dimSubRadar = {"part3": {"district_avg": [53.68, 55.31, 52.41], "same_type_avg": [53.68, 55.31, 52.41], "school_name": "\u4e0a\u5b9e\u5251\u6865", "school_values": [54.26, 43.96, 51.67], "sub_dims": ["\u56fd\u5bb6\u6807\u51c6\u9075\u5faa", "\u8bfe\u7a0b\u7ed3\u6784\u5efa\u8bbe", "\u8bfe\u7a0b\u89c4\u8303\u843d\u5b9e"], "type": "radar"}, "part4": {"district_avg": [49.19, 49.5], "same_type_avg": [49.19, 49.5], "school_name": "\u4e0a\u5b9e\u5251\u6865", "school_values": [50.78, 33.52], "sub_dims": ["\u6559\u5b66\u65b9\u5f0f\u53d8\u9769", "\u4f5c\u4e1a\u8bbe\u8ba1\u4e0e\u7ba1\u7406\u53d8\u9769"], "type": "bar"}, "part5": {"district_avg": [52.18, 51.4], "same_type_avg": [52.18, 51.4], "school_name": "\u4e0a\u5b9e\u5251\u6865", "school_values": [34.82, 61.16], "sub_dims": ["\u5b66\u79d1\u53d1\u5c55\u7684\u4e2a\u6027\u5316\u8f85\u5bfc", "\u5b66\u751f\u751f\u6daf\u53d1\u5c55\u6307\u5bfc"], "type": "bar"}, "part6": {"district_avg": [55.44, 46.54, 50.4], "same_type_avg": [55.44, 46.54, 50.4], "school_name": "\u4e0a\u5b9e\u5251\u6865", "school_values": [46.35, 39.09, 42.4], "sub_dims": ["\u57f9\u8bad\u652f\u6301", "\u6559\u7814\u652f\u6301", "\u9879\u76ee\u652f\u6301"], "type": "radar"}, "part7": {"district_avg": [48.93, 55.88, 53.66, 53.65], "same_type_avg": [48.93, 55.88, 53.66, 53.65], "school_name": "\u4e0a\u5b9e\u5251\u6865", "school_values": [39.58, 43.93, 41.29, 43.19], "sub_dims": ["\u79d1\u5b66\u8bc4\u4ef7\u89c2", "\u5b66\u4e1a\u8d28\u91cf\u8bc4\u4f30", "\u7efc\u5408\u7d20\u8d28\u8bc4\u4f30", "\u5b9e\u8df5\u6d3b\u52a8\u8bc4\u4f30"], "type": "radar"}, "part8": {"district_avg": [51.26, 51.47, 53.24], "same_type_avg": [51.26, 51.47, 53.24], "school_name": "\u4e0a\u5b9e\u5251\u6865", "school_values": [60.54, 45.09, 37.47], "sub_dims": ["\u533a\u57df\u63a8\u8fdb", "\u73af\u5883\u652f\u6301", "\u8d44\u6e90\u652f\u6301"], "type": "radar"}, "part9": {"district_avg": [52.59, 48.64, 53.83], "same_type_avg": [52.59, 48.64, 53.83], "school_name": "\u4e0a\u5b9e\u5251\u6865", "school_values": [47.62, 41.06, 38.9], "sub_dims": ["\u6559\u5b66\u65b9\u5f0f\u521b\u65b0", "\u8bc4\u4ef7\u7cbe\u51c6\u5316\u4e0e\u4e2a\u6027\u5316", "\u8bfe\u7a0b\u8fed\u4ee3\u4f18\u5316"], "type": "radar"}};
|
||
Object.keys(dimSubRadar).forEach(partId => {
|
||
const el = document.getElementById('sub-radar-' + partId);
|
||
if (!el) return;
|
||
const chart = echarts.init(el);
|
||
const d = dimSubRadar[partId];
|
||
|
||
if (d.type === 'radar' && d.sub_dims && d.sub_dims.length >= 3) {
|
||
const option = {
|
||
tooltip: {},
|
||
legend: { data: [d.school_name, '区均值', '同类学校'], bottom: 5, textStyle: { fontSize: 11 } },
|
||
radar: {
|
||
indicator: d.sub_dims.map(sd => ({ name: sd, max: 80 })),
|
||
shape: 'polygon', splitNumber: 4, axisName: { color: '#333', fontSize: 10 }, radius: '60%',
|
||
},
|
||
series: [{
|
||
type: 'radar',
|
||
data: [
|
||
{ value: d.school_values, name: d.school_name,
|
||
areaStyle: { opacity: 0.3, color: COLORS.primary },
|
||
lineStyle: { width: 3, color: COLORS.primary }, itemStyle: { color: COLORS.primary } },
|
||
{ value: d.district_avg, name: '区均值',
|
||
lineStyle: { width: 1, type: 'dashed', color: COLORS.grayDark }, itemStyle: { color: COLORS.grayDark } },
|
||
{ value: d.same_type_avg, name: '同类学校',
|
||
lineStyle: { width: 1, type: 'dotted', color: COLORS.warning }, itemStyle: { color: COLORS.warning } },
|
||
],
|
||
}],
|
||
};
|
||
chart.setOption(option);
|
||
} else {
|
||
const option = {
|
||
tooltip: { trigger: 'axis' },
|
||
legend: { data: [d.school_name, '区均值', '同类学校'], bottom: 5, textStyle: { fontSize: 11 } },
|
||
grid: { left: '3%', right: '4%', bottom: '18%', top: '5%', containLabel: true },
|
||
xAxis: { type: 'category', data: d.sub_dims, axisLabel: { fontSize: 11 } },
|
||
yAxis: { type: 'value', min: 20, max: 80 },
|
||
series: [
|
||
{ name: d.school_name, type: 'bar', data: d.school_values,
|
||
itemStyle: { color: COLORS.primary }, barWidth: '22%',
|
||
label: { show: true, position: 'top', fontSize: 10 } },
|
||
{ name: '区均值', type: 'bar', data: d.district_avg, itemStyle: { color: COLORS.gray }, barWidth: '22%' },
|
||
{ name: '同类学校', type: 'bar', data: d.same_type_avg, itemStyle: { color: COLORS.warning }, barWidth: '22%' },
|
||
],
|
||
};
|
||
chart.setOption(option);
|
||
}
|
||
window.addEventListener('resize', () => chart.resize());
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
// ===== 10. 各维度子维度柱状图 =====
|
||
const subDimCharts = {"part3": {"avg_values": [53.68, 55.31, 52.41], "categories": ["\u56fd\u5bb6\u6807\u51c6\u9075\u5faa", "\u8bfe\u7a0b\u7ed3\u6784\u5efa\u8bbe", "\u8bfe\u7a0b\u89c4\u8303\u843d\u5b9e"], "school_values": [54.26, 43.96, 51.67]}, "part4": {"avg_values": [49.19, 49.5], "categories": ["\u6559\u5b66\u65b9\u5f0f\u53d8\u9769", "\u4f5c\u4e1a\u8bbe\u8ba1\u4e0e\u7ba1\u7406\u53d8\u9769"], "school_values": [50.78, 33.52]}, "part5": {"avg_values": [52.18, 51.4], "categories": ["\u5b66\u79d1\u53d1\u5c55\u7684\u4e2a\u6027\u5316\u8f85\u5bfc", "\u5b66\u751f\u751f\u6daf\u53d1\u5c55\u6307\u5bfc"], "school_values": [34.82, 61.16]}, "part6": {"avg_values": [55.44, 46.54, 50.4], "categories": ["\u57f9\u8bad\u652f\u6301", "\u6559\u7814\u652f\u6301", "\u9879\u76ee\u652f\u6301"], "school_values": [46.35, 39.09, 42.4]}, "part7": {"avg_values": [48.93, 55.88, 53.66, 53.65], "categories": ["\u79d1\u5b66\u8bc4\u4ef7\u89c2", "\u5b66\u4e1a\u8d28\u91cf\u8bc4\u4f30", "\u7efc\u5408\u7d20\u8d28\u8bc4\u4f30", "\u5b9e\u8df5\u6d3b\u52a8\u8bc4\u4f30"], "school_values": [39.58, 43.93, 41.29, 43.19]}, "part8": {"avg_values": [51.26, 51.47, 53.24], "categories": ["\u533a\u57df\u63a8\u8fdb", "\u73af\u5883\u652f\u6301", "\u8d44\u6e90\u652f\u6301"], "school_values": [60.54, 45.09, 37.47]}, "part9": {"avg_values": [52.59, 48.64, 53.83], "categories": ["\u6559\u5b66\u65b9\u5f0f\u521b\u65b0", "\u8bc4\u4ef7\u7cbe\u51c6\u5316\u4e0e\u4e2a\u6027\u5316", "\u8bfe\u7a0b\u8fed\u4ee3\u4f18\u5316"], "school_values": [47.62, 41.06, 38.9]}};
|
||
Object.keys(subDimCharts).forEach(chartId => {
|
||
const el = document.getElementById('chart-' + chartId);
