Files
goodbuddy/AGENTS.md
T
mesalogo 104ac2aec1
Deploy website to GitHub Pages / Deploy static website (push) Waiting to run
Cross-platform packages / macos arm64 (push) Blocked by required conditions
Cross-platform packages / windows arm64 (push) Blocked by required conditions
Cross-platform packages / linux x64 (push) Blocked by required conditions
Cross-platform packages / macos x64 (push) Blocked by required conditions
Cross-platform packages / windows x64 (push) Blocked by required conditions
Cross-platform packages / Publish GitHub and OSS release (push) Blocked by required conditions
Cross-platform packages / Validate source (push) Waiting to run
Cross-platform packages / linux arm64 (push) Blocked by required conditions
chore: release GoodBuddy 0.11.0
Prepare the approved bilingual 0.11.0 release metadata and synchronize package versions. macOS packaging now signs and notarizes when all Apple credentials are available, emits unsigned packages when none are configured, and rejects partial credential sets so the six-platform release can proceed without silently misrepresenting signing status.
2026-08-20 13:20:50 +08:00

361 lines
19 KiB
Markdown

# GoodBuddy Agent Guide
## Scope
These instructions apply to the entire repository.
GoodBuddy is a secure, cross-platform Electron desktop assistant. It uses
Electron, React, TypeScript, Vite, Vitest, and SQLite. User-facing copy is
primarily Simplified Chinese.
## Architecture
- `src/main`: privileged Electron main process, runtimes, persistence, IPC,
knowledge, automation, and OS integration.
- `src/preload`: the narrow, typed bridge exposed to the renderer.
- `src/shared`: schemas, contracts, presets, and IPC channel definitions shared
across process boundaries.
- `resources/skills`: bundled skills.
- `build`: packaging scripts and icons.
- `out` and `dist`: generated output. Change source files instead.
Keep Electron security boundaries intact:
- Preserve context isolation and sandboxing.
- Never enable renderer Node integration.
- Validate IPC input with shared Zod schemas and verify trusted senders.
- Expose only explicit preload methods. Do not pass raw Electron APIs.
- Keep API keys in the main process and encrypted settings store.
## Runtime Behavior
- Ask mode must remain read-only at the runtime boundary.
- Execute mode may use tools only through the existing approval controls.
- Preserve cancellation, timeout, bounded-output, and shutdown behavior.
- Treat OpenCode and Continue as untrusted child runtimes. Preserve environment
allowlists, sandbox checks, and per-tool approval enforcement.
- A successful image-model configuration check does not prove generation works.
Only an actual generation request verifies the provider path.
- Do not fetch provider-returned image URLs. Accept and validate bounded inline
image data, then persist it as an artifact in the main process.
## Data and Compatibility
- Preserve existing user data and migrations.
- Do not weaken SQLite transaction, lifecycle, deduplication, or cleanup logic.
- Treat user workspaces and untracked files as user-owned.
- Keep Windows, macOS, Linux x64, and Linux arm64 behavior in mind.
- Do not hard-code machine-specific paths, credentials, or provider endpoints.
## Implementation Conventions
- Follow surrounding TypeScript and React patterns.
- Reuse installed libraries and shared contracts before adding dependencies.
- Keep changes focused. Do not add unrelated refactors or documentation.
- Add or update focused tests for behavioral changes and regressions.
- After completing any functional change, inspect the affected product,
architecture, design, feature, setup, and operational documentation and
update every relevant document to match the implemented behavior. Treat the
final code and validated runtime behavior as the source of truth: correct
stale documentation rather than preserving outdated intent. Avoid
documentation churn only when the change has no documented impact.
- Avoid broad catches that erase HTTP status, cancellation, or provider error
context.
- Keep UI accessible with labels, keyboard behavior, semantic roles, and visible
focus states.
## UI Consistency
- Treat `UI-DESIGN.md` as the canonical UI design system. Read and follow it
before changing renderer layout, shared controls, interaction feedback,
themes, responsive behavior, or accessibility semantics.
- Reuse the shared `PageTabs` and `SegmentedControl` primitives instead of
creating page-specific tab or toggle styles. A semantic tab set may use the
shared segmented visual variant, but it must retain `tablist`, `tab`,
`tabpanel`, `aria-selected`, roving focus, and arrow-key behavior.