|
||
if (!el) return;
|
||
const chart = echarts.init(el);
|
||
const d = subDimCharts[chartId];
|
||
const option = {
|
||
tooltip: { trigger: 'axis' },
|
||
legend: { data: ['上实剑桥', '区均值'], bottom: 5 },
|
||
grid: { left: '3%', right: '4%', bottom: '18%', containLabel: true },
|
||
xAxis: { type: 'category', data: d.categories, axisLabel: { rotate: 15, fontSize: 11 } },
|
||
yAxis: { type: 'value', min: 20, max: 80 },
|
||
series: [
|
||
{ name: '上实剑桥', type: 'bar', data: d.school_values,
|
||
itemStyle: { color: COLORS.primary }, barWidth: '28%',
|
||
label: { show: true, position: 'top', fontSize: 10 } },
|
||
{ name: '区均值', type: 'bar', data: d.avg_values, itemStyle: { color: COLORS.gray }, barWidth: '28%' },
|
||
{ name: '均值基线(50)', type: 'line', data: d.categories.map(() => 50),
|
||
lineStyle: { color: '#ef4444', type: 'dashed', width: 1 }, symbol: 'none' },
|
||
],
|
||
};
|
||
chart.setOption(option);
|
||
window.addEventListener('resize', () => chart.resize());
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
// ===== 11. 水平分布堆叠条形图 =====
|
||
const levelDistData = {"part3": {"categories": ["\u56fd\u5bb6\u6807\u51c6\u9075\u5faa", "\u8bfe\u7a0b\u7ed3\u6784\u5efa\u8bbe", "\u8bfe\u7a0b\u89c4\u8303\u843d\u5b9e"], "level1": [0.0, 20.0, 20.0], "level2": [6.7, 20.0, 20.0], "level3": [93.3, 13.3, 40.0], "level4": [0.0, 46.7, 20.0], "school_levels": [3, 1, 3]}, "part4": {"categories": ["\u6559\u5b66\u65b9\u5f0f\u53d8\u9769", "\u4f5c\u4e1a\u8bbe\u8ba1\u4e0e\u7ba1\u7406\u53d8\u9769"], "level1": [6.7, 40.0], "level2": [13.3, 20.0], "level3": [53.3, 6.7], "level4": [26.7, 33.3], "school_levels": [3, 1]}, "part5": {"categories": ["\u5b66\u79d1\u53d1\u5c55\u7684\u4e2a\u6027\u5316\u8f85\u5bfc", "\u5b66\u751f\u751f\u6daf\u53d1\u5c55\u6307\u5bfc"], "level1": [13.3, 13.3], "level2": [20.0, 20.0], "level3": [60.0, 40.0], "level4": [6.7, 26.7], "school_levels": [1, 4]}, "part6": {"categories": ["\u57f9\u8bad\u652f\u6301", "\u6559\u7814\u652f\u6301", "\u9879\u76ee\u652f\u6301"], "level1": [40.0, 73.3, 13.3], "level2": [0.0, 6.7, 40.0], "level3": [6.7, 6.7, 26.7], "level4": [53.3, 13.3, 20.0], "school_levels": [1, 1, 1]}, "part7": {"categories": ["\u79d1\u5b66\u8bc4\u4ef7\u89c2", "\u5b66\u4e1a\u8d28\u91cf\u8bc4\u4f30", "\u7efc\u5408\u7d20\u8d28\u8bc4\u4f30", "\u5b9e\u8df5\u6d3b\u52a8\u8bc4\u4f30"], "level1": [33.3, 0.0, 0.0, 13.3], "level2": [6.7, 6.7, 26.7, 6.7], "level3": [46.7, 26.7, 33.3, 6.7], "level4": [13.3, 66.7, 40.0, 73.3], "school_levels": [1, 2, 2, 2]}, "part8": {"categories": ["\u533a\u57df\u63a8\u8fdb", "\u73af\u5883\u652f\u6301", "\u8d44\u6e90\u652f\u6301"], "level1": [13.3, 0.0, 6.7], "level2": [46.7, 60.0, 33.3], "level3": [6.7, 6.7, 26.7], "level4": [33.3, 33.3, 33.3], "school_levels": [4, 2, 1]}, "part9": {"categories": ["\u6559\u5b66\u65b9\u5f0f\u521b\u65b0", "\u8bc4\u4ef7\u7cbe\u51c6\u5316\u4e0e\u4e2a\u6027\u5316", "\u8bfe\u7a0b\u8fed\u4ee3\u4f18\u5316"], "level1": [6.7, 20.0, 26.7], "level2": [6.7, 33.3, 0.0], "level3": [40.0, 33.3, 0.0], "level4": [46.7, 13.3, 73.3], "school_levels": [3, 2, 1]}};
|
||
Object.keys(levelDistData).forEach(chartId => {
|
||
const el = document.getElementById('level-' + chartId);
|
||
if (!el) return;
|
||
const chart = echarts.init(el);
|
||
const d = levelDistData[chartId];
|
||
if (!d.categories || d.categories.length === 0) return;
|
||
const option = {
|
||
tooltip: { trigger: 'axis', axisPointer: { type: 'shadow' },
|
||
formatter: function(params) {
|
||
let s = params[0].axisValue + '<br/>';
|
||
params.forEach(p => { s += p.marker + ' ' + p.seriesName + ': ' + p.value + '%<br/>'; });
|
||
const idx = d.categories.indexOf(params[0].axisValue);
|
||
if (idx >= 0) s += '<strong>上实剑桥：水平' + d.school_levels[idx] + '</strong>';
|
||
return s;
|
||
}
|
||
},
|
||
legend: { data: ['水平一', '水平二', '水平三', '水平四'], bottom: 5, textStyle: { fontSize: 11 } },
|
||
grid: { left: '3%', right: '4%', bottom: '18%', top: '5%', containLabel: true },
|
||
xAxis: { type: 'category', data: d.categories, axisLabel: { fontSize: 11, rotate: 15 } },
|
||
yAxis: { type: 'value', max: 100, axisLabel: { formatter: '{value}%' } },
|
||
series: [
|
||
{ name: '水平一', type: 'bar', stack: 'total', data: d.level1, itemStyle: { color: COLORS.level1 }, barWidth: '50%' },
|
||
{ name: '水平二', type: 'bar', stack: 'total', data: d.level2, itemStyle: { color: COLORS.level2 } },
|
||
{ name: '水平三', type: 'bar', stack: 'total', data: d.level3, itemStyle: { color: COLORS.level3 } },
|
||
{ name: '水平四', type: 'bar', stack: 'total', data: d.level4, itemStyle: { color: COLORS.level4 } },
|
||
],
|
||
};
|
||
chart.setOption(option);
|
||
window.addEventListener('resize', () => chart.resize());
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
// ===== 12. 各维度聚类散点图（2D / 3D） =====
|
||
const dimScatterData = {"part3": {"axes": ["\u56fd\u5bb6\u6807\u51c6\u9075\u5faa", "\u8bfe\u7a0b\u7ed3\u6784\u5efa\u8bbe", "\u8bfe\u7a0b\u89c4\u8303\u843d\u5b9e"], "dim_name": "\u8bfe\u7a0b\u9886\u5bfc\u529b", "good_data": [[54.26, 59.69, 46.63], [54.26, 66.85, 49.43], [54.26, 52.18, 57.84], [54.26, 68.99, 60.64], [54.26, 69.35, 60.64], [54.26, 63.27, 57.84], [54.26, 66.85, 47.19], [54.26, 46.46, 60.64]], "school_name": "\u4e0a\u5b9e\u5251\u6865", "school_point": [54.26, 43.96, 51.67], "type": "3d", "weak_data": [[54.26, 45.03, 55.04], [54.26, 51.47, 53.92], [45.61, 40.38, 42.71], [54.26, 44.67, 56.16], [54.26, 61.84, 41.96], [54.26, 48.61, 43.83]]}, "part4": {"axes": ["\u6559\u5b66\u65b9\u5f0f\u53d8\u9769", "\u4f5c\u4e1a\u8bbe\u8ba1\u4e0e\u7ba1\u7406\u53d8\u9769"], "dim_name": "\u6559\u5b66\u53d8\u9769\u529b", "good_data": [[53.46, 58.29], [51.27, 52.47], [54.36, 61.51], [52.93, 63.43], [51.82, 66.49], [50.99, 57.34], [49.61, 47.18], [56.92, 44.99]], "school_name": "\u4e0a\u5b9e\u5251\u6865", "school_point": [50.78, 33.52], "type": "2d", "weak_data": [[49.06, 43.91], [48.7, 44.18], [54.03, 38.54], [48.49, 46.52], [11.12, 48.01], [54.31, 36.1]]}, "part5": {"axes": ["\u5b66\u79d1\u53d1\u5c55\u7684\u4e2a\u6027\u5316\u8f85\u5bfc", "\u5b66\u751f\u751f\u6daf\u53d1\u5c55\u6307\u5bfc"], "dim_name": "\u5b66\u751f\u53d1\u5c55\u6307\u5bfc\u529b", "good_data": [[64.33, 