- Use the shared sliding Switch pattern for persistent binary states and expose
`role="switch"` even when it is implemented with a checkbox input. Keep
Checkbox visuals and semantics for multi-select, assignment, and explicit
confirmation. Do not create page-specific Switch styling.
- Use the bundled `Inter Variable` and `Noto Sans SC Variable` UI fonts through
the shared typography tokens. Do not add remote font requests or page-local
font stacks. Keep redistributed font licenses in packaged resources and
retain system fallbacks for startup and unsupported glyphs.
- Route transient success and informational feedback, plus asynchronous errors
that are not tied to one field, through the application notification
viewport. Do not render page-local copies of the same notification pattern.
- Keep inline feedback only when it must remain attached to its context, such
as field validation, destructive confirmation, operation progress, a
blocking page state, or an error with an immediate local recovery action.
- Do not show the same event both inline and as an application notification.
Preserve user input and actionable error context when an operation fails.
## Commit Messages and Release Notes
Release notes are derived in part from commit history, so commits for
user-visible changes must record product intent rather than only the
implementation mechanism.
- Classify the commit by the user-visible behavior. Use `feat` only for a
capability users did not previously have. Use `fix` when restoring intended
behavior, removing inconsistency, or making two existing entry points reflect
the same underlying setting, even if the implementation adds new
synchronization logic.
- Keep the subject concise, then add a commit body for non-trivial user-visible
changes. State the previous user-facing problem, the resulting behavior, and
the affected surface or workflow. Include permissions, migration,
compatibility, cost, data, preview-status, or other usage caveats when
relevant.
- Describe the user outcome precisely. Do not promote an internal refactor,
synchronization mechanism, schema change, or newly added implementation code
to a product feature unless it creates a genuinely new user capability.
- When a change is release-note worthy, include a short `Release note:` line in
the commit body written in user-facing language. Prefer a concrete usage
scenario and benefit over technical implementation terminology.
- Treat commit messages as evidence, not as the sole source of truth. Before
drafting release notes, verify the diff and resulting behavior, correct any
inaccurate `feat` or `fix` classification, and include actionable usage
notes where the change affects defaults, synchronized settings, permissions,
resource usage, compatibility, or user data.
Example:
```text
fix: unify project settings across channel entry points
The top-left project settings and the project settings shown under messaging
channels could present or save inconsistent values. They now edit the same
project configuration for the project name, description, Runtime, and work
mode.
Release note: 修复左上角项目设置与消息通道项目设置不一致的问题;现在从任一入口修改后,另一处会同步显示相同配置。
```
## Release Packaging
- `.github/workflows/packages.yml` is the canonical cross-platform packaging
workflow. It validates and builds `out` once, then packages on six native
runners: Windows, macOS, and Linux, each for x64 and arm64.
- Run the unified packager with
`npm run release:package -- --platform <platform> --arch <arch>`. It only
packages for the native host and writes to
`dist/release/<platform>-<arch>`.
- Default deliverables are NSIS and portable ZIP for Windows, DMG and ZIP for
macOS, and AppImage and DEB for Linux. Every target includes
`release-manifest.json` with SHA-256 hashes.
- `build/build-release.cjs` verifies the unpacked application, `app.asar`,
bundled Continue and OpenCode runtimes, executable architecture, and package
signatures before atomically replacing a release directory.
- Keep electron-builder invocations on `--publish never`. Main-branch builds
run validation and build the production bundle without running the native
package matrix. Manual builds upload 30-day GitHub Actions artifacts.
Version-tag builds verify and aggregate packages before publishing GitHub
Release assets. The macOS jobs sign, notarize, and verify packages when all
five Apple credentials are configured. With no Apple credentials they must
use the explicit `--unsigned` path, warn that Gatekeeper may block the
packages, and still complete; a partial credential set must fail rather than
silently downgrade.
- Keep `ELECTRON_CACHE` and `ELECTRON_BUILDER_CACHE` under
`${{ runner.temp }}` in step-level workflow contexts. A cache beneath the
repository inherits the root `"type": "module"` and breaks electron-builder's
CommonJS macOS icon tool.
- Tag builds must use `v${package.version}`. The workflow also supports manual
dispatch and main-branch changes to release tooling.
### Tagged Release Process
Every version-tag release must follow this sequence. A branch-only push does
not require release notes.
1. Confirm that the user wants a release tag and identify the exact release
commit and the new `package.json` version.