55.68], [55.14, 57.05], [57.4, 44.74], [49.7, 55.68], [59.56, 61.16], [53.42, 55.68], [50.63, 61.16], [46.67, 55.68]], "school_name": "\u4e0a\u5b9e\u5251\u6865", "school_point": [34.82, 61.16], "type": "2d", "weak_data": [[58.53, 39.26], [42.72, 50.21], [56.95, 33.79], [52.6, 44.74], [50.63, 50.21], [49.57, 44.74]]}, "part6": {"axes": ["\u57f9\u8bad\u652f\u6301", "\u6559\u7814\u652f\u6301", "\u9879\u76ee\u652f\u6301"], "dim_name": "\u6559\u5e08\u53d1\u5c55\u652f\u6301\u529b", "good_data": [[67.58, 44.58, 54.37], [53.52, 44.22, 50.95], [56.1, 44.56, 58.36], [73.77, 61.0, 60.64], [63.65, 52.81, 52.66], [80.17, 58.19, 52.09], [67.38, 49.98, 45.82], [53.18, 46.89, 59.0]], "school_name": "\u4e0a\u5b9e\u5251\u6865", "school_point": [46.35, 39.09, 42.4], "type": "3d", "weak_data": [[47.13, 37.54, 47.53], [40.73, 41.84, 46.96], [42.86, 45.44, 49.24], [50.29, 43.27, 42.4], [44.46, 42.98, 47.15], [44.46, 45.77, 46.39]]}, "part7": {"axes": ["\u79d1\u5b66\u8bc4\u4ef7\u89c2", "\u5b66\u4e1a\u8d28\u91cf\u8bc4\u4f30"], "dim_name": "\u6559\u80b2\u8d28\u91cf\u8bc4\u4f30\u529b", "good_data": [[56.1, 64.21], [51.79, 57.63], [57.69, 57.17], [54.36, 60.29], [59.7, 64.44], [53.47, 54.29], [54.36, 57.69], [56.36, 59.77]], "school_name": "\u4e0a\u5b9e\u5251\u6865", "school_point": [39.58, 43.93], "type": "2d", "weak_data": [[37.68, 57.69], [51.69, 59.25], [41.02, 50.94], [30.96, 51.82], [49.51, 50.18], [39.69, 48.86]]}, "part8": {"axes": ["\u533a\u57df\u63a8\u8fdb", "\u73af\u5883\u652f\u6301", "\u8d44\u6e90\u652f\u6301"], "dim_name": "\u6559\u80b2\u6761\u4ef6\u4fdd\u969c\u529b", "good_data": [[41.97, 62.85, 56.04], [60.54, 62.85, 54.85], [41.97, 62.85, 63.29], [60.54, 45.09, 54.85], [60.54, 62.85, 62.93], [51.26, 45.09, 61.76], [60.54, 53.97, 64.01], [55.9, 62.85, 57.69]], "school_name": "\u4e0a\u5b9e\u5251\u6865", "school_point": [60.54, 45.09, 37.47], "type": "3d", "weak_data": [[32.69, 45.09, 42.1], [37.33, 45.09, 45.6], [51.26, 45.09, 46.05], [51.26, 45.09, 55.5], [51.26, 43.12, 48.03], [51.26, 45.09, 48.39]]}, "part9": {"axes": ["\u6559\u5b66\u65b9\u5f0f\u521b\u65b0", "\u8bc4\u4ef7\u7cbe\u51c6\u5316\u4e0e\u4e2a\u6027\u5316", "\u8bfe\u7a0b\u8fed\u4ee3\u4f18\u5316"], "dim_name": "\u6570\u5b57\u5316\u8d4b\u80fd\u529b", "good_data": [[49.26, 52.95, 59.03], [60.15, 64.85, 59.03], [59.93, 47.29, 59.03], [55.98, 45.02, 59.03], [59.93, 52.95, 59.03], [62.84, 60.89, 59.03], [59.93, 52.95, 59.03], [50.23, 52.95, 59.03]], "school_name": "\u4e0a\u5b9e\u5251\u6865", "school_point": [47.62, 41.06, 38.9], "type": "3d", "weak_data": [[57.02, 48.99, 38.9], [48.29, 35.96, 59.03], [41.5, 39.74, 38.9], [48.87, 35.96, 59.03], [37.63, 52.95, 41.42], [49.62, 45.02, 59.03]]}};
|
||
Object.keys(dimScatterData).forEach(partId => {
|
||
const el = document.getElementById('scatter-' + partId);
|
||
if (!el) return;
|
||
const d = dimScatterData[partId];
|
||
if (!d || !d.axes) return;
|
||
const chart = echarts.init(el);
|
||
|
||
if (d.type === '3d') {
|
||
const axes = d.axes;
|
||
const option = {
|
||
tooltip: {
|
||
formatter: function(params) {
|
||
const v = params.value || (params.data && params.data.value);
|
||
if (!v) return '';
|
||
return params.seriesName + '<br/>'
|
||
+ axes[0] + ': ' + (typeof v[0] === 'number' ? v[0].toFixed(2) : v[0]) + '<br/>'
|
||
+ axes[1] + ': ' + (typeof v[1] === 'number' ? v[1].toFixed(2) : v[1]) + '<br/>'
|
||
+ axes[2] + ': ' + (typeof v[2] === 'number' ? v[2].toFixed(2) : v[2]);
|
||
}
|
||
},
|
||
legend: { data: ['较好类', '待提升类', d.school_name], bottom: 5, textStyle: { fontSize: 11 } },
|
||
xAxis3D: { name: d.axes[0], type: 'value', nameTextStyle: { fontSize: 10 } },
|
||
yAxis3D: { name: d.axes[1], type: 'value', nameTextStyle: { fontSize: 10 } },
|
||
zAxis3D: { name: d.axes[2], type: 'value', nameTextStyle: { fontSize: 10 } },
|
||
grid3D: {
|
||
viewControl: { autoRotate: true, autoRotateSpeed: 5, distance: 200, alpha: 20, beta: 30 },
|
||
boxWidth: 100, boxHeight: 100, boxDepth: 100,
|
||
light: { main: { intensity: 1.2, shadow: true }, ambient: { intensity: 0.3 } },
|
||
},
|
||
series: [
|
||
{ name: '较好类', type: 'scatter3D', data: d.good_data.map(p => ({ value: p })),
|
||
symbolSize: 8, itemStyle: { color: COLORS.success, opacity: 0.7 } },
|
||
{ name: '待提升类', type: 'scatter3D', data: d.weak_data.map(p => ({ value: p })),
|
||
symbolSize: 8, itemStyle: { color: COLORS.danger, opacity: 0.7 } },
|
||
{ name: d.school_name, type: 'scatter3D',
|
||
data: d.school_point ? [{ value: d.school_point }] : [],
|
||
symbolSize: 18, itemStyle: { color: COLORS.primary, borderColor: '#fff', borderWidth: 2 },
|
||
label: { show: true, formatter: d.school_name, textStyle: { fontSize: 12, fontWeight: 'bold', color: COLORS.primary } } },
|
||
],
|
||
};
|
||
chart.setOption(option);
|
||
} else {
|
||
const option = {
|
||
tooltip: { formatter: p => (p.data && p.data.name) ? p.data.name : d.axes[0] + ': ' + p.value[0] + '<br/>' + d.axes[1] + ': ' + p.value[1] },
|
||
legend: { data: ['较好类', '待提升类', d.school_name], bottom: 5, textStyle: { fontSize: 11 } },
|
||
grid: { left: '10%', right: '8%', bottom: '18%', top: '5%' },
|
||
xAxis: { name: d.axes[0], nameLocation: 'center', nameGap: 30, nameTextStyle: { fontSize: 11 }, splitLine: { show: true, lineStyle: { type: 'dashed' } } },
|
||
yAxis: { name: d.axes[1], nameLocation: 'center', nameGap: 40, nameTextStyle: { fontSize: 11 }, splitLine: { show: true, lineStyle: { type: 'dashed' } } },
|
||
series: [
|
||
{ name: '较好类', type: 'scatter', data: d.good_data, symbolSize: 10, itemStyle: { color: COLORS.success, opacity: 0.6 } },
|
||
{ name: '待提升类', type: 'scatter', data: d.weak_data, symbolSize: 10, itemStyle: { color: COLORS.danger, opacity: 0.6 } },
|
||
{ name: d.school_name, type: 'scatter',
|
||
data: d.school_point ? [{ value: d.school_point, name: d.school_name, symbolSize: 22 }] : [],
|
||
symbolSize: 22, itemStyle: { color: COLORS.primary, borderColor: '#fff', borderWidth: 3 },
|
||
label: { show: true, formatter: d.school_name, position: 'top', textStyle: { fontSize: 13, fontWeight: 'bold', color: COLORS.primary } } },
|
||
],
|
||
};
|
||
chart.setOption(option);
|
||
}
|
||
window.addEventListener('resize', () => chart.resize());
|
||
});
|
||
</script>
|
||
<script>
|
||
// ===== A. 学校画像卡（仪表盘 + 红绿灯） =====
|
||
const profileData = {"cluster": "\u5f85\u63d0\u5347", "dim_signals": [{"avg_level": 2.3, "min_level": 1, "name": "\u8bfe\u7a0b\u9886\u5bfc\u529b", "rank": 13, "score": 49.96}, {"avg_level": 2.0, "min_level": 1, "name": "\u6559\u5b66\u53d8\u9769\u529b", "rank": 14, "score": 42.15}, {"avg_level": 2.5, "min_level": 1, "name": "\u5b66\u751f\u53d1\u5c55\u6307\u5bfc\u529b", "rank": 12, "score": 47.99}, {"avg_level": 1.0, "min_level": 1, "name": "\u6559\u5e08\u53d1\u5c55\u652f\u6301\u529b", "rank": 15, "score": 42.61}, {"avg_level": 1.8, "min_level": 1, "name": "\u6559\u80b2\u8d28\u91cf\u8bc4\u4f30\u529b", "rank": 15, "score": 42.0}, {"avg_level": 2.3, "min_level": 1, "name": "\u6559\u80b2\u6761\u4ef6\u4fdd\u969c\u529b", "rank": 11, "score": 47.7}, {"avg_level": 2.0, "min_level": 1, "name": "\u6570\u5b57\u5316\u8d4b\u80fd\u529b", "rank": 14, "score": 42.53}], "district_avg": 51.78, "level_counts": {"1": 9, "2": 5, "3": 4, "4": 2}, "rank": 15, "school_name": "\u4e0a\u5b9e\u5251\u6865", "school_type": "\u6c11\u529e\u9ad8\u4e2d", "total_schools": 15, "total_score": 44.99, "total_sub_dims": 20};
|
||
if (profileData && profileData.total_score) {
|
||
(function() {
|
||
const chart = echarts.init(document.getElementById('profile-card-chart'));
|
||
const score = profileData.total_score;
|
||
const districtAvg = profileData.district_avg;
|
||
const signals = profileData.dim_signals;
|
||
const levelCounts = profileData.level_counts;
|
||
|
||
// 信号灯颜色映射
|
||
const signalColor = function(minLevel) {
|
||
if (minLevel >= 4) return '#10b981';
|
||
if (minLevel >= 3) return '#3b82f6';
|
||
if (minLevel >= 2) return '#f59e0b';
|
||
return '#ef4444';
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
const option = {
|
||
title: [
|
||
{ text: profileData.school_name, left: 'center', top: 6, textStyle: { fontSize: 16, fontWeight: 'bold', color: '#1e3a5f' } },
|
||
{ text: profileData.school_type + ' · 区内第' + profileData.rank + '名', left: 'center', top: 28, textStyle: { fontSize: 11, color: '#6b7280' } },
|
||
],
|
||
series: [
|
||
// 中央仪表盘
|
||
{
|
||
type: 'gauge',
|
||
center: ['50%', '60%'],
|
||
radius: '55%',
|
||
startAngle: 210,
|
||
endAngle: -30,
|
||
min: 30,
|
||
max: 70,
|
||
splitNumber: 4,
|
||
itemStyle: { color: score >= districtAvg ? '#2563eb' : '#f59e0b' },
|
||
progress: { show: true, width: 18, roundCap: true },
|
||
pointer: { show: false },
|
||
axisLine: { lineStyle: { width: 18, color: [[0.25, '#fee2e2'], [0.5, '#fef3c7'], [0.75, '#dbeafe'], [1, '#d1fae5']] } },
|
||
axisTick: { show: false },
|
||
splitLine: { show: false },
|
||
axisLabel: { show: true, distance: 25, fontSize: 10, color: '#6b7280',
|
||
formatter: function(v) { return v.toFixed(0); } },
|
||
detail: {
|
||
valueAnimation: true, offsetCenter: [0, '-5%'],
|
||
fontSize: 36, fontWeight: 'bold', color: '#1e3a5f',
|
||
formatter: function(v) { return v.toFixed(1); },
|
||
},
|
||
data: [{ value: score }],
|
||
},
|
||
// 底部饼图：20个三级维度的水平分布
|
||
{
|
||
type: 'pie',
|
||
center: ['50%', '92%'],
|
||
radius: ['0%', '0%'], // 隐藏饼图，只用graphic展示
|
||
silent: true,
|
||
data: [],
|
||
},
|
||
],
|
||
graphic: (function() {
|
||
var items = [];
|
||
// 7个维度信号灯（底部横排）
|
||
var startX = 50 - (signals.length - 1) * 6;
|
||
signals.forEach(function(sig, i) {
|
||
var x = startX + i * 12;
|
||
// 圆点
|
||
items.push({
|
||
type: 'circle', shape: { cx: 0, cy: 0, r: 8 },
|
||
left: x + '%', top: '78%',
|
||
style: { fill: signalColor(sig.min_level), shadowBlur: 6, shadowColor: signalColor(sig.min_level) },
|
||
});
|
||
// 标签
|
||
items.push({
|
||
type: 'text',
|
||
left: x + '%', top: '84%',
|
||
style: {
|
||
text: sig.name.replace('力', ''),
|
||
textAlign: 'center', fontSize: 9, fill: '#374151',
|
||
},
|
||
});
|
||
});
|
||
// 水平分布摘要文字
|
||
var summaryText = '水平分布: ';
|
||
summaryText += 'Lv4=' + levelCounts[4] + ' Lv3=' + levelCounts[3] + ' Lv2=' + levelCounts[2] + ' Lv1=' + levelCounts[1];
|
||
items.push({
|
||
type: 'text',
|
||
left: 'center', top: '93%',
|
||
style: { text: summaryText, textAlign: 'center', fontSize: 10, fill: '#6b7280' },
|
||
});
|
||
return items;
|
||
})(),
|
||
};
|
||
chart.setOption(option);
|
||
window.addEventListener('resize', () => chart.resize());
|
||
})();
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// ===== B. 优势-短板象限图 =====
|
||
const quadrantData = {"items": [{"diff": 0.58, "level": 3, "name": "\u56fd\u5bb6\u6807\u51c6\u9075\u5faa", "parent": "\u8bfe\u7a0b\u9886\u5bfc\u529b", "score": 54.26}, {"diff": -11.35, "level": 1, "name": "\u8bfe\u7a0b\u7ed3\u6784\u5efa\u8bbe", "parent": "\u8bfe\u7a0b\u9886\u5bfc\u529b", "score": 43.96}, {"diff": -0.73, "level": 3, "name": "\u8bfe\u7a0b\u89c4\u8303\u843d\u5b9e", "parent": "\u8bfe\u7a0b\u9886\u5bfc\u529b", "score": 51.67}, {"diff": 1.59, "level": 3, "name": "\u6559\u5b66\u65b9\u5f0f\u53d8\u9769", "parent": "\u6559\u5b66\u53d8\u9769\u529b", "score": 50.78}, {"diff": -15.98, "level": 1, "name": "\u4f5c\u4e1a\u8bbe\u8ba1\u4e0e\u7ba1\u7406\u53d8\u9769", "parent": "\u6559\u5b66\u53d8\u9769\u529b", "score": 33.52}, {"diff": -17.36, "level": 1, "name": "\u5b66\u79d1\u53d1\u5c55\u7684\u4e2a\u6027\u5316\u8f85\u5bfc", "parent": "\u5b66\u751f\u53d1\u5c55\u6307\u5bfc\u529b", "score": 34.82}, {"diff": 9.76, "level": 4, "name": "\u5b66\u751f\u751f\u6daf\u53d1\u5c55\u6307\u5bfc", "parent": "\u5b66\u751f\u53d1\u5c55\u6307\u5bfc\u529b", "score": 61.16}, {"diff": -9.09, "level": 1, "name": "\u57f9\u8bad\u652f\u6301", "parent": "\u6559\u5e08\u53d1\u5c55\u652f\u6301\u529b", "score": 46.35}, {"diff": -7.45, "level": 1, "name": "\u6559\u7814\u652f\u6301", "parent": "\u6559\u5e08\u53d1\u5c55\u652f\u6301\u529b", "score": 39.09}, {"diff": -8.0, "level": 1, "name": "\u9879\u76ee\u652f\u6301", "parent": "\u6559\u5e08\u53d1\u5c55\u652f\u6301\u529b", "score": 