2. Find the latest stable version tag reachable before the release commit and
inspect the complete commit and file diff from that tag to the release
commit. For the first tagged release, inspect the relevant repository
history instead.
3. Draft concise, user-facing release notes in both Simplified Chinese and
English based only on verified changes in that range. Use the titles
`GoodBuddy <version> 更新内容` and
`What's New in GoodBuddy <version>`, with corresponding `功能更新` /
`Features` and `问题修复` / `Bug Fixes` sections when applicable. The two
language versions must describe the same changes. Do not expose
internal-only details, credentials, private content, or unverified claims.
4. Show the exact bilingual release-note draft to the user and wait for
explicit approval. If the release commit or either language version changes
after approval, inspect the updated tag range and request approval again.
5. Write the approved notes to the single entry for the release version in
`resources/release-notes.json`. A failed unpublished candidate whose content
is carried forward must not retain a duplicate packaged entry.
6. Verify that `package.json`, the root `package-lock.json` version, and
`package-lock.json.packages[""].version` all equal the release version. Run
`npm run release:notes:verify`, the required source validators, the
production build, and any native candidate launch probe available on the
current host. The six native CI jobs remain the cross-platform authority.
7. Fetch both remotes immediately before tagging. Inspect any remote branch
movement instead of overwriting or silently merging it. Confirm the working
tree is clean, the candidate tag is unused locally and remotely, and the
exact approved commit has not changed.
8. Only after all previous steps pass, create an annotated
`v${package.version}` tag at the exact approved commit. Push `main` to
`origin` and `github`, verify both branch SHAs, then push the tag to both
remotes and verify each peeled tag SHA (`refs/tags/<tag>^{}`) equals the
release commit.
9. Keep both approved language versions as the single source for the GitHub
Release body and the packaged first-open release-notes modal. The modal
displays the release notes matching the current interface language and
contains no button linking to a full release page.
10. Observe the tag workflow through publication and complete the public
verification checklist below. A successful push is not a completed
release.
### OSS Publication Contract
The tagged release job publishes through the GitHub Environment selected by
`.github/workflows/packages.yml` (`aliyun-oss-release`) and reads the following
effective GitHub Actions variables. Before a release or same-tag rerun can
publish, verify that repository-, organization-, or environment-level
resolution exposes:
- `ALIYUN_OSS_BUCKET=goodbuddy`
- `ALIYUN_OSS_ENDPOINT=https://oss-cn-beijing.aliyuncs.com`
- a non-empty `ALIYUN_OIDC_PROVIDER_ARN` matching
`acs:ram::*:oidc-provider/*`
- a non-empty `ALIYUN_ROLE_ARN` matching `acs:ram::*:role/*`
For environment-scoped values, use the exact Environment name from the
workflow; do not assume a similarly named UI environment such as `Production`
contains the active variables.
The Bucket and Endpoint are a deployment contract, not interchangeable
examples. They must stay aligned with the trusted URL checks in
`src/main/version-checker.ts`, `sites/app.js`, website validation, and related
tests. A host, Bucket, Region, or CDN migration must update and validate every
surface together before a new release.
- Use GitHub OIDC and the RAM Role to obtain short-lived STS credentials.
Never add long-lived AccessKeys to repository or environment secrets.
- Keep `ossutil` pinned. Its V4 signing requires the Region; derive it from the
canonical Endpoint, verify that the production value resolves to
`cn-beijing`, and pass `--region` to every `ossutil cp`, including the final
`latest.json` update.
- Grant the RAM Role only the actions and prefixes required by the workflow.
It must be able to write immutable version objects and the final latest
pointer without granting unrelated administration privileges.
- Upload release assets and `site-release.json` under the immutable
`releases/<tag>/` prefix first. Verify all 12 installer URLs publicly before
creating or publishing the GitHub Release. Update
`releases/latest.json` only after the GitHub Release is public and all prior
checks succeeded.
- The expected GitHub Release contains 20 assets: 12 installers (two formats
for each of six platform/architecture targets), six renamed target
manifests, one aggregate `release-manifest.json`, and one `SHA256SUMS`.
`site-release.json` is an OSS publication artifact, not a GitHub Release
asset.
### Failed Tag Recovery
Classify a failed tag by the external side effects that completed before
choosing a recovery:
- If no source or release metadata must change, correct only the external
configuration and use **Re-run failed jobs** for the same immutable tag. Do
not change, move, delete, or recreate the tag.