42.4}, {"diff": -9.35, "level": 1, "name": "\u79d1\u5b66\u8bc4\u4ef7\u89c2", "parent": "\u6559\u80b2\u8d28\u91cf\u8bc4\u4f30\u529b", "score": 39.58}, {"diff": -11.95, "level": 2, "name": "\u5b66\u4e1a\u8d28\u91cf\u8bc4\u4f30", "parent": "\u6559\u80b2\u8d28\u91cf\u8bc4\u4f30\u529b", "score": 43.93}, {"diff": -12.37, "level": 2, "name": "\u7efc\u5408\u7d20\u8d28\u8bc4\u4f30", "parent": "\u6559\u80b2\u8d28\u91cf\u8bc4\u4f30\u529b", "score": 41.29}, {"diff": -10.45, "level": 2, "name": "\u5b9e\u8df5\u6d3b\u52a8\u8bc4\u4f30", "parent": "\u6559\u80b2\u8d28\u91cf\u8bc4\u4f30\u529b", "score": 43.19}, {"diff": 9.28, "level": 4, "name": "\u533a\u57df\u63a8\u8fdb", "parent": "\u6559\u80b2\u6761\u4ef6\u4fdd\u969c\u529b", "score": 60.54}, {"diff": -6.38, "level": 2, "name": "\u73af\u5883\u652f\u6301", "parent": "\u6559\u80b2\u6761\u4ef6\u4fdd\u969c\u529b", "score": 45.09}, {"diff": -15.76, "level": 1, "name": "\u8d44\u6e90\u652f\u6301", "parent": "\u6559\u80b2\u6761\u4ef6\u4fdd\u969c\u529b", "score": 37.47}, {"diff": -4.97, "level": 3, "name": "\u6559\u5b66\u65b9\u5f0f\u521b\u65b0", "parent": "\u6570\u5b57\u5316\u8d4b\u80fd\u529b", "score": 47.62}, {"diff": -7.58, "level": 2, "name": "\u8bc4\u4ef7\u7cbe\u51c6\u5316\u4e0e\u4e2a\u6027\u5316", "parent": "\u6570\u5b57\u5316\u8d4b\u80fd\u529b", "score": 41.06}, {"diff": -14.93, "level": 1, "name": "\u8bfe\u7a0b\u8fed\u4ee3\u4f18\u5316", "parent": "\u6570\u5b57\u5316\u8d4b\u80fd\u529b", "score": 38.9}], "school_name": "\u4e0a\u5b9e\u5251\u6865", "x_center": 50, "y_center": 0};
|
||
if (quadrantData && quadrantData.items && quadrantData.items.length > 0) {
|
||
(function() {
|
||
const chart = echarts.init(document.getElementById('quadrant-chart'));
|
||
const items = quadrantData.items;
|
||
|
||
// 颜色映射（按父维度）
|
||
const dimColors = {
|
||
'课程领导力': '#2563eb', '教学变革力': '#7c3aed', '学生发展指导力': '#059669',
|
||
'教师发展支持力': '#d97706', '教育质量评估力': '#dc2626',
|
||
'教育条件保障力': '#0891b2', '数字化赋能力': '#be185d',
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
const scatterData = items.map(function(item) {
|
||
return {
|
||
value: [item.score, item.diff],
|
||
name: item.name,
|
||
parent: item.parent,
|
||
level: item.level,
|
||
itemStyle: { color: dimColors[item.parent] || '#6b7280' },
|
||
};
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
const option = {
|
||
tooltip: {
|
||
formatter: function(p) {
|
||
var d = p.data;
|
||
return '<strong>' + d.name + '</strong> (' + d.parent + ')<br/>' +
|
||
'得分: ' + d.value[0] + '分<br/>' +
|
||
'差异: ' + (d.value[1] > 0 ? '+' : '') + d.value[1] + '分<br/>' +
|
||
'水平: ' + d.level;
|
||
}
|
||
},
|
||
grid: { left: '12%', right: '5%', bottom: '12%', top: '8%' },
|
||
xAxis: {
|
||
name: '得分', nameLocation: 'center', nameGap: 28,
|
||
nameTextStyle: { fontSize: 12 },
|
||
min: 20, max: 80,
|
||
splitLine: { show: true, lineStyle: { type: 'dashed', color: '#e5e7eb' } },
|
||
},
|
||
yAxis: {
|
||
name: '与区均值差异', nameLocation: 'center', nameGap: 40,
|
||
nameTextStyle: { fontSize: 12 },
|
||
splitLine: { show: true, lineStyle: { type: 'dashed', color: '#e5e7eb' } },
|
||
},
|
||
series: [{
|
||
type: 'scatter',
|
||
data: scatterData,
|
||
symbolSize: function(val, params) { return Math.abs(val[1]) * 1.5 + 10; },
|
||
label: {
|
||
show: true, position: 'right', fontSize: 9,
|
||
formatter: function(p) {
|
||
var n = p.data.name;
|
||
return n.length > 5 ? n.substring(0, 5) + '…' : n;
|
||
},
|
||
color: '#374151',
|
||
},
|
||
}],
|
||
// 象限标注
|
||
graphic: [
|
||
// 均值十字线
|
||
{ type: 'line', shape: { x1: 0, y1: 0, x2: 0, y2: 0 }, silent: true },
|
||
// 象限标签
|
||
{ type: 'text', right: '8%', top: '10%',
|
||
style: { text: '✦ 核心优势', fill: '#059669', fontSize: 11, fontWeight: 'bold' } },
|
||
{ type: 'text', left: '14%', bottom: '14%',
|
||
style: { text: '⚠ 急需改进', fill: '#dc2626', fontSize: 11, fontWeight: 'bold' } },
|
||
{ type: 'text', right: '8%', bottom: '14%',
|
||
style: { text: '⊙ 隐性风险', fill: '#d97706', fontSize: 11, fontWeight: 'bold' } },
|
||
{ type: 'text', left: '14%', top: '10%',
|
||
style: { text: '↗ 潜力项', fill: '#2563eb', fontSize: 11, fontWeight: 'bold' } },
|
||
],
|
||
// 均值参考线
|
||
markLine: {},
|
||
};
|
||
// 加十字参考线
|
||
option.series[0].markLine = {
|
||
silent: true, symbol: 'none',
|
||
lineStyle: { color: '#9ca3af', type: 'dashed', width: 1 },
|
||
data: [
|
||
{ xAxis: 50, label: { formatter: '区均值', fontSize: 10, position: 'start' } },
|
||
{ yAxis: 0, label: { show: false } },
|
||
],
|
||
};
|
||
chart.setOption(option);
|
||
window.addEventListener('resize', () => chart.resize());
|
||
})();
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// ===== C. 温度计条形图 =====
|
||
const thermoData = {"data": {"\u4f5c\u4e1a\u8bbe\u8ba1\u4e0e\u7ba1\u7406\u53d8\u9769": {"district_avg": 49.5, "level": 1, "same_type_avg": 49.5, "score": 33.52, "thresholds": {"level2": 45, "level3": 49, "level4": 54}}, "\u533a\u57df\u63a8\u8fdb": {"district_avg": 51.26, "level": 4, "same_type_avg": 51.26, "score": 60.54, "thresholds": {"level2": 40, "level3": 52, "level4": 59}}, "\u56fd\u5bb6\u6807\u51c6\u9075\u5faa": {"district_avg": 53.68, "level": 3, "same_type_avg": 53.68, "score": 54.26, "thresholds": {"level2": 43, "level3": 53.5, "level4": 57}}, "\u57f9\u8bad\u652f\u6301": {"district_avg": 55.44, "level": 1, "same_type_avg": 55.44, "score": 46.35, "thresholds": {"level2": 47.5, "level3": 49, "level4": 51}}, "\u5b66\u4e1a\u8d28\u91cf\u8bc4\u4f30": {"district_avg": 55.88, "level": 2, "same_type_avg": 55.88, "score": 43.93, "thresholds": {"level2": 41, "level3": 46, "level4": 54}}, "\u5b66\u751f\u751f\u6daf\u53d1\u5c55\u6307\u5bfc": {"district_avg": 51.4, "level": 4, "same_type_avg": 51.4, "score": 61.16, "thresholds": {"level2": 42, "level3": 50, "level4": 56}}, "\u5b66\u79d1\u53d1\u5c55\u7684\u4e2a\u6027\u5316\u8f85\u5bfc": {"district_avg": 52.18, "level": 1, "same_type_avg": 52.18, "score": 34.82, "thresholds": {"level2": 46, "level3": 50, "level4": 60}}, "\u5b9e\u8df5\u6d3b\u52a8\u8bc4\u4f30": {"district_avg": 53.65, "level": 2, "same_type_avg": 53.65, "score": 43.19, "thresholds": {"level2": 43, "level3": 46.5, "level4": 50}}, "\u6559\u5b66\u65b9\u5f0f\u521b\u65b0": {"district_avg": 52.59, "level": 3, "same_type_avg": 52.59, "score": 47.62, "thresholds": {"level2": 40, "level3": 45, "level4": 54}}, "\u6559\u5b66\u65b9\u5f0f\u53d8\u9769": {"district_avg": 49.19, "level": 3, "same_type_avg": 49.19, "score": 50.78, "thresholds": {"level2": 45, "level3": 49, "level4": 54}}, "\u6559\u7814\u652f\u6301": {"district_avg": 46.54, "level": 1, "same_type_avg": 46.54, "score": 39.09, "thresholds": {"level2": 47, "level3": 50, "level4": 55}}, "\u73af\u5883\u652f\u6301": {"district_avg": 51.47, "level": 2, "same_type_avg": 51.47, "score": 45.09, "thresholds": {"level2": 41, "level3": 49.5, "level4": 56}}, "\u79d1\u5b66\u8bc4\u4ef7\u89c2": {"district_avg": 48.93, "level": 1, "same_type_avg": 48.93, "score": 39.58, "thresholds": {"level2": 43, "level3": 50, "level4": 57}}, "\u7efc\u5408\u7d20\u8d28\u8bc4\u4f30": {"district_avg": 53.66, "level": 2, "same_type_avg": 53.66, "score": 41.29, "thresholds": {"level2": 39, "level3": 50, "level4": 58.5}}, "\u8bc4\u4ef7\u7cbe\u51c6\u5316\u4e0e\u4e2a\u6027\u5316": {"district_avg": 48.64, "level": 2, "same_type_avg": 48.64, "score": 41.06, "thresholds": {"level2": 40, "level3": 50, "level4": 60}}, "\u8bfe\u7a0b\u7ed3\u6784\u5efa\u8bbe": {"district_avg": 55.31, "level": 1, "same_type_avg": 55.31, "score": 43.96, "thresholds": {"level2": 45, "level3": 49, "level4": 55.5}}, "\u8bfe\u7a0b\u89c4\u8303\u843d\u5b9e": {"district_avg": 52.41, "level": 3, "same_type_avg": 52.41, "score": 51.67, "thresholds": {"level2": 44, "level3": 50, "level4": 58}}, "\u8bfe\u7a0b\u8fed\u4ee3\u4f18\u5316": {"district_avg": 53.83, "level": 1, "same_type_avg": 53.83, "score": 38.9, "thresholds": {"level2": 45, "level3": 50, "level4": 55}}, "\u8d44\u6e90\u652f\u6301": {"district_avg": 53.24, "level": 1, "same_type_avg": 53.24, "score": 37.47, "thresholds": {"level2": 42, "level3": 49, "level4": 57.5}}, "\u9879\u76ee\u652f\u6301": {"district_avg": 50.4, "level": 1, "same_type_avg": 50.4, "score": 42.4, "thresholds": {"level2": 44, "level3": 50, "level4": 56.5}}}, "school_name": "\u4e0a\u5b9e\u5251\u6865"};
|
||
if (thermoData && thermoData.data) {
|
||
(function() {
|
||
// 为每个 thermo-{partId}-{subIndex} 容器渲染
|
||
Object.keys(thermoData.data).forEach(function(sdName) {
|
||
var d = thermoData.data[sdName];
|
||
// 查找匹配的容器（遍历所有 thermo- 开头的元素）
|
||
var allThermos = document.querySelectorAll('[id^="thermo-"]');
|
||
allThermos.forEach(function(el) {
|
||
if (el.getAttribute('data-rendered')) return;
|
||
// 找到未渲染的容器，按顺序匹配
|
||
});
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
// 用更简单的方式：直接在维度渲染时按 partId 和 subIndex 匹配
|
||
var partSubMap = {};
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
partSubMap['part3-1'] = '国家标准遵循';
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
partSubMap['part3-2'] = '课程结构建设';
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
partSubMap['part3-3'] = '课程规范落实';
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
partSubMap['part4-1'] = '教学方式变革';
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
partSubMap['part4-2'] = '作业设计与管理变革';
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
partSubMap['part5-1'] = '学科发展的个性化辅导';
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
partSubMap['part5-2'] = '学生生涯发展指导';
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
partSubMap['part6-1'] = '培训支持';
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
partSubMap['part6-2'] = '教研支持';
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
partSubMap['part6-3'] = '项目支持';
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
partSubMap['part7-1'] = '科学评价观';
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
partSubMap['part7-2'] = '学业质量评估';
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
partSubMap['part7-3'] = '综合素质评估';
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
partSubMap['part7-4'] = '实践活动评估';
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
partSubMap['part8-1'] = '区域推进';
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
partSubMap['part8-2'] = '环境支持';
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
partSubMap['part8-3'] = '资源支持';
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
partSubMap['part9-1'] = '教学方式创新';
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
partSubMap['part9-2'] = '评价精准化与个性化';
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
partSubMap['part9-3'] = '课程迭代优化';
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Object.keys(partSubMap).forEach(function(key) {
|
||
var sdName = partSubMap[key];
|
||
var d = thermoData.data[sdName];
|
||
if (!d) return;
|
||
var el = document.getElementById('thermo-' + key);
|
||
if (!el) return;
|
||
|
||
var chart = echarts.init(el);
|
||
var score = d.score;
|
||
var distAvg = d.district_avg;
|
||
var sameTypeAvg = d.same_type_avg;
|
||
var th = d.thresholds;
|
||
|
||
var option = {
|
||
grid: { left: '3%', right: '3%', top: '25%', bottom: '25%' },
|
||
xAxis: {
|
||
type: 'value', min: 20, max: 80,
|
||
axisLabel: { show: false },
|
||
axisTick: { show: false },
|
||
axisLine: { show: false },
|
||
splitLine: { show: false },
|
||
},
|
||
yAxis: {
|
||
type: 'category', data: [''],
|
||
axisLabel: { show: false },
|
||
axisTick: { show: false },
|
||
axisLine: { show: false },
|
||
},
|
||
series: [
|
||
// 背景条（水平区间着色：低分端=水平四红色 → 高分端=水平一绿色）
|
||
{ type: 'bar', data: [th.level2 - 20], stack: 'bg', barWidth: '60%',
|
||
itemStyle: { color: '#fee2e2', borderRadius: [4, 0, 0, 4] }, silent: true },
|
||
{ type: 'bar', data: [th.level3 - th.level2], stack: 'bg', barWidth: '60%',
|
||
itemStyle: { color: '#fef3c7' }, silent: true },
|
||
{ type: 'bar', data: [th.level4 - th.level3], stack: 'bg', barWidth: '60%',
|
||
itemStyle: { color: '#dbeafe' }, silent: true },
|
||
{ type: 'bar', data: [80 - th.level4], stack: 'bg', barWidth: '60%',
|
||
itemStyle: { color: '#d1fae5', borderRadius: [0, 4, 4, 0] }, silent: true },
|
||
],
|
||
// 指针标注