- If immutable OSS objects were partially uploaded but their source bytes are
unchanged, a same-tag rerun may idempotently re-upload or verify them. Never
point `latest.json` at a partially verified prefix.
- If the GitHub Release is already public but the final latest-pointer step
failed, it is a published version. Keep its packaged notes and rerun the
failed release job for the same tag; do not classify it as an unpublished
candidate.
- If code or release metadata must change, keep the failed tag immutable,
increment the patch version, obtain approval for the revised exact release
commit and notes, and create a new tag. Do not reuse the failed version.
When recovering from a version tag whose workflow never published a public
GitHub Release:
- If a code or metadata change requires a higher version and a new tag, carry
the failed candidate's approved user-facing notes forward into the recovery
version, then remove the superseded failed version's entry from
`resources/release-notes.json`.
- The packaged first-open modal must show that carried-forward content only
once under the recovery version. Never retain both the failed version and
its cumulative recovery copy, because users upgrading across them would see
duplicate content.
- Never remove the packaged history for a version that successfully published
a GitHub Release. Verify the failed release state before treating an entry as
superseded.
### Post-Publication Verification
Do not report a release complete until all of the following are verified:
1. The tag workflow and all six native package jobs succeeded. Verify the
recorded macOS signing mode: signed builds must pass `codesign`, `spctl`,
and `stapler`; unsigned builds must record the Gatekeeper caveat in the
Actions log and job summary. In the final release job, explicitly verify
the OSS configuration, OIDC authentication, release-index generation,
immutable upload, public asset check, GitHub Release publication, and
latest-pointer steps.
2. The public GitHub Release is non-draft, non-prerelease, marked Latest, and
uses the expected tag and title. Its body must exactly match the Markdown
generated from the approved packaged bilingual notes.
3. The GitHub asset set has exactly the expected 20 names and every asset is
uploaded. Compare installer sizes and SHA-256 digests with the aggregate
manifest and `SHA256SUMS`.
4. The Beijing `releases/latest.json` returns HTTP 200, has the expected stable
version, exact six targets and 12 installer entries, the trusted Beijing
URLs, and the GitHub fallback URL. It must match the immutable
`releases/<tag>/site-release.json`.
5. All 12 public installer URLs accept `HEAD` without redirects and report the
declared size. For small JSON/checksum metadata, prefer a `GET` byte and
digest comparison; OSS may gzip JSON responses and omit an uncompressed
`Content-Length` on `HEAD`.
6. The live website successfully fetches the index and produces the 12 correct
platform/architecture/format links. Exercise the application's actual
mirror checker against the public index for all six targets.
7. Both remote `main` refs and both peeled tag refs still equal the approved
release commit, and the local working tree is clean.
Never create or push a release tag, and never push a previously created
release tag, before the release-note draft has received explicit approval.
- Before a push that updates the `github` remote, ask whether the user wants a
release tag unless they already specified that choice. A branch-only push
does not require a version bump or tag. When the user requests a release,
verify that `package.json` and `package-lock.json` contain the same release
version, create `v${package.version}` at the exact commit being pushed, and
push that tag so the native package matrix and GitHub Release run.
- Never move or reuse an existing release tag. If `v${package.version}` already
exists locally or on a remote at another commit, increment the package
version and create a new matching tag before the release push.
- Verified release baseline on 2026-08-18: commit
`60119a4317118fa3f077db0382664f15266a6682`, annotated tag `v0.10.4`, and
GitHub Actions run `32038633609` attempt 2 succeeded through all six native
packages, GitHub Release publication, Beijing OSS publication, and the final
`latest.json` switch.
## Validation
Run all validators after source changes:
```text
npm test
npm run typecheck
npm run lint
```
Run `npm run build` for production build changes. Use `npm run portable` only
when a current Windows portable package is requested. Gated runtime tests may
make paid or external calls, so run them only with explicit authorization.
Before committing or pushing, inspect `git status`, `git diff`, and
`git diff --cached`. Do not commit secrets, local databases, logs, generated
credentials, or private user artifacts.
This repository has two synchronized remotes, `origin` and `github`. Unless the
user explicitly names a remote, every requested push must update the current
branch on both remotes. When the user requests a release tag, push the new tag
to every remote receiving the branch update. Verify all updated branch refs and
any applicable tag refs after pushing.