|
||
graphic: (function() {
|
||
var items = [];
|
||
var toPercent = function(val) { return ((val - 20) / 60 * 94 + 3) + '%'; };
|
||
// 本校得分指针（三角形 + 标签）
|
||
items.push({
|
||
type: 'text', left: toPercent(score), top: '2%',
|
||
style: { text: '▼ ' + score, textAlign: 'center', fontSize: 11, fontWeight: 'bold',
|
||
fill: '#1e3a5f' },
|
||
});
|
||
// 区均值指针
|
||
items.push({
|
||
type: 'text', left: toPercent(distAvg), bottom: '0%',
|
||
style: { text: '▲区均', textAlign: 'center', fontSize: 9, fill: '#6b7280' },
|
||
});
|
||
// 同类学校均值指针
|
||
if (Math.abs(sameTypeAvg - distAvg) > 1) {
|
||
items.push({
|
||
type: 'text', left: toPercent(sameTypeAvg), bottom: '0%',
|
||
style: { text: '▲同类', textAlign: 'center', fontSize: 9, fill: '#d97706' },
|
||
});
|
||
}
|
||
return items;
|
||
})(),
|
||
};
|
||
chart.setOption(option);
|
||
window.addEventListener('resize', () => chart.resize());
|
||
});
|
||
})();
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// ===== D. 进步空间瀑布图 =====
|
||
const waterfallData = {"current_total": 44.99, "improvements": [{"current_level": 1, "current_score": 33.52, "gap": 15.48, "name": "\u4f5c\u4e1a\u8bbe\u8ba1\u4e0e\u7ba1\u7406\u53d8\u9769", "parent": "\u6559\u5b66\u53d8\u9769\u529b", "target_score": 49}, {"current_level": 1, "current_score": 34.82, "gap": 15.18, "name": "\u5b66\u79d1\u53d1\u5c55\u7684\u4e2a\u6027\u5316\u8f85\u5bfc", "parent": "\u5b66\u751f\u53d1\u5c55\u6307\u5bfc\u529b", "target_score": 50}, {"current_level": 1, "current_score": 37.47, "gap": 11.53, "name": "\u8d44\u6e90\u652f\u6301", "parent": "\u6559\u80b2\u6761\u4ef6\u4fdd\u969c\u529b", "target_score": 49}, {"current_level": 1, "current_score": 38.9, "gap": 11.1, "name": "\u8bfe\u7a0b\u8fed\u4ee3\u4f18\u5316", "parent": "\u6570\u5b57\u5316\u8d4b\u80fd\u529b", "target_score": 50}, {"current_level": 1, "current_score": 39.09, "gap": 10.91, "name": "\u6559\u7814\u652f\u6301", "parent": "\u6559\u5e08\u53d1\u5c55\u652f\u6301\u529b", "target_score": 50}, {"current_level": 1, "current_score": 39.58, "gap": 10.42, "name": "\u79d1\u5b66\u8bc4\u4ef7\u89c2", "parent": "\u6559\u80b2\u8d28\u91cf\u8bc4\u4f30\u529b", "target_score": 50}, {"current_level": 2, "current_score": 41.06, "gap": 8.94, "name": "\u8bc4\u4ef7\u7cbe\u51c6\u5316\u4e0e\u4e2a\u6027\u5316", "parent": "\u6570\u5b57\u5316\u8d4b\u80fd\u529b", "target_score": 50}, {"current_level": 2, "current_score": 41.29, "gap": 8.71, "name": "\u7efc\u5408\u7d20\u8d28\u8bc4\u4f30", "parent": "\u6559\u80b2\u8d28\u91cf\u8bc4\u4f30\u529b", "target_score": 50}, {"current_level": 1, "current_score": 42.4, "gap": 7.6, "name": "\u9879\u76ee\u652f\u6301", "parent": "\u6559\u5e08\u53d1\u5c55\u652f\u6301\u529b", "target_score": 50}, {"current_level": 1, "current_score": 43.96, "gap": 5.04, "name": "\u8bfe\u7a0b\u7ed3\u6784\u5efa\u8bbe", "parent": "\u8bfe\u7a0b\u9886\u5bfc\u529b", "target_score": 49}, {"current_level": 2, "current_score": 45.09, "gap": 4.41, "name": "\u73af\u5883\u652f\u6301", "parent": "\u6559\u80b2\u6761\u4ef6\u4fdd\u969c\u529b", "target_score": 49.5}, {"current_level": 2, "current_score": 43.19, "gap": 3.31, "name": "\u5b9e\u8df5\u6d3b\u52a8\u8bc4\u4f30", "parent": "\u6559\u80b2\u8d28\u91cf\u8bc4\u4f30\u529b", "target_score": 46.5}, {"current_level": 1, "current_score": 46.35, "gap": 2.65, "name": "\u57f9\u8bad\u652f\u6301", "parent": "\u6559\u5e08\u53d1\u5c55\u652f\u6301\u529b", "target_score": 49}, {"current_level": 2, "current_score": 43.93, "gap": 2.07, "name": "\u5b66\u4e1a\u8d28\u91cf\u8bc4\u4f30", "parent": "\u6559\u80b2\u8d28\u91cf\u8bc4\u4f30\u529b", "target_score": 46}], "potential_total": 50.86, "school_name": "\u4e0a\u5b9e\u5251\u6865", "steps": [{"name": "\u5f53\u524d\u603b\u5206", "type": "current", "value": 44.99}, {"detail": "\u4ece\u6c34\u5e731\u2192\u6c34\u5e733 (+15.48\u5206)", "name": "\u4f5c\u4e1a\u8bbe\u8ba1\u4e0e\u7ba1\u7406\u53d8\u9769", "type": "gain", "value": 0.77}, {"detail": "\u4ece\u6c34\u5e731\u2192\u6c34\u5e733 (+15.18\u5206)", "name": "\u5b66\u79d1\u53d1\u5c55\u7684\u4e2a\u6027\u5316\u8f85\u5bfc", "type": "gain", "value": 0.76}, {"detail": "\u4ece\u6c34\u5e731\u2192\u6c34\u5e733 (+11.53\u5206)", "name": "\u8d44\u6e90\u652f\u6301", "type": "gain", "value": 0.58}, {"detail": "\u4ece\u6c34\u5e731\u2192\u6c34\u5e733 (+11.1\u5206)", "name": "\u8bfe\u7a0b\u8fed\u4ee3\u4f18\u5316", "type": "gain", "value": 0.55}, {"detail": "\u4ece\u6c34\u5e731\u2192\u6c34\u5e733 (+10.91\u5206)", "name": "\u6559\u7814\u652f\u6301", "type": "gain", "value": 0.55}, {"detail": "\u4ece\u6c34\u5e731\u2192\u6c34\u5e733 (+10.42\u5206)", "name": "\u79d1\u5b66\u8bc4\u4ef7\u89c2", "type": "gain", "value": 0.52}, {"detail": "\u4ece\u6c34\u5e732\u2192\u6c34\u5e733 (+8.94\u5206)", "name": "\u8bc4\u4ef7\u7cbe\u51c6\u5316\u4e0e\u4e2a\u6027\u5316", "type": "gain", "value": 0.45}, {"detail": "\u4ece\u6c34\u5e732\u2192\u6c34\u5e733 (+8.71\u5206)", "name": "\u7efc\u5408\u7d20\u8d28\u8bc4\u4f30", "type": "gain", "value": 0.44}, {"detail": "\u4ece\u6c34\u5e731\u2192\u6c34\u5e733 (+7.6\u5206)", "name": "\u9879\u76ee\u652f\u6301", "type": "gain", "value": 0.38}, {"detail": "\u4ece\u6c34\u5e731\u2192\u6c34\u5e733 (+5.04\u5206)", "name": "\u8bfe\u7a0b\u7ed3\u6784\u5efa\u8bbe", "type": "gain", "value": 0.25}, {"detail": "\u4ece\u6c34\u5e732\u2192\u6c34\u5e733 (+4.41\u5206)", "name": "\u73af\u5883\u652f\u6301", "type": "gain", "value": 0.22}, {"detail": "\u4ece\u6c34\u5e732\u2192\u6c34\u5e733 (+3.31\u5206)", "name": "\u5b9e\u8df5\u6d3b\u52a8\u8bc4\u4f30", "type": "gain", "value": 0.17}, {"detail": "\u4ece\u6c34\u5e731\u2192\u6c34\u5e733 (+2.65\u5206)", "name": "\u57f9\u8bad\u652f\u6301", "type": "gain", "value": 0.13}, {"detail": "\u4ece\u6c34\u5e732\u2192\u6c34\u5e733 (+2.07\u5206)", "name": "\u5b66\u4e1a\u8d28\u91cf\u8bc4\u4f30", "type": "gain", "value": 0.1}, {"name": "\u6f5c\u5728\u603b\u5206", "type": "potential", "value": 50.86}], "total_gain": 5.87};
|
||
if (waterfallData && waterfallData.steps && waterfallData.steps.length > 1) {
|
||
(function() {
|
||
var el = document.getElementById('waterfall-chart');
|
||
if (!el) return;
|
||
var chart = echarts.init(el);
|
||
var steps = waterfallData.steps;
|
||
|
||
var categories = [];
|
||
var baseData = []; // 透明基底
|
||
var gainData = []; // 增长部分
|
||
var totalData = []; // 起止柱
|
||
|
||
var runningBase = 0;
|
||
steps.forEach(function(step, i) {
|
||
var shortName = step.name.length > 6 ? step.name.substring(0, 6) + '…' : step.name;
|
||
categories.push(shortName);
|
||
|
||
if (step.type === 'current') {
|
||
baseData.push(0);
|
||
gainData.push(0);
|
||
totalData.push(step.value);
|
||
runningBase = step.value;
|
||
} else if (step.type === 'gain') {
|
||
baseData.push(runningBase);
|
||
gainData.push(step.value);
|
||
totalData.push(0);
|
||
runningBase += step.value;
|
||
} else if (step.type === 'potential') {
|
||
baseData.push(0);
|
||
gainData.push(0);
|
||
totalData.push(step.value);
|
||
}
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
var option = {
|
||
tooltip: {
|
||
trigger: 'axis', axisPointer: { type: 'shadow' },
|
||
formatter: function(params) {
|
||
var idx = params[0].dataIndex;
|
||
var step = steps[idx];
|
||
if (step.type === 'current') return '当前总分: <strong>' + step.value + '</strong>分';
|
||
if (step.type === 'potential') return '潜在总分: <strong>' + step.value + '</strong>分 (+' + waterfallData.total_gain + ')';
|
||
return '<strong>' + step.name + '</strong><br/>' +
|
||
(step.detail || '') + '<br/>预估总分贡献: +' + step.value + '分';
|
||
},
|
||
},
|
||
grid: { left: '5%', right: '5%', bottom: '18%', top: '8%', containLabel: true },
|
||
xAxis: {
|
||
type: 'category', data: categories,
|
||
axisLabel: { fontSize: 10, rotate: 20 },
|
||
},
|
||
yAxis: {
|
||
type: 'value',
|
||
min: Math.floor(waterfallData.current_total - 2),
|
||
max: Math.ceil(waterfallData.potential_total + 2),
|
||
axisLabel: { fontSize: 11 },
|
||
},
|
||
series: [
|
||
// 透明基底
|
||
{
|
||
type: 'bar', stack: 'waterfall', data: baseData,
|
||
itemStyle: { color: 'transparent' }, barWidth: '45%',
|
||
emphasis: { itemStyle: { color: 'transparent' } },
|
||
},
|
||
// 增长部分（绿色）
|
||
{
|
||
type: 'bar', stack: 'waterfall', data: gainData,
|
||
itemStyle: { color: '#10b981', borderRadius: [4, 4, 0, 0] },
|
||
barWidth: '45%',
|
||
label: {
|
||
show: true, position: 'top', fontSize: 10, color: '#059669',
|
||
formatter: function(p) { return p.value > 0 ? '+' + p.value.toFixed(2) : ''; },
|
||
},
|
||
},
|
||
// 起止柱（蓝色）
|
||
{
|
||
type: 'bar', data: totalData,
|
||
itemStyle: {
|
||
color: function(p) {
|
||
return p.dataIndex === 0 ? '#2563eb' : '#0891b2';
|
||
},
|
||
borderRadius: [4, 4, 0, 0],
|
||
},
|
||
barWidth: '45%',
|
||
label: {
|
||
show: true, position: 'top', fontSize: 12, fontWeight: 'bold',
|
||
color: '#1e3a5f',
|
||
formatter: function(p) { return p.value > 0 ? p.value.toFixed(1) : ''; },
|
||
},
|
||
},
|
||
],
|
||
};
|
||
chart.setOption(option);
|
||
window.addEventListener('resize', () => chart.resize());
|
||
})();
|
||
}
|
||
</script>
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
<script>
|
||
(function() {
|
||
/* ---- 1. 自动扫描 h1/h2 生成 TOC ---- */
|
||
var track = document.getElementById('toc-track');
|
||
var container = document.querySelector('.report-container');
|
||
// 取 .section 内的 h1（部分标题）和 h2[id]（子维度标题）
|
||
var headings = container.querySelectorAll('.section > h1, h2[id]');
|
||
var currentGroup = null;
|
||
|
||
headings.forEach(function(h) {
|
||
// 确保有 id 可跳转；h1 取父 .section 的 id，h2 自身有 id
|
||
var id = '';
|
||
if (h.tagName === 'H1') {
|
||
var sec = h.closest('.section');
|
||
id = sec ? sec.id : '';
|
||
} else {
|
||
id = h.id;
|
||
}
|
||
if (!id) return;
|
||
|
||
var a = document.createElement('a');
|
||
a.href = '#' + id;
|
||
a.className = 'toc-item';
|
||
// 去掉"第X部分 "前缀，只保留核心文字
|
||
var text = h.textContent.replace(/^第[一二三四五六七八九十]+部分\s*/, '');
|
||
// h2 也去掉"二、""三、"等编号前缀
|
||
text = text.replace(/^[一二三四五六七八九十]+、\s*/, '');
|
||
a.textContent = text;
|
||
|
||
if (h.tagName === 'H1') {
|
||
a.classList.add('level-1');
|
||
a.setAttribute('data-group', id);
|
||
currentGroup = id;
|
||
} else {
|
||
a.classList.add('level-2');
|
||
if (currentGroup) a.setAttribute('data-parent', currentGroup);
|
||
}
|
||
track.appendChild(a);
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
/* ---- 2. 事件绑定 ---- */
|
||
var tocItems = track.querySelectorAll('.toc-item');
|
||
var level2Items = track.querySelectorAll('.toc-item.level-2');
|
||
var sections = [];
|
||
|
||
tocItems.forEach(function(item) {
|
||
var target = document.getElementById(item.getAttribute('href').slice(1));
|
||
if (target) sections.push({ el: target, link: item });
|
||
|
||
// 点击平滑滚动
|
||
item.addEventListener('click', function(e) {
|
||
e.preventDefault();
|
||
target && target.scrollIntoView({ behavior: 'smooth', block: 'start' });
|
||
if (window.innerWidth <= 1280) {
|
||
document.getElementById('toc-nav').classList.remove('show');
|
||
}
|
||
});
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
function expandGroup(gid) {
|
||
level2Items.forEach(function(item) {
|
||
item.classList.toggle('visible', item.getAttribute('data-parent') === gid);
|
||
});
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/* ---- 3. 滚动高亮 ---- */
|
||
var ticking = false;
|
||
window.addEventListener('scroll', function() {
|
||
if (ticking) return;
|
||
ticking = true;
|
||
window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {
|
||
var scrollY = window.scrollY + 150;
|
||
var current = null;
|
||
for (var i = sections.length - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
|
||
if (sections[i].el.offsetTop <= scrollY) { current = sections[i]; break; }
|
||
}
|
||
tocItems.forEach(function(item) { item.classList.remove('active'); });
|
||
if (current) {
|
||
current.link.classList.add('active');
|
||
expandGroup(current.link.getAttribute('data-group') || current.link.getAttribute('data-parent') || '');
|
||
}
|
||
ticking = false;
|
||
});
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
window.dispatchEvent(new Event('scroll'));
|
||
})();
|
||
</script>
|
||
|
||
</body>
|
||
</html> |